Abstract
Robert Musil’s Die Verwirrungen des Zöglings Törleß (1906) and Yu Dafu’s “Boundless Night” (1922) adopt similar plots about homoeroticism between the protagonist and an effeminate teenager, but for different purposes. For Robert Musil’s protagonist, his effeminate classmate is a sexual object that he momentarily uses for his sensual urges and as a means of resolving his anxieties about his sexual fantasies, identity and the link between subjective confusion and objective environment. However, Yu Dafu’s protagonist takes both the effeminate teenager and homoeroticism more seriously and sincerely, because in his anticipation, a carefree future with the feeble teenager will alleviate the frustration induced by his ungratified emotional and erotic desires, and relieve the pain of China’s vulnerability to foreign powers at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Unless otherwise indicated, all English translations of the German quotations in this article are mine.
All English translations of “Boundless Night” in this article are mine.
Translation mine.
The source text: “正在那裡想的時候, 他覺得有一個人鑽進他的被來, 他閉著眼睛, 伸手去一摸, 卻是吳遲生。他和吳遲生顛顛倒倒的講了許多話。到了第二天的早晨, 齋夫進房來替他倒洗面水, 他被齋夫驚醒的時候, 才知道是一場好夢, 他醒來的時候, 兩隻手還緊緊的抱住在那裡。” (Emphasis mine). The Chinese expression 顛顛倒倒 (diandian daodao) literally means “upside down” or “rolling up and down,” but can also indicate confusion or derangement. In this context, it can be interpreted as a double entendre. It may mean that Yu Zhifu and Wu Chisheng have a drowsy, meandering conversation, and meanwhile it suggests sexual intercourse.
References
Berkel, I. (2008). Sigmund Freud. Wilhelm Fink.
Blazek, H. (1996). Rosa Zeiten für Rosa Liebe. S. Fischer.
Bristow, J. (2011). Sexuality (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that Matter. Routledge.
Chi, T.-W. (2005). In the name of enlightenment: Pedagogy and the uses of same-sex desires in early-twentieth-century Chinese fiction. Modern Chinese Literature and Culture, 17(2), 167–201.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Polity Press.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
de Beauvoir, S. (1956 [1949]). The Second Sex. H. M. Parshley (Trans.). Jonathan Cape.
Denton, K. A. (2016). Romantic sentiment and the problem of the subject. In K. A. Denton (Ed.), The Columbia Companion to Modern Chinese Literature (pp. 145–151). Columbia University Press.
Erhart, W. (2006). Das zweite Geschlecht: ,Männlichkeit‘, interdisziplinär. Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der Deutschen Literatur, 30(2), 156–232.
Foucault, M. (2020a [1976]). The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. R. Hurley (Trans.). Penguin Classics.
Foucault, M. (2020b [1975]). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. A. Sheridan. (Trans.). Penguin Classics.
Freud, S. (1982 [1905]). Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie. In A. Mitscherlich, A. Richards, & J. Strachey (Eds.), Sigmund Freud Studienausgabe. Band V. Sexualleben (pp. 37–145). Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Gugutzer, R. (2015). Soziologie des Körpers (5th ed.). Transcript Verlag.
Halberstam, J. (2005). Queer studies. In P. Essed, D. T. Goldberg, & A. Kobayashi (Eds.), A Companion to Gender Studies (pp. 62–70). Blackwell.
Hinsch, B. (1992). Passions of the Cut Sleeve: The Male Homosexual Tradition in China. University of California Press.
Hsia, C. T. (1961). A History of Modern Chinese Fiction 1917–1957. Yale University Press.
Kriegleder, W. (2018). Eine kurze Geschichte der Literatur in Österreich (3rd ed.). Praesens.
Kubin, W. (2005). Die Chinesische Literatur im 20. Jahrhundert. K. G. Saur Verlag.
Laqueur, T. (1992). Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greek to Freud. Harvard University Press.
Le Rider, J. (1985). Der Fall Otto Weininger. Wurzeln des Antifeminismus und Antisemitismus. Löcker.
Lee, L-F. (1973). The Romantic Generation of Modern Chinese Writers. Harvard University Press.
Luserke-Jaqui, M. (1995). Robert Musil. J. B. Metzler.
Mann, S. L. (2011). Gender and Sexuality in Modern Chinese History. Cambridge University Press.
McBride, P. C. (2006). The Void of Ethics: Robert Musil and the Experience of Modernity. Northwestern University Press.
Meuser, M. (2005). Frauenkörper–Männerkörper. Somatische Kulturen der Geschlechterdifferenz. In M. Schroer (Ed.), Soziologie des Körpers (pp. 271–294). Suhrkamp Verlag.
Miller, T. (2005). Masculinity. In P. Essed, D. T. Goldberg, & A. Kobayashi (Eds.), A Companion to Gender Studies (pp. 114–131). Blackwell.
Musil, R. (2013 [1906]). Die Verwirrungen des Zöglings Törleß. Text und Kommentar. Suhrkamp.
Niekerk, C. H. (1997). Foucault, Freud, Musil. Macht und Masochismus in den Verwirrungen des Zöglings Törleβ. Zeitschrift Für deutsche Philologie, 116(4), 545–566.
Schroer, M. (2005). Zur Soziologie des Körpers. In M. Schroer (Ed.), Soziologie des Körpers (pp. 7–47). Suhrkamp Verlag.
Sengoopta, C. (2000). Otto Weininger: Sex, Science, and Self in Imperial Vienna. University of Chicago Press.
Sherman, M. J. (2017). ‘Zwischen zwei Welten zerissen’: Class identity and spaces of liminality in Musil’s Die Verwirrungen des Zöglings Törleß. Journal of Austrian Studies, 49(3/4), 65–90.
Tsu, J. (2000). Perversions of masculinity: The masochistic male subject in Yu Dafu, Guo Moruo, and Freud. Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 8(2), 269–316.
Vitiello, G. (2014). China: Ancient to modern. In E. L. Mccallum & M. Tuhkanen (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Gay and Lesbian Literature (pp. 125–142). Cambridge University Press.
Wasserstrom, J. N., & Brownell, s. (2002). Afterword: Putting gender at the center. In S. Brownell & J. N. Wasserstrom (Eds.), Chinese Femininities/Chinese Masculinities: A Reader (pp. 435–445). University of California Press.
Weeks, J. (2012). Sex, Politics and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality since 1800 (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Weininger, O. (1997 [1903]). Geschlecht und Charakter. Eine prinzipielle Untersuchung. Matthes & Seitz Verlag.
Woltersdorff, V. (2018). Schwule Un_Männlichkeiten. Queere Männlichkeiten und Männlichkeitsforschung: Ein unmögliches Verhältnis? In S. Hochreiter & S. Stoller (Eds.), Mann-Männer-Männlichkeiten. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge aus den Masculinity Studies (pp. 94–111). Praesens Verlag.
Yu, D. (2012 [1922]). Mangmang ye [Boundless Night]. In T. Zhao & J. X. Liu (Eds.), Yu Dafu da quan ji [A Selection of Yu Dafu’s Works] (pp. 46–60). New World Press.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and Nation. Sage.
Zhou, S. [or Lu, X.] (2013 [1925]). Pengbi zhiyu [The aftershock of clashing]. In H. Zhang & L. Bai (Eds.), A Minor Collection of Lu Xun: Essays (Vol. 1, pp. 212–215). Beijing Yanshan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, X. Effeminate Bodies, Individual Confusion and National Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of Robert Musil’s Die Verwirrungen des Zöglings Törleß and Yu Dafu’s “Boundless Night”. Neophilologus 108, 261–277 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-023-09797-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-023-09797-2