Abstract
This article explores rewriting as a concept for cultural memory studies, examining the transformation of the technology of “writing again” in different historical periods. Its aim is to elucidate in what ways rewriting functions as an act of remembrance, and how this function differs in the manuscript age, the age of print and the digital age. The article discusses differences and similarities in the stability or fluidity of texts as a medium for memory, presenting rewriting as a helpful tool to see through presumed distinctions between these periods and their characteristic methods of text transmission. In particular, the article presents findings with respect to its utility to a broad range of historical source evidence, from the early medieval literature on saints’ lives to contemporary post-colonial and feminist literature. In this article, rewriting is recognized as a transformative technology of memory, carrying and transmitting memories but not without change and adaptation. Dealing explicitly with the variety and the diversity of the media that transmit cultural memory in the different historical periods, including visual media, the article shows rewriting to be a productive concept for understanding cultural memory as an act of transfer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assmann, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125–133.
Auslander, P. (2008). Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Bal, M. (1999). Introduction. In M. Bal, J. Crewe, & L. Spitzer (Eds.), Acts of memory cultural recall in the present (pp. 20–40). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Barton, D., & Papen, U. (Eds.). (2010). The anthropology of writing: Understanding textually mediated worlds. London: Continuum.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Bloom, H. (1994). The Western canon: The books and school of the age. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Brooks, V. W. (1918) On creating a usable past. The Dial: A Semi-Monthly Journal of Literary Criticism, 64 (11 April), 337–41.
Bryant, J. (2002). The fluid text. A theory of revision and editing for book and screen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bryant, J. (2010). Rewriting Moby-Dick: Politics, textual identity, and the revision narrative. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 125(4), 1043–1060.
Calinescu, M. (1993). Rereading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Carruthers, M. (2008). The book of memory. A study of memory in medieval culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clanchy, M. (1993 [1979]). From memory to written record: England 1066–1307. London, Oxford: Blackwell.
Condé, M. (1986). Moi, Tituba, sorcière...noire de Salem. Paris: Mercure de France.
Condé, M. (1992). I, Tituba, black witch of Salem (Angela Y. Davis, Foreword Richard Philcox, Trans.). New York: Ballantine Books.
Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cornis-Pope, M. (1992). Hermeneutic desire and critical rewriting: Narrative interpretation in the wake of poststructuralism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Cothren, M. (2006). Picturing the celestial city: The medieval stained glass of Beauvais Cathedral. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Duggan, L. G. (2005). Was art really the “book of the illiterate”? In M. Hageman & M. Mostert (Eds.), Reading images and texts (pp. 63–119). Turnhout: Brepols.
Erll, A. (2011). Memory in culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Erll, A., & Nünning, A. (Eds.). (2010). A companion to cultural memory studies. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fleischmann, S. (1983). On the representation of history and fiction in the Middle Ages. History and Theory, 22, 279–310.
Frijhoff, W. (1997). Toeëigening: van bezitsdrang naar betekenisgeving. Trajecta, 6, 99–118.
Goldsmith, K. (2011). Uncreative writing: Managing language in the digital age. New York: Columbia University Press.
Goody, J. (1968). Introduction. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 27–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goullet, M. (2005). Écriture et rÉÉcriture hagiographiques. Essai sur les rÉÉcritures de vies de saints dans l’Occident latin mÉdiÉval (VIII e –XIII e s.). Turnhout: Brepols.
Hageman, M., & Mostert, M. (Eds.) (2005). Reading images and texts. Medieval images and texts as forms of communication. Utrecht Studies in Medieval Literacy 8. Turnhout: Brepols.
Hirsch, M., & Smith, V. (2002). Feminism and cultural memory: An introduction. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(1), 1–19.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Keigthley, E. (2008). Engaging with memory. In M. Pickering (Ed.), Research methods for cultural studies (pp. 175–192). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lessig, L. (2005). Free culture: The nature and future of creativity. London: Penguin.
MacLuhan, M. 1994 [1964]. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Maitland, S. (1978) Penelope. In Z. Fairbairns, S. Maitland, V. Miner, M. Roberts, & M. Wandor (Eds.), Tales I tell my mother: A collection of short stories (pp. 146–58). London: The Journeyman Press.
Mâle, E. (1958). The gothic image: Religious art in France of the thirteenth century. PhD diss., 1898 (D. Nussey Trans.). New York: Harper and Row. Originally published as L’art religieux du XIIIe siècle en France: étude sur l’iconographie du Moyen Age et sur ses sources d’inspiration (Paris: A. Colin, 1910).
Manhes-Deremble, C. (1993). Les vitraux narratifs de la cathédrale de Chartres: étude iconographique. Paris: Léopard d’or.
McKitterick, R. (1989). The Carolingians and the written word. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKitterick, R. (2008). Charlemagne. The formation of a European identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minnis, A. (2010). Medieval theory of authorship: Scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Moraru, C. (2001). Rewriting: Postmodern narrative and cultural critique in the age of cloning. Albany: SUNY Press.
Mostert, M. (2000). Das Studium alter Handschriften als Beitrag zu einer modernen Kulturwissenschaft. In H. W. Goetz (Ed.), Die Aktualität des Mittelalters: Neue Ansätze in der mediävistischen Geschichtswissenschaft (pp. 287–315). Bochum: Winkler.
Mostert, M. (2008). Forgery and trust. In P. Schulte, M. Mostert, & I. van Renswoude (Eds.), Strategies of writing: Studies on text and trust in the Middle Ages (pp. 37–59). Turnhout: Brepols.
Mostert, M. (2010). Maken, bewaren en gebruiken. Utrecht: Utrecht University Inaugural Lecture Series.
Naslund, S. J. (2000). Ahab’s wife, or, the star-gazer: A novel. New York: William Morrow.
Ong, W. (2004 [1982]). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen & Co.
Pauwels, L. (2008a). Visual literacy and visual culture: Reflections on developing more varied and explicit visual competencies. The Open Communication Journal, 2, 79–85.
Pauwels, L. (2008b). An integrated model for conceptualising visual competence in scientific research and communication. Visual Studies, 23, 147–161.
Pfaff, F. (1996). Conversations with Maryse Condé. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Plate, L. (2011). Transforming memories in contemporary women’s rewriting. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Plessow, O. (2008). Mechanisms of authentication in late medieval North German chronicles. In P. Schulte, M. Mostert, & I. van Renswoude (Eds.), Strategies of writing: Studies on text and trust in the Middle Ages (pp. 135–163). Turnhout: Brepols.
Proust, M. (1913). Du côté de chez Swann. Paris: Grasset.
Proust, M. (1989 [1910]) On reading Ruskin. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Radstone, S. (2000). Memory and methodology. Oxford: Berg.
Rehberg Sedo, D. (2011). Reading communities from salons to cyberspace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. London: Routledge.
Schulte, P., Mostert, M., & van Renswoude, I. (Eds.). (2008). Strategies of writing: Studies on text and trust in the Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols.
Stimpson, C. (1987) The future of memory. Michigan Quarterly Review 26(1), 259–265.
Stock, B. (1984–1985) Medieval literacy, linguistic theory, and social organization. New Literacy History 16, 13–29.
Stoler, A. L. (2009). Along the archival grain: Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sturken, M. (1997). Tangled memories: The Vietnam War, the aids epidemic, and the politics of remembering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire: Performing cultural memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press.
Woodmandsee, M. (1984). The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “Author”. Eighteenth Century Studies, 17(4), 425–448.
Ziolkowski, J. (2006). Mastering authors and authorizing masters in the long twelfth century. In Latinitas Perennis vol. I: The continuity of Latin literature (pp. 93–118). Leiden: Brill.
Ziolkowski, J. (2009). Cultures of authority in the long twelfth century. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 108, 421–448.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plate, L., Rose, H.G.E. Rewriting, a Literary Concept for the Study of Cultural Memory: Towards a Transhistorical Approach to Cultural Remembrance. Neophilologus 97, 611–625 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-013-9363-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-013-9363-3