Skip to main content
Log in

A game theory modeling approach for 3G operators

  • Published:
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the technoeconomic evaluation of a third generation rollout scenario followed by the identification of the market conditions for two operators in a simple game theory model. The considered scenarios reflect the point of view of both dominant operators and new entrants. Technoeconomic results are presented in terms of net present value (NPV), acting like the pay-off function in the proposed theoretical Game Theory model. The business case presented here was studied by using a tool, developed by European Projects IST-25172 TONIC/ECOSYS, a model developed by the EURESCOM P901 project and the Game Theory Tool named Gambit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen, B. T., Zaganiaris, A., Stordahl, K., Ims, L. A., Myhre, D., Overli, T., et al. (1996). Techno-economic evaluation of narrowband and broadband access network alternatives and evolution scenario assessment. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 14, 1203. doi:10.1109/49.508288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Katsianis, D., Welling, I., Ylonen, M., Varoutas, D., Sphicopoulos, T., Elnegaard, N. K., et al. (2001). The financial perspective of the mobile networks in Europe. IEEE Personal Communications, 8, 58–64, Dec. doi:10.1109/98.972169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Varoutas, D., Katsianis, D., Sphicopoulos, T., Loizillon, F., Kalhagen, K. O., Stordahl, K., et al. (2003). Business opportunities through UMTS-WLAN networks. Annales Des Telecommunications-Annals of Telecommunications, 58, 553–575, Mar-Apr.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Monath, T., Elnegaard, N. K., Cadro, P., Katsianis, D., & Varoutas, D. (2003). Economics of fixed broadband access network strategies. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41, 132–139, Sep. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2003.1232248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen, B. T., Katsianis, D., Varoutas, D., Stordahl, K., Harno, J., Elnegaard, N. K., et al. (2006). Technoeconomic evaluation of the major telecommunication investment options for European players. IEEE Network, 20, 6–15, Jul-Aug. doi:10.1109/MNET.2006.1668398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ji, H. B., & Huang, C. Y. (1998). Non-cooperative uplink power control in cellular radio systems. Wireless Networks, 4, 233–240, Apr. doi:10.1023/A:1019108223561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, J., Modiano, E., & Zheng, L. Z. (2006). Wireless channel allocation using an auction algorithm. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24, 1085–1096, May. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2006.872890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman, D., & Mandayam, N. (2000). Power control for wireless data. IEEE Personal Communications, 7, 48–54, Apr. doi:10.1109/98.839331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saraydar, C. U., Mandayam, N. B., & Goodman, D. J. (2001). Pricing and power control in a multicell wireless data network. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 19, 1883–1892, Oct. doi:10.1109/49.957304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saraydar, C. U., Mandayam, N. B., & Goodman, D. J. (2002). Efficient power control via pricing in wireless data networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 50, 291–303, Feb. doi:10.1109/26.983324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smit, H. T. J., & Trigeorgis, L. (2007). Strategic options and games in analysing dynamic technology investments. Long Range Planning, 40, 84–114, Feb. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ims, L. (1998). Broadband access networks introduction strategies and techno-economic evaluation. Telecommunication technology and applications. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cerboni, A., Harno, J., Varoutas, D., Katsianis, D., Welling, I., & Kalhagen, K. O. (2001). UMTS-WLAN roaming in hot-spot areas: A techno-economic study. In 3rd IEEE WLAN Workshop.

  14. IST-TONIC (2000). Techno-economics of IP Optimised Networks and Services. Brussels: EU.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CELTIC-ECOSYS (2002). Techno-ECOnomics of integrated communication SYStems and services. Helsinki: CELTIC.

    Google Scholar 

  16. EURESCOM (2001). EURESCOM-P901 (European Institute for Research and Strategic Studies in Telecommunications GmbH). Heidelberg: EURESCOM.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen, B. T., & Stordahl, K. (2004). Models for forecasting cost evolution of components and technologies. Telektronikk, 4, 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKelvey, R. D. (1997). An interactive extensive form game program. http://econweb.tamu.edu/gambit/. California Institute of Technology.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Katsianis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsianis, D., Gyürke, A., Konkoly, R. et al. A game theory modeling approach for 3G operators. Netnomics 8, 71–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9022-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9022-1

Keywords

Navigation