Skip to main content
Log in

More than a Voice from the Darkness: Charlie Marlow and the Posture of an Invented Author

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that literary criticism has long overlooked the mimetic features of Joseph Conrad’s Charlie Marlow. Building on the work of critics like Bernard Paris, it examines Marlow as an autonomous ‘invented author’ who develops throughout his various appearances in Conrad’s work. By fusing Jérôme Meizoz’s theories on author postures with Algirdas Julien Greimas’ pragmatic semiotic square, this article investigates the construction of Marlow’s author posture in relation to the dichotomous theme SolidaritySolitariness in Conrad’s ‘Youth’, Heart of Darkness, Lord Jim and Chance. The author argues that Marlow continually takes up a posture that is not ‘fixed’, a posture of in-betweenness with which he tries to avoid rigid socio-political structures, actively using this posture not only to locate himself in the novel’s world, but also to influence those around him. Conrad uses Marlow to examine the workings of authorship, the function and place of language in society and its effectiveness in conveying particular philosophical attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is important to note that I read the Marlow narratives in the following order: ‘Youth’, Heart of Darkness, Lord Jim, Chance. On the contrary critics like J. W. Johnson read ‘Youth’ as coming after Heart of Darkness. There is little evidence for this, however, as Marlow’s age is never mentioned after his appearance in ‘Youth’. ‘Youth’ was first written and published in Blackwood’s, and in the original collection ‘Youth’: A Narrative and Two Other Stories it is printed before Heart of Darkness. I take these two circumstances as enough evidence to read the narratives in this order.

  2. The optimism with which language is portrayed here still stands in stark contrast to its destructive potential, as is demonstrated by both Kurtz and the Company.

  3. From a structural point of view one could also argue that the twofold ventriloquism the novel conveys—Kurtz’s voice echoing, through Marlow and the narrator, onto the reader—invites the reader to inhabit a similarly ambiguous stance: the novel asks the reader to constantly shift and embody disparate voices.

  4. Although Conrad would of course not use such a Foucauldian term.

References

  • Arneson, R. J. (1984). Marlow’s skepticism in Heart of Darkness. Ethics, 94(3), 420–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbrook, M. C. (1941). Joseph Conrad: Poland’s English genius. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. (1975). Chance. London: Penguin Modern Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. (1993). Lord Jim. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. (1999). Heart of Darkness & other stories (Contains both ‘Youth’ and Heart of Darkness). Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics.

  • Greimas, A. J. (1991). De betekenis als verhaal: Semiotische opstellen (W. van Belle, P. Claes, D. de Geest & H. Parret, Trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Guerard, A. J. (1958). Conrad the novelist. Harvard: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. W. (1968). Marlow and chance: A reappraisal. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 10(1), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, M. (1961). Afterword to the Signet classic edition of Lord Jim. New York: New American Library: Signet Classics.

  • Lord, U. (1998). Solitude versus solidarity in the novels of Joseph Conrad: Political and epistemological implications of narrative innovation. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malbone, R. G. (1965). ‘How to be’: Marlow’s quest in Lord Jim. Twentieth Century Literature, 10(4), 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meizoz, J. (2010). Modern posterities of posture. Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In G. J. Dorleijn, R. Grüttemeier, & L. K. Altes (Eds.), Authorship revisited. Conceptions of authorship around 1900 and 2000 (pp. 81–93). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, B. (2006). Conrad’s Charlie Marlow: A new approach to Heart of Darkness and Lord Jim. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M. (2010). Self impression. Life-writing, autobiografiction and the forms of modern literature. Oxford: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (1980). Lying as dying in Heart of Darkness. PMLA, 95(3), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake, P. (2007). Conrad’s Marlow: Narrative and death in ‘Youth’, Heart of Darkness, Lord Jim and Chance. Manchester: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, I. (1978). Marlow, Henry James, and Heart of Darkness. Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 33(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Hermens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hermens, M. More than a Voice from the Darkness: Charlie Marlow and the Posture of an Invented Author. Neophilologus 101, 159–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-016-9493-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-016-9493-5

Keywords

Navigation