Skip to main content
Log in

Faust is Dead. Mark Ravenhill’s View on a Posthuman Era

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article departs from a close reading of Mark Ravenhill’s Faust (Faust is Dead) and argues that the play in its radical postmodern sensibilities asks fundamental questions about the future of the tragic hero in contemporary playwriting. One of its central notions is Fukuyama’s megalothymia to denote the human drive to compete with one another. As Fukuyama has delineated in his book The End of History and the Last Man (1992), man has lost this drive and is lost in an apathetic existence. It is this state of lethargy that can be noticed in Ravenhill’s play, and that also explains the use of cruelty, as a means to undo this posthuman, desireless existence. Consequently, the tragic hero has become a spectator in his own drama.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Callens, J. (2000). Sorting out ontologies in Mark Ravenhill’s Faust (Faust Is Dead). In E. Voigts-Virchow (Ed.), Mediated drama, dramatized media, CDE (Vol. 7, pp. 167–177). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, L. (2011). Cruelty and desire in the modern theater. Antonin Artaud, Sarah Kane, and Samuel Beckett. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

  • Freud, S. (1953). Psychopathic characters on the stage. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works (Vol. VII, pp. 303–310). London: The Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Kane, S. (1998). Gespräch mit Sarah Kane. In N. Tabert (Ed.), Playspotting. Die Londoner Theaterszene der 90er (pp. 8–21). Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

  • Miller, J. (2000). The passion of Michel Foucault. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenhill, M. (1997). Faust (Faust is dead). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenhill, M. (2004). A tear in the fabric: The James Bulger murder and new theatre writing in the nineties. New Theatre Quarterly, 20(4), 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain. The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierz, A. (2000). In-yer-face theatre. British drama today. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1996). Tragedy, pure and simple. In M. S. Silk (Ed.), Tragedy and the tragic (pp. 534–546). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurens De Vos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vos, L. Faust is Dead. Mark Ravenhill’s View on a Posthuman Era. Neophilologus 96, 651–659 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-012-9306-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-012-9306-4

Keywords

Navigation