Transcranial application of low-intensity electrical stimuli is a non-invasive brain stimulation procedure, which allows one to alter the excitability of cortical cells in both humans and animals. There is a broad consensus regarding the safety of this approach in humans, and different versions and protocols of this technique have been used in basic research and clinical studies for years. In this review, we aim to provide updated information on regulatory and ethical issues concerning the use of different versions of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). This information may be critical due to its implications on the welfare and health of patients. Although tES is a safe and effective method with potential clinical and research utilities, the legal regulation criteria concerning the use different versions of tES are of critical relevance due to implications of brain stimulation for human health and well-being. Recent publications that review and describe all regulatory and safety aspects regarding the use of tES offer a practical vision about the most up-to-date information in this field and more relevant ethical implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
M. A. Nitsche, D. Liebetanz, A. Antal, et al., “Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation – technical, safety and functional aspects,” Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol., 56, 255–276 (2003).
M. A. Nitsche and W. Paulus, “Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation,” J. Physiol., 527, No. 3, 633–639 (2000).
M. A. Nitsche and W. Paulus, “Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans,” Neurology, 57, No. 10, 1899– 1901 (2001).
M. A. Nitsche and W. Paulus, “Transcranial direct current stimulation – Update 2011,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 29, No. 6, 463–492 (2011).
M. A. Nitsche, A. Seeber, K. Frommann, et al., “Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex,” J. Physiol., 568, No. 1, 291-303 (2005).
Y. Huang, A. Datta, M. Bikson, and L. C. Parra, “Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—a fully automated opensource pipeline,” J. Neural Eng., 16, No. 5, 056006 (2019).
J. Giordano, M. Bikson, E. S. Kappenman, et al., “Mechanisms and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation,” Dose Response, 15, No. 1, 1559325816685467 (2017).
M. Argyelan, L. Oltedal, Z. De Deng, et al., “Electric field causes volumetric changes in the human brain,” Elife, 8, e49115 (2019).
A. P. Mourdoukoutas, D. Q. Truong, D. K. Adair, et al., “High-resolution multi-scale computational model for non-invasive cervical vagus nerve stimulation,” Neuromodulation, 21, No. 3, 261–268 (2018).
P. Y. Chhatbar, S. A. Kautz, I. Takacs, et al., “Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in vivo,” Brain Stimul., 11, No 4., 727–733 (2018).
K. A. Caulfield, B. W. Badran, W. H. DeVries, et al., “Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold combined with reverse-calculated electric field modeling can determine individualized tDCS dosage,” BioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/798751 (2019).
K. A. Caulfield, B. W. Badran, W. H. DeVries, et al., “Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reversecalculation electric-field modeling,” Brain Stimul., 13, No. 4, 961–969 (2020).
F. Fregni, M. A. Nitsche, C. K. Loo, et al., “Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel,” Clin. Res. Regul. Aff., 32, No. 1, 22–35 (2015).
A. J. Woods, A. Antal, M. Bikson, et al., “A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 127, No. 2, 1031–1048 (2016).
P. M. Rossini, D. Burke, R. Chen, et al., “Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application: An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 126, No. 6, 1071–1107 (2015).
A. D. Boes, M. S. Kelly, N. T. Trapp, et al., “Noninvasive brain stimulation: challenges and opportunities for a new clinical specialty,” J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 30, No. 3, 173–179 (2018).
S. N. Kukke, C. C. Brewer, C. Zalewski, et al., “Hearing safety from single- and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in children and young adults,” J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 34, No. 4, 340–347 (2017).
R. Polanía, M. A. Nitsche, and C. C. Ruff, “Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation,”. Nat. Neurosci., 21, No. 2, 174–187 (2018).
W. Paulus, J. Classen, L. G. Cohen, et al., “State of the art: Pharmacologic effects on cortical excitability measures tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Brain Stimul., 1, No. 3, 151–163 (2008).
A. Antal, I. Alekseichuk, M. Bikson, et al., “Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 128, No. 9, 1774–1809 (2017).
A. Wexler, “The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: Implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals,” J. Med. Ethics, 42, No. 4, 211–215 (2016).
A. Wexler, “A pragmatic analysis of the regulation of consumer transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) devices in the United States,” J. Law Biosci., 2, No. 3, 669–696 (2015).
H. Maslen, T. Douglas, R. Cohen Kadosh, et al., “The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: extending the medical model,” J. Law Biosci. 1, No. 1, 68–93 (2014).
M. Bikson, B. Paneri, A. Mourdoukoutas, et al., “Limited output transcranial electrical stimulation (LOTES-2017): Engineering principles, regulatory statutes, and industry standards for wellness, over-the-counter, or prescription devices with low risk,” Brain Stimul., 11, No. 1, 134–157 (2018).
L. Borrione and A. R. Brunoni, “Primum non nocere or primum facere meliorem? Hacking the brain in the 21st century,” Trends Psychiatry Psychother., 39, No. 4, 232-238 (2017).
A. Jwa, “Early adopters of the magical thinking cap: a study on do-it-yourself (DIY) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) user community,” J. Law Biosci., 2, No. 2, 292–335 (2015).
N. S. Fitz and P. B. Reiner, “The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation,” J. Med. Ethics, 41, No. 5, 410–412 (2015).
A. Wexler, “Recurrent themes in the history of the home use of electrical stimulation: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the medical battery (1870–1920),” Brain Stimul. 10, No. 2, 187–195 (2017).
A. Wexler, “The social context of “Do-It-Yourself” brain stimulation: neurohackers, biohackers, and lifehackers,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 11, 224 (2017).
D. M. M. Borducchi, J. S. Gomes, H. Akiba, et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on athletes’ cognitive performance: An exploratory proof of concept trial,” Front. Psychiatry, 7, 183 (2016).
V. Dubljević, V. Saigle, and E. Racine, “The rising tide of tDCS in the media and academic literature,” Neuron, 82, No. 4, 731–736 (2014).
About this article
Cite this article
Molero-Chamizo, A., Sánchez, M.Á.S., Riquel, R.M. et al. Regulation and Ethics of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: A General View. Neurophysiology 52, 234–238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09875-0
- non-invasive brain stimulation
- transcranial electrical stimulation
- legal regulation