Skip to main content
Log in

Heuristic algorithms for a second-best congestion pricing problem

  • Published:
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing a congestion pricing scheme involves a number of complex decisions. Focusing on the quantitative parts of a congestion pricing system with link tolls, the problem involves finding the number of toll links, the link toll locations and their corresponding toll level and schedule. In this paper, we develop and evaluate methods for finding the most efficient design for a congestion pricing scheme in a road network model with elastic demand. The design efficiency is measured by the net social surplus, which is computed as the difference between the social surplus and the collection costs (i.e. setup and operational costs) of the congestion pricing system. The problem of finding such a scheme is stated as a combinatorial bi-level optimization problem. At the upper level, we maximize the net social surplus and at the lower level we solve a user equilibrium problem with elastic demand, given the toll locations and toll levels, to simulate the user response. We modify a known heuristic procedure for finding the optimal locations and toll levels given a fixed number of tolls to locate, to find the optimal number of toll facilities as well. A new heuristic procedure, based on repeated solutions of a continuous approximation of the combinatorial problem is also presented. Numerical results for two small test networks are presented. Both methods perform satisfactorily on the two networks. Comparing the two methods, we find that the continuous approximation procedure is the one which shows the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckmann, M. J., McGuire, C. B., & Winsten, C. B. (1956). Studies in the economics of transportation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dafermos, S. C. (1973). Toll patterns for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transportation Science, 7, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daganzo, C. F., & Sheffi, Y. (1977). On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science, 11, 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gartner, N. H. (1980). Optimal traffic assignment with elastic demands: A review; Part II: Algorithmic approaches. Transportation Science, 14, 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hearn, D. W., & Yildirim, M. B. (2002). Toll pricing framework for traffic assignment problems with elastic demand. In M. Gendreau & P. Marcotte (Eds.), Transportation and network analysis: Current trends. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larsson, T., & Patriksson, M. (1992). Simplicial decomposition with disaggregated representation for the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science, 26, 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marchand, M. (1968). A note on optimal tolls in an imperfect environment. Econometrica, 36, 575–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maruyama, T., & Sumalee, A. (2007). Efficiency and equity comparison of cordonand area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  9. May, A. D., Milne, D. S., Shepherd, S. P., & Sumalee, A. (2002). Specification of optimal cordon pricing locations and charges. Transportation Research Record, 1812, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patriksson, M. (1994). The traffic assignment problem: Models and methods. Utrecht, The Netherlands: VSP.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patriksson, M., & Rockafellar, R. T. (2003). Sensitivity analysis of aggregated variational inequality problems, with application to traffic equilibria. Transportation Science, 37, 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shepherd, S., & Sumalee, A. (2004). A genetic algorithm based approach to optimal toll level and location problems. Network and Spatial Economics, 4, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawphongpanich, S., & Hearn, D. W. (2004). An MPEC approach to second-best toll pricing. Mathematical Programming Series B, 101, 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sumalee, A. (2004). Optimal road user charging cordon design: A heuristic optimization approach. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19, 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verhoef, E., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1996). Second-best congestion pricing: the case of an untolled alternative. Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhoef, E. T. (2002). Second-best congestion pricing in general networks. Heuristic algorithms for finding second-best optimal toll levels and toll points. Transportation Research Part B, 36, 707–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wardrop, J. (1952). Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, 1(2), 325–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, H., & Lam, W. H. K. (1996). Optimal road tolls under conditions of queueing and congestion. Transportation Research Part A, 30, 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, H. M., & Ge, Y. E. (2004). Modeling variable demand equilibrium under second-best road pricing. Transportation Research Part B, 38, 733–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, X., & Yang, H. (2004). The optimal cordon-based network congestion pricing problem. Transportation Research Part B, 38, 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joakim Ekström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekström, J., Engelson, L. & Rydergren, C. Heuristic algorithms for a second-best congestion pricing problem. Netnomics 10, 85–102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9019-9

Keywords

Navigation