Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Localization Approach for Tracking the Mobile Nodes Using FA Based ANN in Subterranean Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Localization is an essential approach in the branch of wireless sensor networks that have been introduced crucial research interest in academic circles and research association. Main aim is to create the localization scheme to enhance the localization accuracy. With the aim is to support long battery life for network devices with low rate, low power consumption and minimum resource requirements. The ZigBee network formation is carried out in the proposed model. The position of the mobile node is evaluated depend upon received signal strength indicator by means of firefly algorithm based artificial neural network (FA-ANN) technique. RSSI data for mobile points are calculated in advance and they maintained in fingerprint database. The finding phase size and principal component analysis is calculated for reducing the size of RSSI fingerprints. The affinity propagation clustering technique is affiliated to decrease the higher position error and improve the effectiveness of the location prediction. The proposed trained FA neural network is based on the clustered RSSI value for accurate localization. Finally, trained FA based neural network is utilized to find the accurate position of the mobile node with minimal consumption of mobile node energy. Thus the hybrid approach, the localization error is reduced and node prediction is achieved in a faster rate. The implementation output of the presented system shows that can be provide localization accuracy of 95% and significantly improves the prediction speed in terms of minimum location time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jondhale SR, Deshpande RS, Walke SM, Jondhale AS (2016) Issues and challenges in RSSI based target localization and tracking in wireless sensor networks. In: International conference on automatic control and dynamic optimization techniques (ICACDOT). IEEE, pp 594–598

  2. Kiruthiga G, Mohanapriya M (2017) An adaptive signal strength based localization approach for wireless sensor networks. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1057-3

  3. Farooq-I-Azam M, Ni Q, Ansari EA (2016) Intelligent energy efficient localization using variable range beacons in industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 12(6):2206–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vempaty A, Ozdemir O, Agrawal K, Chen H, Varshney PK (2013) Localization in wireless sensor networks: byzantines and mitigation techniques. IEEE Trans Signal Process 61(6):1495–1508

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Han G, Xu H, Duong TQ, Jiang J, Hara T (2013) Localization algorithms of wireless sensor networks: a survey. Telecommun Syst 52:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pandey S, Varma S (2016) A range based localization system in multihop wireless sensor networks: a distributed cooperative approach. Wirel Pers Commun 86(2):615–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu E, Ding Z, Dasgupta S (2013) Target tracking and mobile sensor navigation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(1):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pak JM, Ahn CK, Shmaliy YS, Lim MT (2015) Improving reliability of particle filter-based localization in wireless sensor networks via hybrid particle/FIR filtering. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 11(5):1089–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han G, Liu L, Jiang J, Shu L, Hancke G (2017) Analysis of energy-efficient connected target coverage algorithms for industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 13(1):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Safa H (2014) A novel localization algorithm for large scale wireless sensor networks. Comput Commun 45:32–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Han G, Yang X, Liu L, Guizani M, Zhang W (2017) A disaster management-oriented path planning for mobile anchor node-based localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2687319

  12. El Assaf A, Zaidi S, Affes S, Kandil N (2016) Low-cost localization for multihop heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15(1):472–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Selmic RR, Phoha VV, Serwadda A (2016) Localization and tracking in WSNs. In: Rastko RS, Phoha VV, Serwadda A (eds) Wireless sensor networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–177

  14. Wang G, Bhuiyan MZA, Cao J, Wu J (2014) Detecting movements of a target using face tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 25(4):939–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhuiyan MZA, Wang G, Vasilakos AV (2015) Local area prediction-based mobile target tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 64(7):1968–1982

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng K, Wang H, Li H, Xiang W, Lei L, Qiao J, Shen XS (2017) Energy-efficient localization and tracking of mobile devices in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(3):2714–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou B, Chen Q, Xiao P (2017) The error propagation analysis of the received signal strength-based simultaneous localization and tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 63:3983–4007

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Oracevic A, Akbas S, Ozdemir S (2017) Secure and reliable object tracking in wireless sensor networks. Comput Secur 70:307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deng F, Guan S, Yue X, Gu X, Chen J, Lv J, Li J (2017) Energy-based sound source localization with low power consumption in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64:4894–4902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmadi H, Viani F, Polo A, Bouallegue R (2017) Learning ensemble strategy for static and dynamic localization in wireless sensor networks. Int J Netw Manag 27:e1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pak JM, Ahn CK, Shi P, Shmaliy YS, Lim MT (2017) Distributed hybrid particle/FIR filtering for mitigating NLOS effects in TOA-based localization using wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(6):5182–5191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo X, Ansari N (2017) Localization by fusing a group of fingerprints via multiple antennas in indoor environment. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(11):9904–9915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu Y (2016) Consensus-based distributed mixture Kalman filter for maneuvering target tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(10):8669–8681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Angjelichinoski M, Denkovski D, Atanasovski V, Gavrilovska L (2015) Cramér–Rao lower bounds of RSS-based localization with anchor position uncertainty. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 61(5):2807–2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng P, Zhang F, Chen J, Sun Y, Shen X (2013) A distributed TDMA scheduling algorithm for target tracking in ultrasonic sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(9):3836–3845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shu Y, Huang Y, Zhang J, Coué P, Cheng P, Chen J, Shin KG (2016) Gradient-based fingerprinting for indoor localization and tracking. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(4):2424–2433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Natu M, Sethi AS (2008) Using temporal correlation for fault localization in dynamically changing networks. Int J Netw Manag 18:303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ashok Kumar AR, Rao SV, Goswami D (2016) Simple, efficient location-based routing for data center network using IP address hierarchy. Int J Netw Manag 26(6):492–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Nguyen T, Jeong Y, Shin H, Win MZ (2015) Least square cooperative localization. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 64(4):1318–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Uikey R, Sharma S (2013) Zigbee cluster tree performance improvement technique. Int J Comput Appl 62(19):16–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pal SK, Rai CS, Singh AP (2012) Comparative study of firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization for noisy non-linear optimization problems. Int J Intell Syst Appl 4(10):50

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gharghan SK, Nordin R, Ismail M, Ali JA (2016) Accurate wireless sensor localization technique based on hybrid PSO-ANN algorithm for indoor and outdoor track cycling. IEEE Sens J 16(2):529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng B, Li L (2015) An improved localization algorithm based on genetic algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Cogn Neurodyn 9(2):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaur D (2017) Factors influencing performance of firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithms. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol 3(10):3559–3563

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rezazadeh J, Moradi M, Ismail AS, Dutkiewicz E (2014) Superior path planning mechanism for mobile beacon-assisted localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 14(9):3052–3064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Rama.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rama, P., Murugan, S. Localization Approach for Tracking the Mobile Nodes Using FA Based ANN in Subterranean Wireless Sensor Networks. Neural Process Lett 51, 1145–1164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10128-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10128-3

Keywords

Navigation