Skip to main content
Log in

Reinterpreting Threats to Face: The Use of Politeness in Beowulf, ll. 407–472

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beowulf’s introductory speech to Hroðgar is a petition for permission to confront the monster, Grendel; this petition intimates that Hroðgar has failed in his role as protector of the Danish people and, therefore, qualifies as a Face-Threatening Act, as per Brown and Levinson’s politeness model. An application of their theory to both the petition and Hroðgar’s response demonstrates that Beowulf is baldly asserting a claim to superior social capital in relation to the Danish king. Hroðgar, however, is able to reinterpret the variables of the petition into the dynamic of a traditional gift exchange, thereby averting the threat to face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (trans: Emerson, C., & Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1975).

  • Bjork, R. E. (1994). Speech as gift in Beowulf. Speculum, 69, 993–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16, 645–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. S. (1990). Lesson in polite compliance: Gawain’s conversational strategies in fitt 3 of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. The Language Quarterly, 28(1–2), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1994). Logic and conversation. In R. M. Harnish (Ed.), Basic topics in the philosophy of language (pp. 57–73). Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1975).

  • Jambeck, T. L. (1973). The syntax of petition in Beowulf and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Style, 7(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1970). The gift: Form and functions of exchange in archaic societies (trans: Cunnison, I.). London: Cohen and West. (Original work published 1923–1924).

  • Mitchell, B. (1985). Old english syntax (Vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B., & Robinson, F. C. (1998). Beowulf: An edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, W. (1987). The flyting speech in traditional heroic narrative. Neophilologus, 71, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shippey, T. A. (1978). Beowulf. Studies in English Literature, 70. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shippey, T. A. (1993). Principles of conversation in Beowulfian speech. In J. Sinclair, M. Hoey, & G. Fox (Eds.), Techniques of description: Spoken and written discourse (pp. 109–126). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, J. R. R., Gordon, E. V., & Davis, N. (Eds.). (1967). Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Kightley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kightley, M.R. Reinterpreting Threats to Face: The Use of Politeness in Beowulf, ll. 407–472. Neophilologus 93, 511–520 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-008-9131-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-008-9131-y

Keywords

Navigation