, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 391–401 | Cite as

Effects of Destabilization of Visual Environment Perception on the Maintenance of Upright Stance by Humans on Different Support Surfaces

  • B. N. SmetaninEmail author
  • G. V. Kozhina
  • A. K. Popov

We compared characteristics of the maintenance of human upright stance under conditions of a real visual environment (VE) and “immersion” into a virtual visual environment (VVE). The foreground of the latter corresponded to the window in the room, while the background was a view of the aqueduct with the adjacent terrain. Destabilization of the VVE was created by “coupling” of the foreground position with oscillations of the subject’s body within the sagittal plane. We measured elementary variables calculated according to the trajectory of the center of feet pressure (CFP); these variables were: (i) displacement of the vertical projection of the center of gravity (CGv) and (ii) difference between the positions of the CFP and CGv (variables CGv and CFP – CGv). When standing on a rigid support surface, the root mean square (RMS) of the spectra of oscillations of both variables decreased in the case of an antiphase relation between displacements of the VE foreground with oscillations of the body and increased in the case of an inphase relation between these variables, as compared with the RMS in the maintenance of upright stance under conditions of an immobile VE (ImVE). Under conditions of the inphase relation, however, there were no dramatic disorders in the vertical stance; maximum oscillations of the body in this case did not exceed values typical of the upright stance with the eyes closed (EC). When the upright stance was maintained on a squeezable support, body oscillations increased significantly under all visual conditions, and the difference between the RMS of the CGv spectra obtained for the conditions of the inphase relation and EC became statistically significant. In the case of standing on a squeezable support, RMSs of the CFP – CGv variable at the antiphase relation of the VVE foreground were greater than those at the inphase relation. At the same time, the RMS of the CGv spectra were, vice versa, greater at the inphase relation. Thus, upon variation of the conditions for the vertical stance maintenance, the amplitude characteristics of elementary variables (CGv and CFP – CGv) determining the CFP on a support can vary in both a parallel and an independent manner. These variables can be controlled not only by coupled but also by independent (uncoupled) mechanisms controlling their amplitude/frequency parameters.


upright stance stabilography postural reactions virtual visual environment (VVE) visual feedback 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. S. Edwarts, “Body sway and vision,” J. Exp. Psychol., 36, No. 4, 526-535 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    2. A. Nardone, M. Galante, B. Lucas, and M. Schieppati, “Stance control is not affected by paresis and reflex hyperexcitability: the case of spastic patients,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg., Psychiat., 70, No. 5, 635-643 (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    3. B. N. Smetanin, K. E. Popov, and G. V. Kozhina, “Dependence of joint stiffness on the conditions of visual control in upright undisturbed stance in humans,” Neurophysiology, 38, No. 2, 157-163 (2006).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Mirka and F. O. Black, “Clinical application of dynamic posturography for evaluating sensory integration and vestibular dysfunction,” in: Dizziness and Balance Disorders, K. Arenberg (ed.), Kugler Publ., Amsterdam, New York (1993), pp. 381-388.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    5. M. Guerraz, L. Yardley, P. Bertholon, et al., “Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control,” Brain, 124, No. 8, 1646-1656 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    6. U. Oppenheim, R. Kohen-Raz, D. Alex, et al., “Postural characteristics of diabetic neuropathy,” Diabetes Care, 22, No. 2, 328-332 (1999).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    7. K. H. Mauritz, J. Dichgans, and A. Hufschmidt, “Quantitative analysis of stance in late cortical cerebellar atrophy of the anterior lobe and other forms of cerebellar ataxia,” Brain, 102, No. 3, 461-482 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. N. Lee and J. R. Lishman, “Visual proprioceptive control of stance,” J. Hum. Mov. Stud., 1, No. 1, 87-95 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Soechting and A. Berthoz, “Dynamic role of vision in the control o f posture in man,” Exp. Brain Res., 36, No. 3, 551-561 (1979).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Berthoz, M. Lacour, J. F. Soechting, and P. P. Vidal, “The role of vision in the control of posture during linear motion,” Prog. Brain Res., 50, No. 1, 197-209 (1979).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. M. H. Dijkstra, G. Schöner, and C. C. A. M. Gielen, “Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment,” Exp. Brain Res. , 97, No. 6, 477-486 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. M. H. Dijkstra, G. Schöner, M. A. Giese, and C. C. A. M. Gielen, “Frequency dependence of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: relative phase dynamics,” Biol. Cybern., 71, No. 6, 489-501 (1994).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    13. K. Dokka, R. V. Kenyon, and E. A. Keshner, “Influence of visual scene velocity on segmental kinematics during stance,” Gait Posture, 30, No. 2, 211-221 (2009).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. S. Gurfinkel, Ya. M. Kots, and M. L. Shik, Postural Control in Humans, Nauka, Moscow (1965).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. J. Collins and C. J. De Luca, “The effects of visual input on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms,” Exp. Brain Res., 103, No. 1, 151-163 (1995).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. N. Smetanin, K. E. Popov, and G. V. Kozhina, “Postural reactions to vibratory stimulation of calf muscles under condition of visual inversion in human,” Fiziol. Chelov., 28, No. 5, 53-58 (2002).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Fitzpatrick, D. Burke, and S. C. Gandevia, “Taskdependent reflex responses and movement illusions evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in standing humans,” J. Physiol., 478, No. 2, 363-372 (1994).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. A. Horstmann and V. Dietz, “A basic posture control mechanism: the stabilization of the centre of gravity,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 76, No. 2, 165-176 (1990).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Rougier, “Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display,” Exp. Brain Res., 165, No. 2, 193-202 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. A. Winter, A. E. Patla, F. Prince, et al., “Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing,” J. Neurophysiol., 80, No. 3, 1211-1221 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Vuillerme and G. Nafati, “How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing,” Psychol. Res., 71, No. 2, 192-200 (2007).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. V. Klimenko, I. N. Nikitin, and L. D. Nikitina, Avango: A system for the Development of Visual Environments, Inst. Phys. Tech. Inform., Moscow, Protvino (2006).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. N. Smetanin, G. V. Kozhina, and A. K. Popov, “Human upright posture control in a virtual visual environment,” Fiziol. Chelov., 35, No. 2, 54-59 (2009).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Burdea and P. Coiffet, Virtual Reality Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. E. Popov, G. V. Kozhina, B. N. Smetanin, and V. Y. Shlikov, “Postural responses to combined vestibular and hip proprioceptive stimulation in man,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 11, No. 9, 3307-3311 (1999).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    26. B. N. Smetanin, G. V. Kozhina, and A. K. Popov, “Maintenance of the upright posture in humans upon manipulating the direction and delay of visual feedback,” Neurophysiology, 44, No. 5, 401-408 (2012).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Brenière, “Why we walk the way we do” J. Mot. Behav., 28, No. 2, 291-298 (1996).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    O. Caron, B. Faure, and Y. Brenière, “Estimating the center of gravity of the body on the basis of the center of pressure in standing posture,” J. Biomech., 30, 1169-1171 (1997).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Rougier and I. Farenc, “Adaptative effects of loss of vision on upright undisturbed stance,” Brain Res., 871, No. 2, 165-174 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Rougier and O. Caron, “Centre of gravity motions and ankle joint stiffness control in upright undisturbed stance modeled through fractional Brownian motion framework,” J. Mot. Behav., 32, No. 4, 405-413 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the RASMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations