Skip to main content
Log in

Parameters of Components N2 and P3 of the Auditory Cognitive Evoked Potentials in Musicians and Non-musicians

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

A Correction to this article was published on 01 August 2018

This article has been updated

We measured time parameters of the cognitive components in the auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians and non-musicians in order to determine electrophysiological correlates of the information processing rate and differentiation of the stimuli in such examined groups. It was found that the latencies of components N2 and Р3 were, on average, shorter in subjects that professionally practice music than those in non-musicians; at the same time, there were no differences between the peak-to-peak N2-P3 amplitudes in these groups. The revealed regularities can indicate that central processes of differentiation of auditory stimuli in musicians are realized more rapidly, and, correspondingly, the processing of the obtained information is quicker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 29 October 2018

    There was an error in the initials of one of the co-authors; the correct version is T. V. Kutsenko.

References

  1. Y. C. Ho, MN. C. Cheung, and A. S. Chan, “Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: crosssectional and longitudinal explorations in children,” Neuropsychology, 17, No. 3, 439-450 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. M. George and D. Coch, “Music training and working memory: An ERP study,” Neuropsychologia, 49, No. 5, 1083-1094 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Parbery-Clark, E. Skoe, C. Lam, and N. Kraus, “Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise,” Ear Hear., 30, No. 6, 653-661 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. S. Franklin, K. Sledge Moore, C. Yip, et al., “The effects of musical training on verbal memory,” Psychol. Music, 36, No. 3, 353-365 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. L. Patston, S. L. Hogg, amd L. J. Tippett, “Attention in musicians is more bilateral than in non-musicians,” Laterality, 12, No. 3, 262-272 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. F. Gardiner, A. Fox, F. Knowles, and D. Jeffrey, “Learning improved by arts training,” Nature, 381, No. 6580, 284 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Cheek and L. R. Smith, “Music training and mathematics achievement,” Adolescence, 34, No. 136, 759-761 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A. B. Graziano, M. Peterson, and G. L. Shaw, “Enhanced learning of proportional math through music training and spatial-temporal training,” Neurol. Res., 21, No. 2, 139-152 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. E. Nering, “The effect of piano and music instruction on intelligence of monozygotic twins,” Dissertation Abstracts, International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 63, No. 3-A, 812 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. G. Schellenberg, “Music lessons enhance IQ,” Psychol. Sci., 15, No. 8, 511-514 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Lee, M. Lu, and H. Ko, “Effects of skill training on working memory capacity,” Learn. Instruct., 17, 336-344 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. L. Strait, N. Kraus, A. Parbery-Clark, and R. Ashley, “Musical experience shapes top-down auditory mechanisms: Evidence from masking and auditory attention performance,” Hear. Res., 261, Nos. 1–2, 22-29 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. G. Okhrei, T. V. Kutsenko, and M. Yu. Makarchuk, “Performance of working memory of musicians and nonmusicians in tests with letters, digits, and geometrical shapes,” Biologija, 62, No. 4, 207-215 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Okhrei, T. V. Kutsenko, and M. Yu. Makarchuk, “Performance of the Stroop test with estimation of spatial localization of stimuli by musicians and nonmusicians,” Visn. Cherkas. Univ., No. 1, 82-89 (2016).

  15. A. G. Okhrei, T. V. Kutsenko, and M. Yu. Makarchuk, “Effects of music training on the performance of direct and reverse Stroop tests,” Visn. Taras Shevchenko Kyiv Natl. Univ., No. 21, 14-18 (2016).

  16. R. Brochard, A. Dufour, and O. Després, “Effect of musical expertise on visuospatial abilities: Evidence from reaction times and mental imagery,” Brain Cognit., 54, 103-109 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L. L. Patston, “Balanced brains: An investigation of visuospatial ability and lateralization in musicians,” Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology, Auckland (2007).

  18. В V. V. Gnezditskii, Evoked Brain Potentials in Clinical Practice [in Russian], Publ. House of the TRTU, Taganrog (1997).

  19. S. H. Patel and P. N. Azzam, “Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected studies of the event-related potential,” Int. J. Med. Sci., 2, 147-154 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Polich, “Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 118, 2128-2148 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. G. Okhrei, T. V. Kutsenko, and M. Yu. Makarchuk, “Specificity of auditory cognitive evoked potentials in musicians,” Neurophysiology, 43, No. 6, 507-509 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Polich and A. Kok, “Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review,” Biol. Psychol., 41, No. 2, 103-146 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Polich, L. Howard, and A. Starr, “P300 latency correlates with digits pan,” Psychophysiology, 20, No. 6, 665-670 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D. A. Nikjeh, J. J. Lister, and S. A. Frisch, “Hearing of note: An electrophysiologic and psychoacoustic comparison of pitch discrimination between vocal and instrumental musicians,” Psychophysiology, 45, No. 6, 994-1007 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Trainor, R. Desjardins, and C. Rockel,“A comparison of contour and interval processing in musicians and nonmusicians using event-related potentials,” Aust. J. Psychol., 51, No. 3, 147-153 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Besson and F. Faïta, “An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians”, J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform., 21, No. 6, 1278-1296 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. E. Genç, N. Yağişan, E. Apaydin Doğan, and B. O. Genç, “Effect of musical training on auditory event-related potentials N200 (mismatch negativity) and P300,” Turk. Klinikleri J. Med. Sci., 29, No. 1, 104-109 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Faßhauer, A. Frese, and S. Evers, “Musical ability is associated with enhanced auditory and visual cognitive processing,” BMC Neurosci., 16, 59 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Okhrei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okhrei, A.G., Kutsenko, N.V. & Makarchuk, N.Y. Parameters of Components N2 and P3 of the Auditory Cognitive Evoked Potentials in Musicians and Non-musicians. Neurophysiology 50, 203–208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-018-9738-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-018-9738-y

Keywords

Navigation