Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maintenance of the Upright Posture in Humans upon Manipulating the Direction and Delay of Visual Feedback

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

We examined the maintenance of the upright posture in subjects immersed in a 3D virtual visual environment, VVE. The latter consisted of two plans; the VVE foreground represented the image of a room window, while the background looked like an outside urban landscape. The position of the foreground (window) was linked, using the respective software, with body sways in the sagittal plane and shifted in accordance with body movements, while the background always remained immobile. By manipulating the direction and time delay of the relationship between the body sways and shifts of the VVE foreground, we tried to estimate the contribution of visual signals to postural control. For this purpose, we used the technique of frequency filtration of displacements of the center of feet pressure (CFP) and, in such a way, detected signals proportional to movements of the general center of gravity (CG) of the body (CG variable). After this, we calculated the difference between the CFP and CG shifts (CFP-CG-variable). The latter variable is known to be proportional to the horizontal acceleration; this is why it was used for estimation of the muscular torques correcting CG shifts. Analysis of changes in the above variables (CG and CFP-CG) demonstrated a clear dependence between the root mean square (RMS) of their amplitude spectra on the direction of feedback between body sways and shifts of the VVE foreground. With a synphase (SPh) pattern of the link between shifts of the body and those of the VVE foreground, the RMS values were closer to the range typical of standing with the eyes closed, while with an antiphase (APh) link, they were closer to the zone of values observed under conditions of normal vision. Introduction of time delays in feedback between sagittal body sways and shifts of the VVE foreground exerted nearly similar effects on the CG and CFP-CG variables. In both SPh and APh relations, 0.2- and 0.5-sec-long time delays resulted in increases in the RMS of the sway spectrum, while 0.8- and 1.0-sec-long delays led to RMS decreases. Thus, our findings show that the maintenance of upright stance under conditions of manipulations of the direction and time delay of visual feedback is performed, at least partly, with the use of an unstable VVE foreground as the reference. This can be considered proof of a special (frequently, dominating) role of the visual signals in postural control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. S. Edwarts, “Body sway and vision, ” J. Exp. Psychol., 36, No. 4, 526–535 (1946).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. N. Lee and J. R. Lishman, “Visual proprioceptive control of stance,” J. Hum. Mov. Stud., 1, No. 1, 87–95 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Mirka and F. O. Black, “Clinical application of dynamic posturography for evaluating sensory integration and vestibular dysfunction,” in: Dizziness and Balance Disorders, K. Arenberg (ed.), Kugler Publ., Amsterdam, New York, 381–388 (1993).

  4. M. Guerraz, L. Yardley, P. Bertholon, et al., “Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control,” Brain, 124, No. 8, 1646–1656 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Rundek and K. Lalit, “Visual input is critical for postural control in patients with chronic right hemisphere infarcts,” Neurology, 74, No. 6, 448–449 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Corriveau, F. Prince, R. Hébert, et al., “Evaluation of postural stability in elderly with diabetic neuropathy”, Diabetes Care, 23, No. 8, 1187–1191 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. H. Mauritz, J. Dichgans, and A. Hufschmidt, “Quantitative analysis of stance in late cortical cerebellar atrophy of the anterior lobe and other forms of cerebellar ataxia,” Brain, 102, No. 3, 461–482 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. L. Day, M. J. Steiger, P. D. Thompson, and C. D. Marsden, “Effect of vision and stance width on human body motion when standing: implications for afferent control of lateral sway,” J. Physiol., 469, Sep, 479–499 (1993).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. N. Smetanin, K. E. Popov, and G. V. Kozhina, “Dependence of joint stiffness on the conditions of visual control in upright undisturbed stance in humans,” Neurophysiology, 38, No. 2, 157–166 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. J. Perterka and M. S. Benolken, “Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway,” Exp. Brain. Res., 105, No. 1, 101–110 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Paulus, A. Straube, and T. Brandt, “Visual postural performance after loss of somatosensory and vestibular function,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych., 50, No. 11, 1542–1545 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. M. Bronstein, “Visual vertigo syndrome: clinical and posturography findings,” J. Neurol., Neurosurg., Psychiatr., 59, No. 5, 472–476 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Jacob, S. O. Lilienfeld, J. M. R.Furman, J. D. Durrant, S. M. Turner, “Panic disorder with vestibular dysfunction: further clinical observations and description of space and motion phobic stimuli,” J. Anxiety Disord., 3, No. 1, 117–130 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Pavlou, C. Quinn, K. Murray, et all., “The effect of repeated visual motion stimuli on visual dependence and postural control in normal subjects,” Gait Posture. 33, No. 1, 113–118 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. P. I. Simeonov, H. Hsiao, B. W. Dotson, and D. E. Ammons, “Control and perception of balance at elevated and sloped surfaces,” Hum. Factors, 45, No. 1, 136–147 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Hsiao, P. Simeonov, “Preventing falls from roofs: a critical review,” Ergonomics, 44, No. 5, 537–561 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. V. Klimenko, I. N. Nikitin, and L. D. Nikitina, Avango. A system of development of the virtual surroundings, Moscow-Protvino, 2006, 250 pp.

  18. G. Burdea and P. Coiffet, Virtual Reality Technology, John Wiley and Sons, N. Y., 1994, 412 pp.

  19. B. N. Smetanin, G. V. Kozhina, and A. K. Popov, “Postural responses evoked by vibrational stimulation of the shin muscles under conditions of virtual visual environment,” Neurophysiology, 42, Nо 1, 50–56 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O. Caron, B. Faure, and Y. Breniere, “Estimating the centre of gravity of the body on the basis of the centre of pressure in standing posture,” J. Biomech., 30, No. 11/12, 1169–1171 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Rougier and I. Farenc, “Adaptative effects of loss of vision on upright undisturbed stance,” Brain Res., 871, No. 2, 165–174 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurfinkel E., “Physical foundations of stabilography,” Agressologie, 14, No. C, 9–13 (1973).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. A. Winter, A. E. Patla, F. Prince, et al., “Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing,” J. Neurophysiol., 80, No. 3, 1211–1221 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Horstmann and V. Dietz, “A basic posture control mechanism, the stabilization of the center of gravity,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 76, No. 2, 165–176 (1990)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Rougier and O. Caron, “Centre of gravity motions and ankle joint stiffness control in upright undisturbed stance modeled through fractional Brownian motion framework,” J. Mot. Behav., 32, No. 4, 405–413 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. B. N. Smetanin, G. V. Kozhina, and A. K. Popov, “Maintenance of upright stance in humans under conditions of the virtual visual environment,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 35, No. 2, 1–6 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Rougier, “Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display,” Exp. Brain Res., 165, No. 2, 193–202 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. N. Smetanin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smetanin, B.N., Kozhina, G.V. & Popov, A.K. Maintenance of the Upright Posture in Humans upon Manipulating the Direction and Delay of Visual Feedback. Neurophysiology 44, 401–408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-012-9311-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-012-9311-z

Keywords

Navigation