Abstract
Towards the end of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, as almost all of the tragic strokes of the story have fallen, the narrator-makere turns away from his material to address a kind of envoy to his ‘litel bok’. In two stanzas he sends his poem on its way, cautioning and exhorting it in the same breath. This article is a re-examination of the ending, with special emphasis on these two stanzas, in the light of Plotinus’s Neoplatonic scheme of exitus and reditus, or emanation and return-to-source, that appears to influence the imagery and language of the poem at this stage. Although Plotinus’s Enneads were not read in their own right in the Middle Ages, they were transmitted through various influential channels, including Augustine and the pseudo-Dionysius. Through these thinkers, the idea of exitus and reditus came to influence Aquinas, and the theology of the later medieval period. In a discussion that draws upon Dante, the letter to Can Grande della Scala, and the Cursor Mundi, the author of this article traces the implications for the value of the poem, and its flawed, worldly subject, that the invocation of the Neoplatonic scheme of emanation entails.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dante Alighieri? (1904). Letter to Can Grande della Scala. In A translation of the Latin works of Dante Alighieri (A. G. F. Howell & P. H. Wicksteed, Trans., Vol. 20, pp. 354–355). London: Dent.
Dante Alighieri (1939). The divine comedy of Dante Alighieri (J. D. Sinclair, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Aquinas, T. (1964–1981). In T. Gilby et al. (Eds.), Summa theologiae (60 vols). London: Blackfriars.
Augustine. (1992). In J. J. O’Donnell (Ed.). Confessions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Benson, L. D. (1976). Malory’s Morte D’Arthur. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Chaucer, G. (1987). In L. D. Benson et al. (Eds.), The riverside Chaucer (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Chenu, M.-D. (1939). Le Plan de la Somme théologique de Saint Thomas. Revue Thomiste, 47, 93–107.
Chenu, M.-D. (1940). L’équilibre de la scholastique médiévale. Revue des Sciences philosophiques et␣théologiques, 29, 304–312.
Chenu, M.-D. (1964). Toward understanding Saint Thomas. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Curry, W. C. (1960). Chaucer and the medieval sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Barnes and Noble.
Emery, G. (2004). La Théologie Trinitaire de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Cerf.
Gersh, S. (1978). From Iamblichus to Eriugena. An investigation of the prehistory and evolution of the pseudo-dionysian tradition. Leiden: Brill.
Gilson, É. (1952). Being and some philosophers. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Gilson, É. (1956). The Christian philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Random.
Henry, P. (1937). Augustine and Plotinus. Journal of Theological Studies, 38, 1023.
Jakobson, R. (1987). Linguistics and poetics. In Language in literature (pp. 62–94). Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Lafont, G. (1961). Structures et Méthode dans la Somme Théologique de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer. (Repr. 1996, Paris: Les éditions du Cerf).
Minnis, A. J. (2005). “I speke of folk in seculer estaat”: Vernacularity and Secularity in the age of Chaucer. Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 27, 23–58.
Morris, R. (Ed.). (1874–1893). Cursor Mundi (7 vols). EETS OS 57, 59, 62, 66, 68, 99, 101. London.
Muller, E. (2003). Creation as existential contingency: A response. The Saint Anselm Journal, 1(1), 65–78.
Nietzsche, F., (1927). The birth of tragedy from the spirit of music. In The philosophy of Nietzsche (C. P. Fadiman, Trans.). New York: Modern Library. (Repr. as The birth of tragedy, by C. P. Fadiman, Trans., 1995, New York: Dover).
O’Meara, D. J. (Ed.). (1981a). Neoplatonism and Christian thought. Norfolk: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies.
O’Meara, J. (1981b). The Neoplatonism of Saint Augustine. In D. J. O’Meara (Ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian thought. Norfolk: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies.
O’Meara, D. J. (Ed.). (1993). Plotinus: An introduction to the Enneads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plotinus. (1991). The Enneads (S. MacKenna, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Preminger, A. & Brogan, T. V. F. (Eds.) (1993). New Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Robertson, D. W. (1962). A preface to Chaucer. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Robertson, D. W. (1985). The probable date and purpose of Chaucer’s Troilus’. Medievalia et␣Humanistica, 13, 143–171.
Thompson, J. (1997). The governance of the English tongue. In O. S. Pickering (Ed.), Individuality and achievement in middle English poetry (pp. 19–37). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Thompson, J. (1998). The cursor mundi: Poem, texts and contexts. Oxford: Society for the Study of Mediaeval Literature.
Trouillard, J. (1955). La Procession Plotinienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Wassmer, T. A. (1960). The Trinitarian theology of Augustine and his debt to Plotinus. Harvard Theological Review, 53, 261–268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carney, C. Chaucer’s ‘litel bok’, Plotinus, and the Ending of Troilus and Criseyde . Neophilologus 93, 357–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-008-9129-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-008-9129-5