Skip to main content
Log in

Three-Dimensional Representation of Equilibrium Joint Torques in Two-Joint Movements of the Upper Limb

  • DISCUSSIONS
  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

In this theoretical study, two-joint equilibrium muscle contractions were simulated to determine the end-point forces created by the hand of the human right upper limb within the horizontal plane. For invariable frontally directed end-point forces, 3D surfaces simulating joint torques (JTs) at the shoulder and elbow joints are reconstructed by defining the characteristic angles (CAs) between the frontal axis and lines from the joint axes to the end-point. The 3D shoulder JTs are presented by planes oriented perpendicularly to the sagittal plane with a downward sagittal skewness; the elbow JT surfaces are essentially nonlinear, showing higher gradients within the left half of the working space. Oppositely directed end-point forces demonstrate the invariance of the JT surfaces that turn about the zero-torque plane while keeping their shapes. Differences between the JTs in the same curvilinear trajectories of the movements (concentric circles) are also analyzed; generation of unvaried (frontally directed) and changed (tangential) end-point forces are compared. Despite the fact that a symmetric pattern in the shoulder JTs is maintained, a transition from the frontal to tangential forces essentially influences the asymmetric pattern of the elbow JTs. The obtained results are discussed with regard to the control of multijoint movements of the limbs in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. M. Hollerbach, “Computers, brains, and the control of movement,” Trends Neurosci., 5, 189-192 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. M. Wolpertand and Z. Ghahramani, “Computational principles of movement neuroscience,” Nat. Neurosci., 3, 1212-1217 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. M. Wolpert and M. Kawato, “Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control,” Neural Netw., 11, 1317-1329 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kawato, “Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning,” Cur. Opin. Neurobiol., 9, No. 6, 718-727 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bizzi, N. Hogan, F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, and S. Giszter, “Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements?” Behav. Brain Sci., 15, No. 4, 603-613 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. G. Feldman, “Once more for the equilibrium point hypothesis (λ model),” J. Mot. Behav., 18, 17-54 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. G. Feldman, “Space and time in the context of equilibrium-point theory,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci., 2, No. 3, 287-304 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. G. Feldman, “The relationship between postural and movement stability. Progress in motor control,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 957, 105-120 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle hysteresis and movement control: a theoretical study,” Neuroscience, 83, No. 1, 303-320 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Tomiak, T. I. Abramovych, A. V. Gorkovenko, et al., “The movement- and load-dependent differences in the EMG patterns of the human arm muscles during two-joint movements (a preliminary study),” Front. Physiol., 7, No. 218 (2016); doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00218.

  11. A. I. Kostyukov, “Theoretical analysis of the force and position synergies in two-joint movements,” Neurophysiology, 48, No. 4, 287-296 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Tomiak, A. V. Gorkovenko, A. N. Tal’nov, et al., “The averaged EMGs recorded from the arm muscles during bimanual “rowing” movements,” Front. Physiol., 6, No. 349 (2015); doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00349.

  13. A. I. Kostyukov and T. Tomiak, “The force generation in a two-joint arm model: analysis of the joint torques in the working space,” Front. Neurorobot., 12, No. 77 (2018); doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00077.

  14. O. V. Lehedza, A. V. Gorkovenko, I. V. Vereshchaka, et al., “Comparative analysis of electromyographic muscle activity of the human hand during cyclic turns of isometric effort vector of wrist in opposite directions,” Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol., 61, No. 2, 3-14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. V. Lehedza, “Manifestations of hysteresis in EMG activity of muscles of the human upper limb in generation of cyclic isometric efforts,” Neurophysiology, 49, No. 3, 220-225 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Dounskaia, “The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements,” Exp. Brain Res., 166, No. 1, 1-16 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Dounskaia and J. Goble, “The role of vision, speed and attention in overcoming directional biases during arm movements,” Exp. Brain Res., 209, No. 2, 299-309 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Dounskaia, J. Goble, and W. Wang, “The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences,” J. Neurophysiol., 105, No. 3, 999-1010 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Dounskaia and W. Wang, “A preferred pattern of joint coordination during arm movements with redundant degrees of freedom,” J. Neurophysiol., 112, No. 5, 1040-1053 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle dynamics: dependence of muscle length on changes in external load,” Biol. Cybern., 56, Nos. 5/6, 375-387 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. I. Kostyukov and O. E. Korchak, “Length changes of the cat soleus muscle under frequency-modulated distributed stimulation of efferents in isotony,” Neuroscience, 82, No. 3, 943-955 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. V. Gorkovenko, S. Sawczyn, N. V. Bulgakova, et al., “Muscle agonist-antagonist interactions in an experimental joint model,” Exp. Brain Res., 222, 399-414 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. E. Milner and C. Cloutier, “Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement,” Exp. Brain Res., 122, No. 3, 309-317 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Burde, R. Osu, D. W. Franklin, et al., “The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance,” Nature, 414, No. 6862, 446-449 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. L. Gribble and D. J. Ostry, “Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles,” Exp. Brain Res., 123, No. 3, 335-360 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. M. Hill, A. M. J. Bull, A. L. Wallace, and G. R. Johnson, “Qualitative and quantitative descriptions of glenohumeral motion,” Gait Posture, 27, No. 2, 177-188 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C. D. Bryce and A. D. Armstrong, “Anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow,” Orthop. Clin. North Am., 39, No. 2, 141-154 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B. M. Van Bolhuis, C. C. Gielen, and G. J. van Ingen Schenau, “Activation patterns of mono- and bi-articular arm muscles as a function of force and movement direction of the wrist in humans,” J. Physiol., 508, Part 1, 313-324 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Kostyukov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vereshchaka, I.V., Pilewska, W., Zasada, M. et al. Three-Dimensional Representation of Equilibrium Joint Torques in Two-Joint Movements of the Upper Limb. Neurophysiology 50, 475–488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09780-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09780-1

Keywords

Navigation