Abstract
Historians of medieval medicine have argued persuasively for a semiotic understanding of diagnosis, in which externally visible symptoms are understood to signify internally inaccessible humoral imbalances. Successful treatment is predicated on the correct identification and description of a stable symptom-referent pair. Illness can thus be understood as inherently performative: the infirm body performs its illness in representing externally what is present internally. Simulation—the performance of symptoms divorced from their referents—threatens to destabilize the efficacy of medical semiotics, especially in regards to mental illness, due to its inherent interiority. In a complex system of simulation and dissimulation, the twelfth century constellation of Tristan romances exploits to great effect this notion of performative truth. Nowhere is this more significant or problematic than in the Folie Tristan d’Oxford, where Tristan, lovesick for Yseult, masquerades as a madman in order to gain access to his uncle’s court and thus his beloved. Given the proximity of lovesickness to madness, the distance required to produce irony and distinguish between the original and the simulated states is reduced to zero, resulting ultimately in their conflation. Despite this, it is this very act of embodying the madman that allows Tristan’s malady to be cured.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, J. A. (2007). Urinalysis in Western culture. Kidney International, 71, 384–387.
Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et simulations. Paris: Éditions GalilÉ.
Berne. “La Folie Tristan.” (S. Rosenberg, Trans.). In N. Lacy (Ed.), Early French Tristan poems (Vol. 1, pp. 222–256). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Béroul. “Tristan.” (N. Lacy, Trans.). In N. Lacy (Ed.), Early French Tristan poems (Vol. 1, pp. 1–216). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Blakey, B. (1972). “Truth and falsehood in the Tristan of Béroul.” In F. J. Barnett et al. (Eds.), History and structure of French: Essays in honor of Professor T. B. W. Ried (pp. 19–29). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
Chocheyras, J. (2011). Réalité et imaginaire dans le Tristan de Béroul. Paris: Honoré Champion.
Fritz, J.-M. (1992). Le discours du fou au Moyen Âge. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Jacquart, D., & Thomasset, C. (1985). Sexualité et savoir medical au Moyen Âge. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Lacy, N. (1999). Where the truth lies: Fact and belief in Béroul’s Tristan. Romance Philology, 52, 1–10.
Ménard, P. (1977). Les fous dans la société médiévale: Le témoignage de la littérature au XIIe et au XIIIe siècle. Romania, 98, 433–459.
Oxford. “La Folie Tristan.” (S. Rosenberg, Trans.). In N. Lacy (Ed.), Early French Tristan Poems (Vol. 1, pp. 258–310). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Payen. J.-C. (1982). “Tristan, l’amans-amens et le masque dans les Folies.” In D. Buschinger (Ed.), La légende de Tristan au Moye Âge. Actes du Colloque des 16 et 17 janvier 1982 (pp. 61–68). Göppingen: Kümmerle.
Sargent-Baur, B. N. (1984). Truth, half-truth, untruth: Béroul’s telling of the Tristan story. In L. A. Arrathoon (Ed.), The craft of fiction: Essays in medieval poetics (pp. 393–481). Rochester, MI: Solaris.
Schaefer, J. (1993). Specularity in the mediaeval Folie Tristan poems or madness as metadiscourse. Neophilologus, 77, 355–368.
Thomas. “Tristan.” (S. Gregory, Trans.). In N. Lacy (Ed.), Early French Tristan poems (Vol. 2, pp. 1–172). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Verdon, J. (2010). Le plaisir au Moyen Âge. Paris: Perrin.
Wack, M. F. (1990). Love sickness in the Middle Ages: The viaticum and its commentaries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girard, R.W. Simulation and Dissimulation in the Folie Tristan d’Oxford. Neophilologus 99, 539–552 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-014-9422-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-014-9422-4