, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

One Adam and Nine Eves in Donald Siegel’s The Beguiled and Giovanni Boccaccio’s 3:1 of The Decameron

  • Vladimir TumanovEmail author


Donald Siegel’s 1971 film entitled The Beguiled is compared to Tale 1 of Day 3 from Giovanni Boccaccio’s The Decameron. Both stories are about a man who arrives in a garden setting and finds nine sexually starved women. In Boccaccio’s tale, a male gardener finds himself in a convent occupied by nine nuns with whom he proceeds to have sexual relations to everyone’s satisfaction. Siegel’s film is about a wounded soldier taken in at a girls’ finishing school whose nine female residents become the objects of the hero’s amorous attention. While Boccaccio adopts a philogynist tone with respect to the material, The Beguiled appears to be a virulently misogynist film projecting its female characters as jealous demons who end up mutilating and then killing their male suitor. Findings from evolutionary psychology pertaining to female jealousy and reproductive strategies are used to consider the respective attitudes toward women in the medieval tale and the twentieth-century film. Conclusions are drawn about the difficulty of placing either of the stories within a clear-cut philogynist or misogynist category.


Donald Siegel The Beguiled Clint Eastwood Misogyny Philogyny Giovanni Boccaccio The Decameron Evocriticism Evolutionary psychology Sociobiology Reproductive strategies Jealousy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. The Beguiled. (1971). Dir. Don Siegel. Universal.Google Scholar
  2. Bingham, D. (1994). Acting male: Masculinities in the films of James Stewart, Jack Nicholson, and Clint Eastwood. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boccaccio, G. (1972). The Decameron (G.H. McWilliam, Trans.) New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, B. (2009). The origin of stories: Evolution, cognition and fiction. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, N. M., & Amatea, E. S. (2000). Love and intimate relationships: Journeys of the heart. Philadelphia: Brunner and Mazel.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, D. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M., Randy, J. L., Drew, W., & Jennifer, S. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cottino-Jones, M. (1993). Desire and the fantastic in The Decameron: The third day. Italica, 70(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love: A natural history of mating, marriage, and why we stray. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2008). Human: The science behind what makes us unique. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  11. Hirsch, F. (1971–1972). The Beguiled: Southern Gothic revived. Film Heritage, 7, 15–20.Google Scholar
  12. Herring, G. (1998). The Beguiled: Misogynist myth or feminist fable? Literature/Film Quarterly, 26(3) 214–219.Google Scholar
  13. Kay, K. (1976) The Beguiled: Gothic Misogyny. Velvet Light Trap, 16, 32–33.Google Scholar
  14. Limoli, H. (1965). Boccaccio’s Masetto (“Decamerone”, III, 1). Romanische Forschungen, 77(3/4), 281–292.Google Scholar
  15. Marcus, M. (1984). Misogyny as misreading: A gloss on Decameron VIII.7. Stanford Italian Review, 4(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  16. Migiel, M. (2003). A rhetoric of The Decameron. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Riddley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, P. (1993). Clint Eastwood: A cultural production. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations