Neuropsychology Review

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 99–110 | Cite as

Is the Right Anterior Temporal Variant of Prosopagnosia a Form of ‘Associative Prosopagnosia’ or a Form of ‘Multimodal Person Recognition Disorder’?

Review

Abstract

The construct of associative prosopagnosia is strongly debated for two main reasons. The first is that, according to some authors, even patients with putative forms of associative visual agnosia necessarily present perceptual defects, that are the cause of their recognition impairment. The second is that in patients with right anterior temporal lobe (ATL) lesions (and sparing of the occipital and fusiform face areas), who can present a defect of familiar people recognition, with normal results on tests of face perception, the disorder is often multimodal, affecting voices (and to a lesser extent names) in addition to faces. The present review was prompted by the claim, recently advanced by some authors, that face recognition disorders observed in patients with right ATL lesions should be considered as an associative or amnestic form of prosopagnosia, because in them both face perception and retrieval of personal semantic knowledge from name are spared. In order to check this claim, we surveyed all the cases of patients who satisfied the criteria of associative prosopagnosia reported in the literature, to see if their defect was circumscribed to the visual modality or also affected other channels of people recognition. The review showed that in most patients the study had been limited to the visual modality, but that, when the other modalities of people recognition had been taken into account, the defect was often multimodal, affecting voice (and to a lesser extent name) in addition to face.

Keywords

Associative prosopagnosia Multimodal person recognition disorder Right anterior temporal lesions Face familiarity feelings Familiar people identification 

References

  1. Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular systems and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 32–60). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  2. Anaki, D., Kaufman, Y., Freedman, M., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). Associative (prosop)agnosia without (apparent) perceptual deficits: a case-study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1658–1671.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assal, G. (1969). Regression of physiognomy recognition disorders and topographic memory disorders in a patient operated on for intracerebral, right parieto-temporal hematoma. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 121(2), 184–185.Google Scholar
  4. Balaban, M. T., & Waxman, S. R. (1997). Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1), 3–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, J. J. (2008). Prosopagnosia associated with a left occipitotemporal lesion. Neuropsychologia, 46(8), 2214–2224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton, J. J., & Cherkasova, M. (2003). Face imagery and its relation to perception and covert recognition in prosopagnosia. Neurology, 61(2), 220–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton, J. J., Cherkasova, M., & O’Connor, M. (2001). Covert recognition in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia. Neurology, 57(7), 1161–1168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton, J. J., Press, D. Z., Keenan, J. P., & O’Connor, M. (2002). Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology, 58(1), 71–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benton, A. L., & Van Allen, M. W. (1968). Impairment of facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. Cortex, 4, 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benton, A. L., & Van Allen, M. W. (1972). Prosopagnosia and facial discrimination. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 15(2), 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blank, H., Anwander, A., & von Kriegstein, K. (2011). Direct structural connections between voice- and face-recognition areas. Journal of Neurosciences, 31(36), 12906–12915.Google Scholar
  13. Blonder, L. X., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1991). The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain, 114(3), 1115–1127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bodamer, J. (1947). Die prosopoagnosic. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 179(1–2), 6–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boudouresques, J., Poncet, M., Cherif, A. A., & Balzamo, M. (1979). Agnosia for faces: evidence of functional disorganization of a certain type of recognition of objects in the physical world. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine, 163(7), 695–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruyer, R., Laterre, C., Seron, X., Feyereisen, P., Strypstein, E., Pierrard, E., et al. (1983). A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces. Brain and Cognition, 2(3), 257–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bukach, C. M., Bub, D. N., Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2006). Perceptual expertise effects are not all or none: spatially limited perceptual expertise for faces in a case of prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 48–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 361–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Busigny, T., & Rossion, B. (2011). Holistic processing impairment can be restricted to faces in acquired prosopagnosia: evidence from the global/local Navon effect. Journal of Neuropsychology, 5(1), 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Busigny, T., Robaye, L., Dricot, L., & Rossion, B. (2009). Right anterior temporal lobe atrophy and person-based semantic defect: a detailed case study. Neurocase, 15, 485–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Busigny, T., Joubert, S., Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., & Rossion, B. (2010). Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 4057–4092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., Rapp, B. C., & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantic hypothesis: multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: a systems level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Damasio, A. R. (1990). Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge. Trends in Neuroscience, 13, 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Renzi, E. (1986). Current issues in prosopagnosia. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 243–252). Dordrecht: Martinus Nisoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Renzi, E., & Di Pellegrino, G. (1998). Prosopagnosia and alexia without object agnosia. Cortex, 34, 403–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Renzi, E., Liotti, M., & Nichelli, P. (1987). Semantic amnesia with preservation of autobiographic memory: a case report. Cortex, 23, 575–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Renzi, E., Bonacini, M. G., & Faglioni, P. (1989). Right posterior brain-damaged patients are poor at assessing the age of a face. Neuropsychologia, 27(6), 839–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., Grossi, D., & Nichelli, P. (1991). Apperceptive and associative forms of prosopagnosia. Cortex, 27(2), 213–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De Renzi, E., Perani, D., Carlesimo, G. A., Silveri, M. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere. An MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia, 32, 893–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Delvenne, J. F., Seron, X., Coyette, F., & Rossion, B. (2004). Evidence for perceptual deficits in associative visual (prosop)agnosia: a single-case study. Neuropsychologia, 42(5), 597–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., & Critchley, E. M. R. (1989). Loss of memory for people following temporal lobe damage. Brain, 112, 1469–1483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Esiri, M. M. (1982). Herpes simplex encephalitis. An immunohistological study of the distribution of viral antigen within the brain. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 54(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Evans, J. J., Heggs, A. J., Antoun, N., & Hodges, J. R. (1995). Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy. Brain, 118, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Föcker, J., Holig, C., Best, A., & Röder, B. (2011). Crossmodal interaction of facial and vocal person identity information: an event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1385, 229–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gainotti, G. (2000). What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: a review. Cortex, 36(4), 539–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gainotti, G. (2006). Anatomical, functional and cognitive determinants of semantic memory disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(5), 577–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gainotti, G. (2007). Different patterns of famous people recognition disorders in patients with right and left anterior temporal lesions: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1591–1607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gainotti, G. (2011). What the study of voice recognition in normal subjects and brain-damaged patients tells us about models of familiar people recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2273–2282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gainotti, G., & Marra, C. (2011). Differential contribution of right and left temporo-occipital and anterior temporal lesions to face recognition disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(55), 1–11. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00055.Google Scholar
  45. Gainotti, G., Barbier, A., & Marra, C. (2003). Slowly progressive defect in recognition of familiar people in a patient with right anterior temporal atrophy. Brain, 126(4), 792–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gainotti, G., Ferraccioli, M., Quaranta, D., & Marra, C. (2008). Cross-modal recognition disorders for persons and other unique entities in a patient with right fronto-temporal degeneration. Cortex, 44(3), 238–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gauthier, I., Behrmann, M., & Tarr, M. J. (1999). Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 349–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gentileschi, V., Sperber, S., & Spinnler, H. (1999). Progressive defective recognition of familiar people. Neurocase, 5, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gentileschi, V., Sperber, S., & Spinnler, H. (2001). Crossmodal agnosia for familiar people as a consequence of right infero-polar temporal atrophy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 439–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gonzalez, I. Q., Leon, M. A. B., Belin, P., Martinez-Quintana, Y., Garcia, L. G., & Castillo, M. S. (2011). Person identification through faces and voices: an ERP study. Brain Research, 1407, 13–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hailstone, J. C., Crutch, S. J., Vestergaard, M. D., Patterson, R. D., & Warren, J. D. (2010). Progressive associative phonagnosia: a neuropsychological analysis. Neuropsychologia, 48(4), 1104–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hanley, J. R., Young, A. W., & Pearson, N. A. (1989). Defective recognition of familiar people. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Henke, K., Schweinberger, S. R., Grigo, A., Klos, T., & Sommer, W. (1998). Specificity of face recognition: recognition of exemplars of non-face objects in prosopagnosia. Cortex, 34, 289–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1988). On the case for multiple semantic systems - a reply. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jackendoff, R. (1987). On beyond zebra: the relation of linguistic and visual information. Cognition, 26, 89–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kapur, N., Barker, S., Burrows, E. H., Ellison, D., Brice, J., Illis, L. S., et al. (1994). Herpes simplex encephalitis: long term magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological profile. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 57(11), 1334–1342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Levine, D. N., & Calvanio, R. (1989). Prosopagnosia: a defect in visual configural processing. Brain and Cognition, 10, 149–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lhermitte, F., & Pillon, B. (1975). Prosopagnosia. Role of the right hemisphere in visual perception. (Apropos of a case after right occipital lobectomy). Revue Neurologique (Paris), 131(11), 791–812.Google Scholar
  59. Lissauer, H. (1890). Ein fall von seelenblindheit nebst einem beitrag zur theorie derselben. Archives fur Psychiatrie, 21, 222–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(54) doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054.
  61. Malone, D. R., Morris, H. H., Kaym, M. C., & Levin, H. S. (1982). Prosopagnosia: a double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 45(9), 820–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McNeil, J. E., & Warrington, E. K. (1991). Prosopagnosia: a reclassification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, 43(2), 267–287.Google Scholar
  63. Nakachi, R., Muramatsu, T., Kato, M., Akiyama, T., Saito, F., Yoshino, F., et al. (2007). Progressive prosopagnosia at the very early stage of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Psychogeriatrics, 7, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pancaroglu, R., Busigny, T., Johnston, S., Sekunova, A., Duchaine, B., Barton, J.J. (2011). The right anterior temporal lobe variant of prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision, vol.1 no. 11, article 573.Google Scholar
  65. Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). Semantic dementia: One window on the structure and organisation of semantic memory. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, vol. 2 (2nd ed., pp. 313–333). North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  66. Phylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells to the mind’s brain: a critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ross, E. D. (1980). The anatomic basis of visual agnosia. Neurology, 30(1), 109–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schweich, M., & Bruyer, R. (1993). Heterogeneity in the cognition manifestations of prosopagnosia: the study of a group of single cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schweinberger, S. R., Klos, T., & Sommer, W. (1995). Covert face recognition in prosopagnosia: a dissociable function? Cortex, 31, 517–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sergent, J., & Poncet, M. (1988). Patterns of perceptual deficits in 2 prosopagnosic patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 50.Google Scholar
  71. Sergent, J., & Poncet, M. (1990). From covert to overt recognition of faces in a prosopagnosic patient. Brain, 113, 989–1004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sergent, J., & Signoret, J. L. (1992). Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 375–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sergent, J., & Villemure, J. G. (1989). Prosopagnosia in a right hemispherectomized patient. Brain, 112, 975–995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Snowden, J. S., Thompson, J. C., & Neary, D. (2004). Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia. Brain, 127, 860–872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsukiura, T., Fujii, T., Fukatsu, R., Otsuki, T., Okuda, J., Umetsu, A., et al. (2002). Neural basis of the retrieval of people’s names: evidence from brain-damaged patients and fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 922–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tsukiura, T., Mokizuki-Kawai, H., & Fujii, T. (2006). Dissociable roles of the bilateral anterior temporal lobe in face-name associations: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 30, 617–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tsukiura, T., Suzuki, C., Shigemune, Y., & Mokizuki-Kawai, H. (2008). Differential contribution of the anterior temporal and medio-temporal lobe to the retrieval of memory for person identity information. Human Brain Mapping, 29(12), 1343–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tyrrell, P. J., Warrington, E. K., Frackowiak, R. S., & Rossor, M. N. (1990). Progressive degeneration of the right temporal lobe studied with positron emission tomography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 53(12), 1046–1050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tzavaras, T., Merienne, L., & Masure, M. C. (1973). Prosopagnosie, amnésie et troubles du langage par lésion temporale gauche chez un sujet gaucher. Encephale, 62, 382–394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. von Kriegstein, K., Kleinschmidt, A., Sterzer, P., & Giraud, A. L. (2005). Interaction of face and voice areas during speaker recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Neuropsychological Research and Department of NeurosciencesUniversità Cattolica of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Clinical and Behavioral NeurologyIRCCS Fondazione Santa LuciaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Center for Neuropsychological Research, Institute of NeurologyPoliclinico Gemelli, Catholic University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations