Advertisement

Neophilologus

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 383–393 | Cite as

Transitions from Direct Speech to Narration in Old English Poetry

  • Elise LouviotEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper considers how Old English narrative poems reintroduce narration after direct speech. It is based on a survey of eight poems: Andreas, Beowulf, Christ and Satan, Elene, Genesis A and B, Guthlac A and Juliana. Results show that those transitions (like the initial inquits) contribute to the sharp delimitation of direct speech in Old English poetry. However, the paper also demonstrates that sharp delimitation is not synonymous with freedom from narratorial interference as the framing of speeches is often used to orient interpretation. Further, it suggests that the strong delineation of direct speech should not be seen as an independent phenomenon, but as representative of the way narrative poetry treats coherent sequences of text more generally. Indeed, similarities in the treatment of transitions between passages of narration and from direct speech to narration suggest that Anglo-Saxon poets perceived direct speech as perhaps worthier of attention, but not as radically different from narration.

Keywords

Old English poetry Direct speech Narrative structure ða 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acta apocrypha: Iudas, alias Quiriacus, Episcopus Martyr Hierosolymis, in Acta Sanctorum, Maius I, (Antwerp: Michel Cnobbaert, 1680), pp. 445–448.Google Scholar
  2. Acta avctore anonymo ex XI veteribus MSS: Iuliana, Virgo Nicomediensis et Martyr, Bruxellae in Belgio. In J. Bollandus & G. Henschenius (Eds.), Acta Sanctorum, Februarius II (Antwerp: J. van Meurs, 1658), pp. 873–877.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, J. M. (1976). The angel of light tradition in biblical commentary and English literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, A. C. (1935). The larger rhetorical patterns in Anglo-Saxon poetry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burchmore, S. (1985). Traditional exegesis and the question of guilt in the Old English ‘Genesis B’. Traditio, 41, 117–144.Google Scholar
  6. Capek, M. J. (1970). A note on formula development in Old Saxon. Modern Philology, 67(4), 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clemoes, P. (1979). Action in Beowulf and our perception of it. In D. G. Calder (Ed.), Old English poetry: Essays on style (pp. 147–168). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clemoes, P. (1995). Interactions of thought and language in Old English poetry. Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England 12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Doane, A. N. (1991). The Saxon genesis: An edition of the West Saxon Genesis B and the Old Saxon Vatican Genesis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foster, R. (1975). The use of þa in Old and Middle English narratives. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 76, 404–414.Google Scholar
  12. Frantzen, A. J. (2007). Drama and dialogue in Old English poetry: The scene of Cynewulf’s Juliana. Theatre Survey: The Journal of the American Society for Theatre Research, 48(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fulk, R. D. (2001). Cynewulf: Canon, dialect, and date. In R. E. Bjork (Ed.), The Cynewulf reader (pp. 3–21). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Georgianna, L. (1987). King Hrethel’s sorrow and the limits of action in Beowulf. Speculum, 62(4), 829– 850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haar, C. P. (1995). Direct speech in six Old English religious narrative poems: Forms, uses and sequences. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  16. Heusler, A. (1902). Der Dialog in der altgermanischen erzählenden Dichtung. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur, 46, 189–284.Google Scholar
  17. Klaeber, Fr. (1950). Beowulf and the fight at Finnsburg (3rd ed.). Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, D.-I. (1995). Character from archetype: A study of the characterization of Beowulf with reference to the diction of direct speech in Beowulf. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
  19. Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Levine, R. (1963). Direct discourse in Beowulf: Its meaning and function. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Leyerle, J. (1965). Beowulf the hero and the king. Medium Ævum, 34, 89–102.Google Scholar
  22. McNally, C. E. (1975). ‘Beowulf maþelode’: Text linguistics and speech acts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton.Google Scholar
  23. Ong, W. J. ([1982] 1988). Orality & literacy: The technologizing of the word. [London: Methuen], New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Orchard, A. (2003). A critical companion to ‘Beowulf’. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  25. Pasternack, C. B. (1995). The textuality of Old English poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Perelman, L. C. (1981). The conditions, consequences, and structure of direct discourse in Beowulf: A study of speech acts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  27. Pizarro, J. M. (1989). A rhetoric of the scene: Dramatic narrative in the Early Middle Ages. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Richman, G. I. (1977). The stylistic effect and form of direct discourse in Old English literature. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  29. Schuelke, G. L. (1958). ‘Slipping’ in indirect discourse. American Speech, 33, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steen, J. (2008). Verse and virtuosity: The adaptation of Latin rhetoric in Old English poetry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stévanovitch, C. (1998). Beowulf maþelode, Bearn Ecþeowes [Beowulf prit la parole, fils d’Ecgtheow]: Les formules d’insertion de tirade dans Beowulf. Q/W/E/R/T/Y: Arts, Littérature & Civilisation du Monde Anglophone, 8, 17–25.Google Scholar
  32. Weldon, J. F. G. (1979). The devices of direct discourse: Some aspects of poetic organization in Old English narrative poetry. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Queen’s University at Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de Lorraine, Campus LSHNancy CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations