This paper considers how Old English narrative poems reintroduce narration after direct speech. It is based on a survey of eight poems: Andreas, Beowulf, Christ and Satan, Elene, Genesis A and B, Guthlac A and Juliana. Results show that those transitions (like the initial inquits) contribute to the sharp delimitation of direct speech in Old English poetry. However, the paper also demonstrates that sharp delimitation is not synonymous with freedom from narratorial interference as the framing of speeches is often used to orient interpretation. Further, it suggests that the strong delineation of direct speech should not be seen as an independent phenomenon, but as representative of the way narrative poetry treats coherent sequences of text more generally. Indeed, similarities in the treatment of transitions between passages of narration and from direct speech to narration suggest that Anglo-Saxon poets perceived direct speech as perhaps worthier of attention, but not as radically different from narration.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Acta apocrypha: Iudas, alias Quiriacus, Episcopus Martyr Hierosolymis, in Acta Sanctorum, Maius I, (Antwerp: Michel Cnobbaert, 1680), pp. 445–448.
Acta avctore anonymo ex XI veteribus MSS: Iuliana, Virgo Nicomediensis et Martyr, Bruxellae in Belgio. In J. Bollandus & G. Henschenius (Eds.), Acta Sanctorum, Februarius II (Antwerp: J. van Meurs, 1658), pp. 873–877.
Barry, J. M. (1976). The angel of light tradition in biblical commentary and English literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Bartlett, A. C. (1935). The larger rhetorical patterns in Anglo-Saxon poetry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Burchmore, S. (1985). Traditional exegesis and the question of guilt in the Old English ‘Genesis B’. Traditio, 41, 117–144.
Capek, M. J. (1970). A note on formula development in Old Saxon. Modern Philology, 67(4), 357–363.
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805.
Clemoes, P. (1979). Action in Beowulf and our perception of it. In D. G. Calder (Ed.), Old English poetry: Essays on style (pp. 147–168). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Clemoes, P. (1995). Interactions of thought and language in Old English poetry. Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England 12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doane, A. N. (1991). The Saxon genesis: An edition of the West Saxon Genesis B and the Old Saxon Vatican Genesis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Foster, R. (1975). The use of þa in Old and Middle English narratives. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 76, 404–414.
Frantzen, A. J. (2007). Drama and dialogue in Old English poetry: The scene of Cynewulf’s Juliana. Theatre Survey: The Journal of the American Society for Theatre Research, 48(1), 99–119.
Fulk, R. D. (2001). Cynewulf: Canon, dialect, and date. In R. E. Bjork (Ed.), The Cynewulf reader (pp. 3–21). New York and London: Routledge.
Georgianna, L. (1987). King Hrethel’s sorrow and the limits of action in Beowulf. Speculum, 62(4), 829– 850.
Haar, C. P. (1995). Direct speech in six Old English religious narrative poems: Forms, uses and sequences. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Heusler, A. (1902). Der Dialog in der altgermanischen erzählenden Dichtung. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur, 46, 189–284.
Klaeber, Fr. (1950). Beowulf and the fight at Finnsburg (3rd ed.). Boston: Heath.
Lee, D.-I. (1995). Character from archetype: A study of the characterization of Beowulf with reference to the diction of direct speech in Beowulf. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London and New York: Longman.
Levine, R. (1963). Direct discourse in Beowulf: Its meaning and function. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Leyerle, J. (1965). Beowulf the hero and the king. Medium Ævum, 34, 89–102.
McNally, C. E. (1975). ‘Beowulf maþelode’: Text linguistics and speech acts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton.
Ong, W. J. ( 1988). Orality & literacy: The technologizing of the word. [London: Methuen], New York: Routledge.
Orchard, A. (2003). A critical companion to ‘Beowulf’. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Pasternack, C. B. (1995). The textuality of Old English poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perelman, L. C. (1981). The conditions, consequences, and structure of direct discourse in Beowulf: A study of speech acts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Pizarro, J. M. (1989). A rhetoric of the scene: Dramatic narrative in the Early Middle Ages. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Richman, G. I. (1977). The stylistic effect and form of direct discourse in Old English literature. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University.
Schuelke, G. L. (1958). ‘Slipping’ in indirect discourse. American Speech, 33, 90–98.
Steen, J. (2008). Verse and virtuosity: The adaptation of Latin rhetoric in Old English poetry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Stévanovitch, C. (1998). Beowulf maþelode, Bearn Ecþeowes [Beowulf prit la parole, fils d’Ecgtheow]: Les formules d’insertion de tirade dans Beowulf. Q/W/E/R/T/Y: Arts, Littérature & Civilisation du Monde Anglophone, 8, 17–25.
Weldon, J. F. G. (1979). The devices of direct discourse: Some aspects of poetic organization in Old English narrative poetry. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Queen’s University at Kingston, Ontario.
About this article
Cite this article
Louviot, E. Transitions from Direct Speech to Narration in Old English Poetry. Neophilologus 97, 383–393 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-012-9312-6
- Old English poetry
- Direct speech
- Narrative structure