Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Within-Individual BOLD Signal Variability and its Implications for Task-Based Cognition: A Systematic Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within-individual blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal variability, intrinsic moment-to-moment signal fluctuations within a single individual in specific voxels across a given time course, is a relatively new metric recognized in the neuroimaging literature. Within-individual BOLD signal variability has been postulated to provide information beyond that provided by mean-based analysis. Synthesis of the literature using within-individual BOLD signal variability methodology to examine various cognitive domains is needed to understand how intrinsic signal fluctuations contribute to optimal performance. This systematic review summarizes and integrates this literature to assess task-based cognitive performance in healthy groups and few clinical groups. Included papers were published through October 17, 2022. Searches were conducted on PubMed and APA PsycInfo. Studies eligible for inclusion used within-individual BOLD signal variability methodology to examine BOLD signal fluctuations during task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and/or examined relationships between task-based BOLD signal variability and out-of-scanner behavioral measure performance, were in English, and were empirical research studies. Data from each of the included 19 studies were extracted and study quality was systematically assessed. Results suggest that variability patterns for different cognitive domains across the lifespan (ages 7–85) may depend on task demands, measures, variability quantification method used, and age. As neuroimaging methods explore individual-level contributions to cognition, within-individual BOLD signal variability may be a meaningful metric that can inform understanding of neurocognitive performance. Further research in understudied domains/populations, and with consistent quantification methods/cognitive measures, will help conceptualize how intrinsic BOLD variability impacts cognitive abilities in healthy and clinical groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Funding

The first author (SNS) was funded by the Georgia State University Research on the Challenges of Acquiring Language and Literacy Graduate Fellowship. No other funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SNS: idea for the review article, literature search and data extraction/synthesis, draft and critically revise manuscript; TZK: critically revise manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tricia Z. King.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

List of References for Neuromodulatory Implications of Within-Individual BOLD Signal Variability

  • Alavash et al. (2018)

  • Cools (2007)

  • Cools and D’Esposito (2010)

  • Cools and D’Esposito (2011)

  • Day et al. (2019)

  • Garrett et al. (2015)

  • Guitart-Masip et al. (2016)

  • Lalwani et al. (2021)

  • Ricciardi et al. (2013)

  • van Holstein et al. (2011)

Appendix 2

References for resting-state within-individual BOLD signal variability in clinical groups

Reference

Clinical group

Easson and McIntosh (2019)

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Good et al. (2020)

Alzheimer’s Disease

Martino et al. (2016)

Bipolar Depression, Mania

Millar et al. (2020a)

Alzheimer’s Disease

Nomi et al. (2017)

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Olivé et al. (2021)

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Petracca et al. (2017)

Multiple Sclerosis

Scarapicchia et al. (2018)

Alzheimer’s Disease

Scarapicchia et al. (2019)

Subjective Cognitive Decline

Zhang et al. (2020)

Alzheimer’s Disease

Zhang et al. (2021)a

Broad “psychiatric disease”

Zhao et al. (2020)

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Zoller et al. (2017)

22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

Zoller et al. (2018)

22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

  1. a= uses unique variability quantification (mean-scaled fractional BOLD signal variability, mfSDBOLD)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinberg, S.N., King, T.Z. Within-Individual BOLD Signal Variability and its Implications for Task-Based Cognition: A Systematic Review. Neuropsychol Rev (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09619-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09619-x

Keywords

Navigation