Abstract
Three business case scenarios in the context of emerging mobile access network technologies and business players have been studied and the economical results are presented. The aim is to cover some of the most interesting business alternatives in providing the new 3G and beyond services including cases where the operator may have an existing second-generation cellular network or not, and a license for the 3G UMTS network or not. The scenarios have been analyzed in different Western European country groups that are not exactly representative of any defined country, but rather share typical demographic characteristics. Investments and operational expenditures are identified and the results show how diverse business models and technologies lead to different revenue, cost, and profitability profiles. The business case scenarios include incumbent’s 3G evolution with UMTS compared to an alternative 3G technology deployment with mobile WiMAX, new entrant’s UMTS deployment business case, and a greenfield CDMA450 deployment business case.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ECOSYS project web site: http://optcomm.di.uoa.gr/ecosys/.
Pohjola, O.-P., & Kilkki, K. (2004). An economic approach to analyse mobile services. Networks 2004, Vienna, Austria, June. Available in http://holistic.nokia.com.
Varoutas, D., Katsianis, D., Sphicopoulos, T., Loizillon, F., Kalhagen, K. O., Stordahl, K., et al. (2003). Business opportunities through UMTS-WLAN networks. Annales des Telecommunications, 58, 553–575.
Katsianis, D., Welling, I., Ylönen, M., Varoutas, D., Sphicopoulos, T., Elnegaard, N. K., et al. (2001). The financial perspective of the mobile networks in Europe. IEEE Personal Communication, 8, 58–64.
Harno, J. (2002). 3G business case successfulness within the constraints set by competition, regulation and alternative technologies. The Journal of the Communications Network, 1 Part 2, 159–165, (July–September).
Harno, J. (2005). With or without UMTS license—can network deployment with alternative technologies compete with UMTS in Europe? The Journal of the Communications Network, 4 Part 3, 147–152, (July–September).
Olsen, B. T., Katsianis, D., Varoutas, D., Stordahl, K., Harno, J., Elnegaard, N. K., et al. (2006). Technoeconomic evaluation of the major telecommunication investment options for European players. IEEE Network, 20 (4), July.
Kilkki, K., & Pohjola, O.-P. (2004). Reattempts and the value of calls 17th Nordic Teletraffic Seminar, Forneby, Norway, August. Available in http://holistic.nokia.com.
Three (2005). Company web-site. Available at http://www.three.com/.
ITU 3G Licensing Workshop (2001). Licensing of third generation (3G) mobile: Briefing paper. Sep 2001. http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ni/3G/workshop/Briefing_paper.PDF.
Response by Hutchison 3G (UK) Ltd to the Draft Communications Bill, Aug 2002. www.communicationsact.gov.uk/responses/H3G%20response%20to%20draft%20bill%20FINAL.doc.
Samra, S. (2004). Worldwide success of CDMA2000: Benefits to operators in 450 MHz. CDMA450 Evolution Seminar, June 2004, Warsaw, Poland.
CDMA Development Group (CDG) (2005). Web-site. Available at http://www.cdg.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harno, J., Kumar, K.R.R., Eskedal, T.G. et al. Techno-economic evaluation of 3G and beyond mobile business alternatives. Netnomics 8, 5–23 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9026-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9026-x