Skip to main content
Log in

Temperament in Cattle: A Method of Evaluation and Main Characteristics

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

A technique for evaluation of the temperament of cattle individuals has been proposed. It is based on the results of observation and three simple tests allowing one to characterize different aspects of higher nervous activity; three-point scales are used in each test. Combinations of the obtained summarized estimates make possible well-grounded classification of temperament of the examined animals according to the generally accepted scheme, namely animals with strong balanced mobile, strong balanced inert, strong imbalanced, and weak types of higher nervous activity. The proposed technique has been tested on a group of cows of the Ukrainian Black Pied dairy breed (n = 78); the respective distributions have been obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. K. Elder, K. S. Waters, G. H. Dunwell, et al., “A survey concerning cattle tick control in Queensland 2. Managerial aspects which indirectly affect tick control,” Aust. Vet. J., 56 No. 5, 205–211 (1980), doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1980.tb15972.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. J. K. Elder, J. F. Kearnan, K. S. Waters, et al., “A survey concerning cattle tick control in Queensland 4. Use of resistant cattle and pasture spelling,” Aust. Vet. J., 56, No. 5, 219–223 (1980), doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1980.tb15976.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Fordyce, M. E. Goddard, and G. W. Seifert, “The measurement of temperament in cattle and the effect of experience and genotype,” Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. J., 4, 329–332 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Gibbons, A. B. Lawrence, and M. J. Haskell, “Responsiveness of dairy cows to human approach and novel stimuli,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116, Nos. 2–4, 163–173 (2009), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. M. Gibbons, A. B. Lawrence, and M. J. Haskell, “Measuring sociability in dairy cows,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 122, Nos. 2–4, 84–91 (2010), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. M. Burrow, G. W Seifert, and N. J. Corbet, “A new technique for measuring temperament in cattle,” Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., 17, 154–157 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Grandin, “Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 36, No. 1, 1–9 (1993), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90094-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Le Neindre, G. Trillat, J. Sapa, et al., “Individual differences in docility in Limousin cattle,” J. Anim. Sci., 73, No. 8, 2249–2253 (1995), doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382249x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. King, C. E. Schuehle Pfeiffer, R. D. Randel, et al., “Influence of animal temperament and stress responsiveness on the carcass quality and beef tenderness of feedlot cattle,” Meat Sci., 74, No. 3, 546–556 (2006), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Breuer, P. H. Hemsworth, J. L. Barnett, et al., “Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 66, No. 4, 273–288, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0.

  11. S. Hoppe, H. R. Brandt, S. König, et al., “Tempera-ment traits of beef calves measured under field conditions and their relationships to performance,” J. Anim. Sci., 88, No. 6, 1982–1989 (2010), doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L. M. Cafe, D. L. Robinson, D. M. Ferguson et al., “Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits,” J. Anim. Sci., 89, No. 5, 1452–1465 (2011), doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Prévost, D. McNamee, R. K. Jessup, et al., “Evidence for model-based computations in the human amygdala during Pavlovian conditioning,” PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, No. 2, e1002918 (2013), doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. A. W. Sali, B. A. Anderson, and S. Yantis, “The role of reward prediction in the control of attention,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 40, No. 4, 1654–1664 (2014), doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. J. P. O’Doherty, J. Cockburn, and W. M. Pauli, “Learning, reward, and decision making,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 68, 73–100 (2017), doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A. B. Eder and D. Dignath, “Cue-elicited food seeking is eliminated with aversive outcomes following outcome devaluation,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove), 69, No. 3, 574–588 (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1062527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Pool, T. Brosch, S. Delplanque, and D. Sander, “Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary rewards,” Cognition, 130, No. 3, 348–359 (2014), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. I. P. Pavlov, Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes: Twentyfive Years of Objective Study of the Higher Nervous Activity (Behaviour) of Animals (W. H. Gantt, Trans.), Liverwright Publishing Corporation (1928), doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/11081-000.

  19. D. L. Grimsley and G. L. Windholz, “The neurophysiological aspects of Pavlov’s theory of higher nervous activity: in honor of the 150th anniversary of Pavlov’s birth,” J. Hist. Neurosci., 9, No. 2, 152–163 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Trofimova, “An investigation into differences between the structure of temperament and the structure of personality,” Am. J. Psychol., 123, No. 4, 467–480 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. G. V. Parshutin and T. V. Ippolitova, Types of Higher Nervous Activity, Their Definition and Relationship with the Productive Qualities of Animals, Frunze: Kyrgyzstan, 72 p. (1973).

  22. N. M. Tulloh, “Behavior of cattle in yards: II. A study in temperament,” Anim. Behav., 9, Nos. 1–2, 25-30 (1960), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(61)90046-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Fordyce, R. M. Dodt, and J. R. Wythes, “Cattle temperaments in northern Queensland. I. Factors affecting temperament,” Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 28, No. 6, 683–687 (1988), doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9880683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. J. Hayes, P. J. Bowman, A. J. Chamberlain, and M. E. Goddard, “Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges,” J. Dairy Sci., 92, No. 2, 433–443 (2009), doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. M. J. Haskell, G. Simm, and S. P. Turner, “Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle,” Front. Genet., 5, 368 (2014), doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Gardner, J. F. Legako, N. C. Burdick Sanchez, et al., “Influence of cattle temperament on blood serum fatty acid content,” J. Anim. Sci., 94, 503 (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N. C. Burdick Sanchez, J. A. Carroll, P. R. Broadway, et al., “Cattle temperament influences metabolism: metabolic response to glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity tests in beef steers,” Domest. Anim. Endocrinol., 56, 85–95 (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.02.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Llonch, M. Somarriba, C. A. Duthie, et al., “Temperament and dominance relate to feeding behaviour and activity in beef cattle: implications for performance and methane emissions,” Animal, 12, No. 12, 2639–2648 (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Lee, L. M. Cafe, S. L. Robinson, et al., “Anxiety influences attention bias but not flight speed and crush score in beef cattle,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 205, 210–215 (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Danchuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danchuk, O.V., Karposvkii, V.I., Tomchuk, V.A. et al. Temperament in Cattle: A Method of Evaluation and Main Characteristics. Neurophysiology 52, 73–79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09853-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09853-6

Keywords

Navigation