Skip to main content

Robert Musil’s Cultural Diagnostics in the Light of Nietzschean Immunology

Abstract

Nietzsche was one of the first to point out the importance of immunological processes that are at work in any society to maintain its coherence against threats. At the same time, Nietzsche was aware that these immunological processes can become too rigid, ultimately even dangerous and self-destructive. Roberto Esposito has shown that Nietzsche’s work contains at the same time the seeds of such a problematic form of immunology and another way of thinking immunology that could avoid the dangerous consequences. Nietzsche knew that a society which rigidly bans out all threats will rob itself of the capacity for revitalizing itself. I will show that the Nietzschean writings on immunology are a crucial influence on Robert Musil. Due to the complexities with this aspect of Nietzsche’s work, this influence is not immediately obvious. Exploring this influence will help to clarify certain aspects of Musil’s work, such as the prevalence of pathological behavior in Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften. Moreover, it will make clear why Musil was very critical of Nietzsche’s legacy, while at the same time claiming that his work is full of possibilities which nobody takes up. To find a way to foreclose the dangerous forms of immunological thinking, for which people found inspiration in Nietzsche’s work, Musil takes up another way of thinking immunology that also comes out of Nietzsche’s thought.

References

  1. Canguilhem, G. (1989). The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esposito, R. (2008). Bios; biopolitics and philosophy. London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Groot, G. (2003). Vier ongemakkelijke filosofen; Nietzsche, Cioran, Bataille, Derrida. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SUN.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsson, S. (2004). A citizen of Kakania. New Left Review, 27(May, June), 131–141.

  5. Le Blanc, G. (2007). Les maladies de l’homme normal. Paris: J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lukács, G. (1958). Wider den missverstandenen Realismus. Hamburg: Claassen.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Musil, R. (1976). In A. Frisé (Ed.), Tagebücher. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

  8. Musil, R. (1978). In A. Frisé (Ed.), Gesammelte Werke in neun Bänden. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

  9. Nietzsche, F. (1967). Menschliches, Allzumenschliches. In G. Colli & M. Montinari (Eds.), Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Band IV2, pp. 259–430). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

  10. Nietzsche, F. (1969). Götzen-Dämmerung. In G. Colli & M. Montinari (Eds.), Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Band VI3 pp. 49–154). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

  11. Nietzsche, F. (1971). Morgenröthe. In G. Colli & M. Montinari (Eds.), Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Band V1, pp. 1–335). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

  12. Nietzsche, F. (1972). Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen. In G. Colli & M. Montinari (Eds.), Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Band III1, pp. 153–423). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

  13. Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Du musst dein Leben ändern; über Anthropotechnik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zupancic, A. (2003). The shortest shadow; Nietzsche’s philosophy of the two. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stijn De Cauwer.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Cauwer, S. Robert Musil’s Cultural Diagnostics in the Light of Nietzschean Immunology. Neophilologus 96, 411–425 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-011-9300-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Musil
  • Nietzsche
  • Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften
  • Immunology
  • Health
  • Cultural critique