Abstract
Investment planning for rural mobile networks is critically dependant on the local conditions. There are geographical limits beyond which network deployment is not economically justified. Methodology to assess these limits is presented in this paper. Two different network deployment scenarios are assessed for rural deployment. The scenarios differ technically – one uses well known radio technologies, while the other employs advanced radio link enhancement technologies. Radio link enhancement technologies have evolved to a point where the new technology should be used in early network planning scenarios to maximize investment efficiency. Investment efficiency is also subject to environmental and demographic conditions. A better understanding of the conditions will guide mobile network operators to successful investment planning. A simple cash flow model is created to estimate the success of the investment. Rural conditions in South Africa are used as a case study to assess the feasibility of the selected approach to investment planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sabat, K. H. (2005). The network investment economics of the mobile wireless industry. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(2), 187–206. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
Elvidge, A. M., & Martucci, J. (2003). Telecommunications network total cost of ownership and return on investment modeling. BT Technology Journal, 21(2), 184–190.
Hellawell, A., et al. (2005). Ultra low cost handsets – integrated analysis suggests subscriber upside in developing Asia. Global Equity Research in Asia, Lehman Brothers.
Whitaker, R. M., Raisanen, L., & Hurley, S. (2005). The infrastructure efficiency of cellular wireless networks. Computer Networks, 48(6), 941–959.
Hao, Q., Soong, B., Gunawan, J., Ong, C. B., & Li, Z. (1997). A low-cost cellular mobile communication system. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas Communications, 15(7), 1315–1326.
Gavish, B., & Sridhar, S. (1995). Economic aspects of configuring cellular networks. Wireless Networks, 1, 115–128.
Brealey, R. A., & Myers, S. C. (2003). Principles of corporate finance (7th edn.). USA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Okumura, Y., et al. (1968). Field strength and its variability in VHF and UHF land mobile radio service. Review of Electrical Communication Laboratory, 16(9/10), 825–873.
Hata, M. (1980). Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile for network planning. IEEE Transactions of Vehicular Technology, 29, 317–325.
Merrill Lynch’s Global Wireless Matrix. http://www.cwes01.com/10323/24789/Interactive_Global_Matrix.xls.
EIU database. www.eiu.com.
World Bank’s World Development Indicators. http://devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2006/contents/index2.htm.
3GPP TS 45.005 Radio transmission and reception specifications.
Halonen, T., Romero, J., & Melero, J. (2003). GSM, GPRS and EDGE performance evolution towards 3G/UMTS (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.
Hämäläinen, J., et al. (2003). On the performance of GSM/EDGE transmit diversity schemes when employing dual-polarized antennas. VTC, 4, 22–25, 2003–Spring, 4, 2418–2422, April 2003.
3GPP TR 43.030 Radio network planning aspects.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pöllänen, O., Säily, M. Mobile coverage investment model linked to mobile network design. Netnomics 8, 49–70 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9015-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9015-0