Abstract
A handful of recent studies on Inca Garcilaso de la Vega assumes that early modern readers used any number of broad contemporary discourses, literary and otherwise, to mediate between specific historical examples and their own social lives. In other words, these readers actively situated these examples within their own knowledge of these discourses in order to be able to apply them appropriately to their own situations. We may pinpoint which attributes and actions contemporary readers could have understood as imitable by recreating these readers’ process of juxtaposing certain historical figures with the themes found in broader discourses with which they were familiar. The present investigation analyzes how Garcilaso historicizes and exemplifies one of the most widely debated concepts of the post-Machiavellian reason-of-state tradition: mendacity. Through the examples of the first and last Incas, Manco Capac and Atauallpa, Garcilaso demonstrates that mendacity, in one form or another, can produce either positive or negative results for society, depending on the contingency of each particular situation. As part of Garcilaso’s secular, reason-of-state analysis of the foundation of the Inca empire, the example of Manco Capac’s prudence offers readers a surprising lesson: lying, even lying about one’s religion, can be used to bring about the common good.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asensio, E. (1953). Dos cartas desconocidas del Inca Garcilaso. Nueva Revista de Filologia Hispanica, 7, 583–593.
Avalle-Arce, J. B. (1964). Perfil ideológico del Inca Garcilaso. In F. Pierce & C. A. Jones (Eds.), Actas del Primer Congreso Internacional de Hispanistas (pp. 191–197). Oxford: Dolphin Book Co.
Botero, G. (1592). Diez libros de la razon de estado. Con tres libros de las causas de la grandeza, y magnificencia de las ciudades de Iuan Botero. Tradvzido de Italiano en Castellano, por mandado del Rey nuestro señor, Por Antonio de Herrera su criado. Madrid: Luys Sanchez.
Braun, H. (2007). Juan de Mariana and early modern Spanish political thought. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Castiglione, B. (1994). El cortesano (J. Boscán, Trans.). Madrid: Cátedra.
Cochrane, E. W. (1981). Historians and historiography in the Italian renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Covarrubias Orozco, S. d. (1994). Tesoro de la lengua Castellana o Española. Madrid: Castalia.
Durand, J. (1948). La biblioteca del Inca. Nueva Revista de Filologia Hispanica, 2(3), 239–264.
Durand, J. (1963). Garcilaso: Between the world of the Incas and that of renaissance concepts. Diogenes, 43, 21–45.
Durand, J. (1976). El Inca Garcilaso, clásico de América. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.
Duviols, P. (1964). The Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, humanist interpreter of the Inca religion. Diogenes, 47, 36–52.
Fernández-Santamaría, J. A. (1986). Razón de estado y política en el pensamiento Español del barroco (1595–1640). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Garcilaso de la Vega, I. (1963). Obras completas (Biblioteca de Autores Españoles 132–35). Madrid: Atlas.
Hopkins-Rodríguez, E. (1998). The discourse on exemplarity in Garcilaso de la Vega’s La Florida del Inca. In J. Anadón (Ed.), Garcilaso Inca de la Vega: An American humanist. A tribute to José Durand (pp. 133–140). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Ilgen, W. D. (1974). La configuración mítica de la historia en los Comentarios reales del Inca Garcilaso de la Vega. In A. P. Debicki & E. Pupo-Walker (Eds.), Estudios de literatura hispanoamericana en honor a Jose J. Arrom (pp. 37–46). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Department of Romance Languages.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception (T. Bahti, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jeanneret, M. (1998). The vagaries of exemplarity: Distortion or dismissal? Journal of the History of Ideas, 59(4), 565–579.
Kahn, V. (1985). Rhetoric, prudence, and skepticism in the renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Leonard, I. A. (1986). Portraits and essays: Historical and literary sketches of early Spanish America. Newark, Delaware: Juan de la Cuesta.
MacCormack, S. (1991). Religion in the Andes: Vision and imagination in early colonial Peru. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Martin, J. J. (1997). Inventing sincerity, refashioning prudence: The discovery of the individual in renaissance Europe. The American Historical Review, 102(5), 1309–1342.
Martin, J. J. (2004). Myths of renaissance individualism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Menéndez y Pelayo, M. (1913). Historia de la poesía hispano-americana (Vol. 2). Madrid: Librería General de Victoriano Suárez.
Mexía, P. (1989). Silvia de varia lección. Madrid: Cátedra.
Pease G. Y., F. (1998). Garcilaso’s historical approach to the Incas. In J. Anadón (Ed.), Garcilaso Inca de la Vega: An American humanist. A tribute to José Durand (pp. 32–41). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Prescott, W. H. (1847). History of the conquest of Peru, with a preliminary view of the civilization of the Incas. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Ribadeneyra, P. d. (1899). Obras escogidas (Biblioteca de Autores Españoles 60). Madrid: Imprenta de Hernando y Compañía.
Rodríguez Garrido, J. A. (1998). Garcilaso Inca and the tradition of Viri Illustres (Dedication and prologue of the Royal Commentaries, Part II). In J. Anadón (Ed.), Garcilaso Inca de la Vega: An American humanist. A tribute to José Durand (pp. 71–89). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Stierle, K. (1998). Three moments in the crisis of exemplarity: Boccaccio-Petrarch, Montaigne, and Cervantes. Journal of the History of Ideas, 59(4), 581–595.
Zagorin, P. (1990). Ways of lying: Dissimulation, persecution, and conformity in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zamora, M. (1988). Language, authority, and indigenous history in the “Comentarios reales de los incas”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howard, K.D. Inca Garcilaso de la Vega’s ‘Ways of Lying’: Reason of State, Religion and Exemplary Prudence in Part I of the Comentarios Reales . Neophilologus 96, 541–552 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-011-9265-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-011-9265-1