Abstract
For María de Zayas, a fundamental objective of her literary work is to demonstrate that women possess keen perception and ingenuity. In La traición en la amistad, the perspicacity and ingenuity of women are made obvious by way of a complex plot based on self-interested friendships, woven around a series of references to the Iron Age. Self-interest and virtue are two opposite poles within reference to the classic philosophy of friendship: without virtue it is impossible to create a true friendship. That said, the question of what is virtue and what are its limits corresponds to the field of ethics, a discipline traditionally centered on relationships between men. Unsurprisingly, Zayas constructs a feminine friendship completely peripheral to the masculine concepts of virtue, as much for the masculine gender as for the feminine gender. These feminine friendships represent the possibility of a return to harmony after the Iron Age.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristóteles. (2007). Ética Nicomáquea. Barcelona: Gredos.
Armas, D., & Frederick, A. (1986). The return of Astraea: An astral–imperial myth in Calderón. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Armas, D., & Frederick, A. (1992). Interpolation and invisibility: From Herodotus to Cervantes’s Don Quixote. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 4(2), 8–28.
Avalle-Arce, J. B. (1957). Una tradición literaria: el cuento de los dos amigos. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica, 11, 1–35.
Ayala, F. (1965). Los dos amigos. Revista de Occidente, 30, 287–305.
Barbagallo, A. (1994). Los dos amigos, ‘El curioso impertinente’ y la literatura italiana. Anales cervantinos, 32, 207–219.
Cairns, G. E. (1962). Mythical cyclical views in the Greek and Roman worlds. In Philosophies of history: Meeting of east and west in cycle-pattern theories of history (pp. 196–203). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Cavallo, S., & Cerutti, S. (1990). Female honor and the social control of reproduction in Piedmont between 1600 and 1800. In E. Muir & G. Ruggiero (Eds.), Sex and gender in historical perspective (pp. 73–103). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Copenhaver, B. P., & Schmitt, C. B. (1992). Renaissance philosophy. A history of western philosophy (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Zayas, M. (1997). La traición en la amistad de María de Zayas. In T. S. Soufas (Ed.), Women’s acts: Plays by women dramatists of Spain’s golden age (pp. 273–308). Lexington: Kentacky UP.
Delgado Berlanga, M. J. (1999). Lesbiagrafisis: exposición y expansión del deseo femenino en La traición en la amistad de María de Zayas y Sotomayor. Romance Languages Annual, 10, 534–538.
Gorfkle, L. (1999). Female communities, female friendships and social control in María de Zayas’s La traición en la amistad: A historical perspective. Romance Languages Annual, 10, 615–620.
Hesíodo. (2000). Obras y fragmentos. Madrid: Gredos.
Kirkham, V. (1993). The classic bond of friendship in Boccaccio’s Tito and Gisippo (Decameron 10.8). In The sing of reason in Boccaccio’s fiction (pp. 237–248). Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.
Lohuizen-Mulder, M. V. (1977). Raphael’s images of justice–humanity–friendship: A mirror of princes for Scipione Borghese. Wassenaar, The Netherlands: Mirananda.
Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. NY: Norton.
Ovidio. (2003). Metamorfosis. In C. Álvarez & R. M. Iglesias (Eds.). Madrid: CÁtedra.
Rodríguez-Garrido, J. A. (1997). El ingenio en la mujer: La traición en la amistad de María de Zayas entre Lope de Vega y Huarte de San Juan. Bulletin of Comediantes, 49(2), 357–373.
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic of women: Notes on the political economy of sex. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Towards and anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). NY: Monthly Review Press.
Schaub, J.-F. (2001). Le Portugal au temps du Comte-duc d’Olivares (1621–1640): le conflit de juridictions comme exercice de la politique. Bibliothèque de la Casa de Velázquez 18. Madrid: Casa de Velázquez.
Seneca. (1935). De beneficiis. J. W. Basore (Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, C. G. (1935). Sententious theory in Spenser’s legend of friendship. ELH, 2, 165–191.
Soufas, T. S. (1994). María de Zayas’s (un)conventional play, La traición en la amistad. In C. Ganelin & H. Mancing (Eds.), The golden age comedia: Text, theory and performance. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Stradling, R. A. (1989). Felipe IV y el gobierno de España, 1621–1665. C. Laguna (Trans.). Madrid: Cátedra.
Stroud, M. (1985). Love, friendship and deceit in La traición en la amistad by María de Zayas. Neophilologus, 69, 539–547.
Virgilio. (1946). Églogas. Geórgicas. Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe.
Wind, E. (1968). Pagan mysteries in the Renaissance. NY: Norton.
Wyszynski, M. A. (1998). Friendship in María de Zayas’s La traición en la amistad. Bulletin of the Comediantes, 50(1), 21–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gil-Osle, J.P. La Edad de Hierro en La traición en la amistad de María de Zayas. Neophilologus 98, 275–286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-013-9356-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-013-9356-2