Neophilologus

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 263–277 | Cite as

Lo fantástico feminista: metamorfosis y trasgresión en Rosario Ferré y Rima De Vallbona

Article

Abstract

The fantastic has always been an important feature in Latin American narrative fiction throughout the 20th century particularly in the short story. Todorov defines the fantastic as a genre characterised by hesitation and that cannot co-exist with allegory. According to him, allegory provides a metaphorical explanation of the supernatural and, in so doing, destroys the hesitation that defines the fantastic. Despite this conception, an allegoric modality of the fantastic has developed and expanded in the Latin American fiction of the last few decades, particularly amongst women authors. Following Chrisitine Brooke-Rose's proposal, according to whom allegory does not cancel the fantastic but actually can reinforce it, this article focuses on two short stories: one by Rosario Ferré — ``La muñeca menor'' — and the other by Rima De Vallbona — ``La tejedora de palabras''—, which can be understood as prime examples of this modality of the fantastic. In both stories the fantastic appears as a metaphorical devise which subverts patriarchal discourse and reinterprets the female identity. Through their conception of the real as a cultural construct of language, both Ferré and De Vallbona attempt to transgress the limits and constrictions imposed upon women by traditional essentialist male discourse. Far form constituting a harmless escape from reality, the fantastic takes on an openly political character in these short stories.

Keywords

Fantastic Allegory Feminism Latin America Short story Rosario Ferré Rima De Vallbona 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Obras citadas

  1. Andrist, D. D. (2001). Multi-transformaciones en la obra de Rima de Vallbona. En J. Chen Sham (Ed.), Nuevos acercamientos a la obra de Rima de Vallbona (pp. 119–126). San José: Perro Azul.Google Scholar
  2. Armitt, L. (1996). Theorising the fantastic. Londres: Arnold.Google Scholar
  3. Barrenechea, A. M. (1972). Ensayo de una tipología de la literatura fantástica. Revista Iberoamericana, 38, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessière, I. (1974). Le récit fantastique. París: Larousse.Google Scholar
  5. Bravo, V. (1987). Los poderes de la ficción: para una interpretación de la literatura fantástica. Caracas: Monte ávila.Google Scholar
  6. Brooke-Rose, C. (1981). A rhetoric of the unreal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carilla, E. (1968). El cuento fantástico. Buenos Aires: Nova.Google Scholar
  8. Ceserani, R. (1999). Lo fantástico. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
  9. Chanady, A. B. (1985). Magical realism and the fantastic: Resolved versus unresolved antinomy. Nueva York: Garland.Google Scholar
  10. Cornwell, N. (1990). The literary fantastic: From Gothic to postmodernism. Londres: Harvester.Google Scholar
  11. Cranny-Francis, A. (1990). Feminist fiction. Feminist uses of generis fiction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ferré, R. (1980). El cuento de hadas. Sin Nombre, 11(2), 36–40.Google Scholar
  13. Ferré, R. (1986). El acomodador. Una lectura fantástica de Felisberto Hernández. México: FCE.Google Scholar
  14. Ferré, R. (1991). La muñeca menor. En Papeles de Pandora (pp. 9–14). Río Piedras: Ediciones Huracán.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1973). El orden del discurso. Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
  16. Franco, J. (1999). Self-destructing heroines. In Critical passions: Selected essays (pp. 366–378). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hart, P. (1989). Narrative magic in the fiction of Isabel Allende. Londres/Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  18. Hart, P. (1995). Magic feminism and inverted masculine myths in Rosario Ferré’s ‹The Youngest Doll’. En M. A. Bolden et al. (Eds.), Studies in honor of María A. Salgado (pp. 97–108). Newark: Juan de la Cuesta.Google Scholar
  19. Hart, S. (2003). Eva Luna and Cuentos de Eva Luna. Critical guides to Spanish Texts. Londres: Grant & Cutler Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Hirsch, M., & Evelyn Fox Keller, E. F. (Eds.). (1990). Conflicts in feminism. Londres: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Humbert, J. (1982). Mitología griega y romana. México: Ediciones G. Gili.Google Scholar
  22. Hume, K. (1984). Fantasy and mimesis. Nueva York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  23. Hunter, L. (1989). Modern allegory and fantasy. Nueva York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, R. (1981). Fantasy: The literature of subversion. Londres: Methuen.Google Scholar
  25. Ludmer, J. (1985). Tretas del débil. En P. E. González & E. Ortega (Eds.), La sartén por el mango (pp. 47–54). Río Piedras: Ediciones Huracán.Google Scholar
  26. Manlove, C.N. (1975). Modern fantasy: Five studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ostricker, A. (1982). The thieves of language: Women poets and revisionist mythmakers. Sign, 8(1), 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabkin, E. S. (1977). The fantastic in literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Risco, A. (1982). Literatura y fantasía. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
  30. Rivera, C. S. (1994). Porcelain face/rotten flesh: The doll in Papeles de Pandora. Chasqui, 23(2), 95–101.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, D. L. (1999) Nueva narrativa hispanoamericana. Boom, posboom, posmodernismo. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
  32. Todorov, T. (1973). The fantastic: A structural approach to a literary genre. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve.Google Scholar
  33. Tolkien, J. R. R. (1966). Tree and leaf. En The Tolkien reader (pp. 1–84). New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  34. Vallbona, R. De. (1992). La tejedora de palabras. En Los infiernos de la mujer y algo más (pp. 11–21). Madrid: Torremozas.Google Scholar
  35. Villalobos, C. M. (2001) La paradoja de la mujer escindida en la cuentística de Rima de Vallbona. En J. Chen Sham (Ed.), Nuevos acercamientos a la obra de Rima de Vallbona (pp. 93–104). San José: Perro Azul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spanish and Latin American Studies, Department of Modern LanguagesUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations