Event-Related EEG Synchronization/Desynchronization under Conditions of Cessation and Switching over of the Programs of Manual Movements in Men

A Correction to this article was published on 01 August 2018

This article has been updated

We examined differences in the patterns of event-related EEG synchronization/desynchronization (ERS/ERD) in young men under conditions of complete inhibition of the triggered motor program of a manual movement (MM) and of inhibition of such program with subsequent switching over to an alternative motor task. Forty-two healthy volunteers (men, dextrals, age 18 to 23 years) took part in the tests. The ERS and ERD indices were estimated within the EEG frequency range 8–35 Hz in frontal, central, and parietal leads. In the series with cessation of the triggered MM program and its subsequent switching over to the alternative movement, modifications of neocortical EEG activity, compared to those at complete cessation of the movement, were the following: (i) comparative decrease in the ERS intensity with respect to the 9, 11, and 16 Hz oscillations in the fronto-central cortical regions and intensification of ERD at 11 and 16 Hz in parietal leads, (ii) relative intensification of ERS in the left central neocortical zone (11 Hz frequency), that in the right frontal and parietal zones (16 Hz frequency), and (iii) ERD for the frequencies of 19–20 Hz extensively developed in the neocortex (first of all, in the left hemisphere). Oscillations with the frequency 25 Hz and higher were synchronized to a greater extent at switching of the MM program than at complete cessation of this movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Change history

  • 29 October 2018

    There was an error in transliteration of the name of one of the co-authors; the correct name is O. V. Korzhyk.

References

  1. 1.

    A. R. Aron, T. W. Robbins, and R. A. Poldrack, “Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 8, No. 4, 170–177 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    G. D. Logan, “On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: II. Stop-signal studies of repetition priming,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cogn., 11, No. 4, 675–691 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    A. Miyake, N. P. Friedman, M. J. Emerson, et al., “The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis,” Cogn. Psychol., 41, No. 1, 49–100 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    J. T. Nigg, “On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy,” Psychol. Bull., 126, No. 2, 220-246 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    K. R. Ridderinkhof, W. P. van den Wildenberg, S. J. Segalowitz, and C. S. Carter, “Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning,” Brain Cogn., 56, No. 2, 129–140 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    C. Y. Sylvester, T. D. Wager, S. C. Lacey, et al., “Switching attention and resolving interference: fMRI measures of executive functions,” Neuropsychologia, 41, No. 3, 357–370 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    G. D. Logan and W. B. Cowan, “On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control,” Psychol. Rev., 91, No. 3, 295–327 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    F. Verbruggen and G. D. Logan, “Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 12, No. 11, 418–424 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    G. D. Logan, “On the ability to inhibit thought and action. A user’s guide to the stop-signal paradigm,” in: Inhibitory Process in Attention, Memory and Language, D. Dagenbach and T. H. Carr (eds.), Academic Press, San Diego (1994), pp. 189–239.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    G. P. Band and G. J. van Boxtel, “Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms,” Acta Psychol. (Amst.), 101, Nos. 2–3, 179–211 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    M. Boecker, B. Drueke, V. Vorhold, et al., “When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: an event-related fMRI study,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 32, No. 1, 94–106 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    M. Rangel-Gomez, R. T. Knight, and U. M. Krämer, “How to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 97, No. 3, 233–244 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    R. De Jong, M. G. Coles, and G. D. Logan, “Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 21, No. 3, 498–511 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    U. M. Krämer, R. T. Knight, and T. F. Münte, “Electrophysiological evidence for different inhibitory mechanisms when stopping or changing a planned response,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 23, No. 9, 2481–2493 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    C. R. Camalier, A. Gotler, A. Murthy, et al., “Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque,” Vision Res., 47, No. 16, 2187–2211 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    F. Verbruggen, D. W. Schneider, and G. D. Logan, “How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 34, No. 5, 1212–128 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    M. Boecker, S. Gauggel, and B. Drueke, “Stop or stop-change – does it make any difference for the inhibition process?,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 87, No. 3, 234–243 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    C. Neuper, M. Wörtz, and G. Pfurtscheller, “ERS/ERD patterns reflecting sensorimotor activation and deactivation,” Prog. Brain Res., Vol. 159, Chap. 14, C. Neuper and W. Klimesch (eds.), Elsevier (2006), pp.211-222.

  19. 19.

    G. Pfurtscheller, “Functional brain imaging based on ERS/ERD,” Vision Res., 41, Nos. 10–11, 1257-1260 (2001).

  20. 20.

    G. Pfurtscheller and F. H. Lopes da Silva, “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 110, No. 11, 1842–1857 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    L. A. Zhavoronkova, Dextrals–Sinistrals. Interhemisphere Asymmetry of Biopotentials of the Brain in Humans [in Russian], Ekoinvest, Krasnodar (2009).

  22. 22.

    V. S. Lizogub, T. V. Kozhemyako, L. I. Yukhymenko, and S. M. Khomenko, “Electrophysiological characteristics of Р300 and functional organization of complicated auditory/motor reaction in teenagers,” Visn. Cherkasy Univ., Ser. Biol. Nauky,” 335, No. 2, 72–78 (2015).

  23. 23.

    K. Y. Haaland, D. L. Harrington, and R. T. Knight, “Neural representations of skilled movement,” Brain, 123, Pt. 11, 2306–2313 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    M. E. Ioffe, “Cerebral mechanisms underlying formation of novel movements during learning: evolution of classical ideas,” Pavlov Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 1, 5–21 (2003).

  25. 25.

    O. Bai, Z. Mari, S. Vorbach, and M. Hallett, “Asymmetric spatiotemporal patterns of event-related desynchronization preceding voluntary sequential finger movements: a high-resolution EEG study,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 116, No. 5, 1213–1221 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    A. C. Neubauer, A. Fink, and R. H. Grabner, “Sensitivity of alpha band ERD to individual differences in cognition,” Prog. Brain Res., 159, Chap. 11, C. Neuper and W. Klimesch (eds.), Elsevier, pp. 167–178 (2006).

  27. 27.

    A. G. Morenko, O. S. Pavlovich, and I. Ya. Kotsan, “Cortical activation processes in men with high and low initial individual frequency of the α-rhythm during sensorimotor activity of different complexities,” Fiziol. Zh., No. 5, 41–49 (2013).

  28. 28.

    C. Neuper and G. Pfurtscheller, “Event-related dynamics of cortical rhythms: frequency-specific features and functional correlates,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 43, No. 1, 41–58 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    F. H. Lopes da Silva, “Event-related neural activities: what about phase?,” Prog. Brain Res., Vol. 159, Chap. 1, C. Neuper and W. Klimesch (eds.), Elsevier (2006), pp. 3–17 (2006).59

  30. 30.

    G. Pfurtscheller, “Quantification of ERD and ERS in the time domain,” in: Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 6, G. Pfurtscheller and F. H. Lopes da Silva (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam 1999. pp. 89–106.

  31. 31.

    M. Steriade, P. Gloor, R. R. Llinás, et al., “Basic mechanisms of cerebral rhythmic activities,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 76, No. 6, 481–508 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    R. W. Thatcher, R. McAlaster, M. L. Lester, et al., “Hemispheric EEG asymmetries related to cognitive functioning in children,” in: Cognitive Processing in the Right Hemisphere, A. Perecuman (ed.), Academic Press, New York (1983), pp. 125 –145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    F. Pulvermüller, N. Birbaumer, W. Lutzenberger, and B. Mohr, “High-frequency brain activity: its possible role in attention, perception and language processing,” Prog, Neurobiol., 52, No. 5, 427–445 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Morenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korzhik, O.V., Morenko, A.G. & Kotsan, I.Y. Event-Related EEG Synchronization/Desynchronization under Conditions of Cessation and Switching over of the Programs of Manual Movements in Men. Neurophysiology 50, 189–197 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-018-9736-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • EEG activity
  • neocortex
  • manual movements
  • movement programming
  • Stop-Signal paradigm
  • Stop-Change paradigm