Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subjective Cognitive Decline: Level of Risk for Future Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, a Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies

  • Review
  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) in older adults has been identified as a risk factor for dementia, although the literature is inconsistent, and it is unclear which factors moderate progression from SCD to dementia. Through separate meta-analyses, we aimed to determine if SCD increased the risk of developing dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, we examined several possible moderators. Longitudinal studies of participants with SCD at baseline, with data regarding incident dementia or MCI, were extracted from MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Articles were excluded if SCD occurred solely in the context of dementia, MCI, or as part of a specific disease. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, with moderator analyses examining whether risk varied according to SCD definition, demographics, genetics, recruitment source, and follow-up duration. Risk of study bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. 46 studies with more than 74,000 unique participants were included. SCD was associated with increased risk of developing dementia (HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.52–2.36; OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.97–3.14) and MCI (HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.18–2.52; OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.56–2.16). None of the potential moderating factors examined influenced the HR or OR of developing dementia. In contrast, including worry in the definition of SCD, younger age, and recruitment source impacted the OR of developing MCI, with clinic samples demonstrating highest risk. SCD thus represents an at-risk phase, ideal for early intervention, with further research required to identify effective interventions for risk reduction, and cognitive-behavioural interventions for cognitive management. PROSPERO, protocol number: CRD42016037993

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant Number 602543; Kerryn Pike), and a Tracey Banivanua Mar Fellowship through La Trobe University (Kerryn Pike). This work was conducted during the tenure of an Alzheimer’s Australia Dementia Research Foundation (now Dementia Australia Research Foundation) PhD Scholarship (Marina Cavuoto).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KP had the idea for the review. Literature search, data-extraction, and quality analysis were performed by KP and MC. Data analysis was performed by KP and BW. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KP and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerryn E. Pike.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None. The funding source had no involvement in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Data Availability

Data is available from Kerryn Pike on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: MEDLINE and PsychINFO Search Strategies

Ovid MEDLINE (R) 1946 to Present, including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations

Subjective

Cognitive/ Memory

Decline

Ageing

Longitudinal studies

exp Self Report/ OR exp Diagnostic Self Evaluation/ OR exp Self-Assessment OR subjective.mp

OR self report.mp

OR self rated.mp

exp Memory/ OR exp Cognition/ OR cognit*.mp. OR memory.mp

exp Memory Disorders/ OR exp Cognition Disorders/ OR change*.mp. OR impairment*.mp. OR complaint*.mp. OR disorder*.mp. OR decline.mp. OR concern*.mp. OR difficult*.mp

exp Aging/ OR exp Aged/ OR OR aging.mp. OR ageing.mp. OR aged.mp. OR elderly.mp OR older.mp

exp Longitudinal Studies/OR exp Prospective Studies/ OR exp Followup Studies/ OR follow up.mp. OR prospective.mp. OR longitudinal.mp

With limits: English language, Human

(((exp Self Report/ OR exp Diagnostic Self Evaluation/ OR exp Self-Assessment OR subjective.mp. OR self rated.mp. OR self report.mp.)

AND (exp Memory/ OR exp Cognition/ OR exp OR cognit*.mp. OR memory.mp.)

AND (exp Memory Disorders/ OR exp Cognition Disorders/ OR change*.mp. OR impairment*.mp. OR complaint*.mp. OR disorder*.mp. OR decline.mp. OR concern*.mp. OR difficult*.mp.)).

OR ((exp Memory/ OR exp Cognition/ OR cognit*.mp. OR memory.mp.) AND complaint*.mp.)).

AND (exp Aging/ OR exp Aged/ OR aging.mp. OR ageing.mp. OR aged.mp. OR elderly.mp OR older.mp).

AND (exp Longitudinal Studies/OR exp Prospective Studies/ OR exp Followup Studies/ OR follow up.mp. OR prospective.mp. OR longitudinal.mp.)

PsycINFO (1987 – present)

Subjective

Cognitive/ Memory

Decline

Ageing

Longitudinal studies

exp Self Report/ OR exp Self Evaluation/ OR subjective.mp. OR self rated.mp. OR self report.mp

exp Memory/ OR exp Cognition/ OR exp Cognitive Ability/ OR exp Cognitive Impairment/ OR cognit*.mp. OR memory.mp

exp Memory Disorders/ OR exp Brain Disorders/ OR change*.mp. OR impairment*.mp. OR complaint*.mp. OR disorder*.mp. OR decline.mp. OR concern*.mp. OR difficult*.mp

exp Aging/ OR aging.mp. OR ageing.mp. OR aged.mp. OR elderly.mp OR older.mp

exp Longitudinal Studies/OR exp Prospective Studies/ OR exp Followup Studies/ OR follow up.mp. OR prospective.mp. OR longitudinal.mp

With limits: English language, Human

(((exp Self Report/ OR exp Self Evaluation/ OR subjective.mp. OR self rated.mp. OR self report.mp.)

AND (exp Memory/ OR exp Cognition/ OR exp Cognitive Ability/ OR exp Cognitive Impairment/ OR cognit*.mp. OR memory.mp.)

AND (exp Memory Disorders/ OR exp Brain Disorders/ OR change*.mp. OR impairment*.mp. OR complaint*.mp. OR disorder*.mp. OR decline.mp. OR concern*.mp. OR difficult*.mp.)).

OR ((exp Memory/ OR exp Cognition/ OR exp Cognitive Ability/ OR exp Cognitive Impairment/ OR cognit*.mp. OR memory.mp.) AND complaint*.mp.)).

AND (exp Aging/ OR aging.mp. OR ageing.mp. OR aged.mp. OR elderly.mp OR older.mp).

AND (exp Longitudinal Studies/OR exp Prospective Studies/ OR exp Followup Studies/ OR follow up.mp. OR prospective.mp. OR longitudinal.mp.)

Appendix B: Retrieved Studies from the Same Cohort and Decisions Made re Inclusion

Table.7 Decisions made re studies retrieved from the same cohort

Appendix C: Signalling Questions Used to Assess Risk of Bias in each QUADAS-2 Tool Domain

Domain

Signalling question(s)

Patient selection

1. Are the baseline demographics of controls and SCD well matched?

2. Was the same recruitment source used for controls and SCD?

3. Was the same screening process applied to controls and SCD?

Index test (SCD)

1. Does the definition of SCD capture the group of interest?

2. Was there sufficient screen of cognitive impairment at baseline?

Reference standard (outcome)

1. Was a valid outcome measure used?

2. Were those making the outcome diagnoses blind to SCD status?

3. Was there no selectivity in reporting of outcomes?

Patient flow and timing

1. Was attrition similar across SCD and controls?

Appendix D: Funnel Plots Assessing Publication Bias

Fig. 7
figure 7

Funnel plot of publication bias for incident dementia hazard ratio studies

Fig. 8
figure 8

Funnel plot of publication bias for incident dementia odds ratio studies

Fig. 9
figure 9

Funnel plot of publication bias for incident mild cognitive impairment hazard ratio studies

Fig. 10
figure 10

Funnel plot of publication bias for incident mild cognitive impairment odds ratio studies

Appendix E: Moderation analyses

Table.8 Subgroup moderator analyses: definition and recruitment source
Table 9 Meta-regression moderator analyses: Demographics, genetics, and duration of follow-up

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pike, K.E., Cavuoto, M.G., Li, L. et al. Subjective Cognitive Decline: Level of Risk for Future Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, a Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. Neuropsychol Rev 32, 703–735 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09522-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09522-3

Keywords

Navigation