Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Volumetric growth rate of incidentally found meningiomas on immunotherapy

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The expression of PD-L1 in high-grade meningiomas made it a potential target for immunotherapy research in refractory cases. Several prospective studies in this field are still on going. We sought to retrospectively investigate the effects of check-point inhibitors (CI) on meningiomas that had been naïve to either surgical or radiation approaches by following incidental meningiomas found during treatment with CI for various primary metastatic cancers.

Methods

We used the NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center Data Hub to find patients treated by CI for various cancers, who also had serial computerized-tomography (CT) or magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) reports of intracranial meningiomas. Meningioma volumetric measurements were compared between the beginning and end of the CI treatment period. Patients treated with chemotherapy during this period were excluded.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included in our study, of which 14 (56%) were on CI for melanoma, 5 (20%) for non-small-cell lung cancer and others. CI therapies included nivolumab (n = 15, 60%), ipilimumab (n = 11, 44%) and pembrolizumab (n = 9, %36), while 9 (36%) were on ipilimumab/nivolumab combination. We did not find any significant difference between tumor volumes before and after treatment with CI (1.31 ± 0.46 vs. 1.34 ± 0.46, p=0.8, respectively). Among patients beyond 1 year of follow-up (n = 13), annual growth was 0.011 ± 0.011 cm3/year. Five patients showed minor volume reduction of 0.12 ± 0.10 cm3 (21 ± 6% from baseline). We did not find significant predictors of tumor volume reduction.

Conclusion

Check-point inhibitors may impact the natural history of meningiomas. Additional research is needed to define potential clinical indications and treatment goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Islim AI, Mohan M, Moon RDC et al (2019) Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes. J Neurooncol 142:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03104-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel B, Desai R, Pugazenthi S et al (2022) Identification and management of aggressive meningiomas. Front Oncol 12

  4. Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M et al (2016) EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol 17:e383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30321-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun SQ, Hawasli AH, Huang J et al (2015) An evidence-based treatment algorithm for the management of WHO Grade II and III meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 38:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M et al (2015) Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 122:4–23. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS131644

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shahbandi A, Shah DS, Hadley CC, Patel AJ (2023) The role of Pharmacotherapy in Treatment of Meningioma: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 15:483. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalluri AL, Shah PP, Lim M (2023) The Tumor Immune Microenvironment in primary CNS Neoplasms: a review of current knowledge and therapeutic approaches. Int J Mol Sci 24:2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Han SJ, Reis G, Kohanbash G et al (2016) Expression and prognostic impact of immune modulatory molecule PD-L1 in meningioma. J Neurooncol 130:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2256-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Karimi S, Mansouri S, Mamatjan Y et al (2020) Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in meningioma; prognostic significance and its association with hypoxia and NFKB2 expression. Sci Rep 10:14115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70514-z

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li YD, Veliceasa D, Lamano JB et al (2019) Systemic and local immunosuppression in patients with high-grade meningiomas. Cancer Immunol Immunother 68:999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-019-02342-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Karimi S, Mansouri S, Nassiri F et al (2021) Clinical significance of checkpoint regulator programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in meningioma: review of the current status. J Neurooncol 151:443–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03584-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelerstein E, Berger A, Jonas-Kimchi T et al (2017) Regression of intracranial meningioma following treatment with nivolumab: case report and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 37:51–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunn IF, Du Z, Touat M et al (2018) Mismatch Repair Deficiency in High-Grade Meningioma: a rare but recurrent event Associated with dramatic Immune activation and clinical response to PD-1 blockade. JCO Precision Oncology 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00190

  15. Bi WL, Nayak L, Meredith DM et al (2022) Activity of PD-1 blockade with nivolumab among patients with recurrent atypical/anaplastic meningioma: phase II trial results. Neuro Oncol 24:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aquilanti E, Brastianos PK (2020) Immune Checkpoint inhibitors for Brain metastases: a primer for neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery 87:E281–E288. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Behbahani M, Skeie GO, Eide GE et al (2019) A prospective study of the natural history of incidental meningioma—hold your horses! Neuro-Oncology Pract 6:438–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npz011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Delgado-López PD, Montalvo-Afonso A, Martín-Alonso J et al (2021) Volumetric growth rate of incidental asymptomatic meningiomas: a single-center prospective cohort study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163:1665–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04815-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Li S, Yao Q et al (2020) The efficacy and safety of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab): a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 18:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01933-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson MD (2018) PD-L1 expression in meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 57:149–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang RY, Bi WL, Weller M et al (2019) Proposed response assessment and endpoints for meningioma clinical trials: report from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. Neuro Oncol 21:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nidamanuri P, Drappatz J (2022) Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for recurrent meningiomas: a retrospective chart review. J Neurooncol 157:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-03979-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheehan J, Pikis S, Islim AI et al (2021) An international multicenter matched cohort analysis of incidental meningioma progression during active surveillance or after stereotactic radiosurgery: the IMPASSE study. Neuro Oncol 24:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab132

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Megan D. Winner, MD, Victoria Lam, MS and Teija Hebshibah, MS from the Perlmutter Cancer Center Data Hub for providing support and data access for the purpose of this study.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB and RM contributed to the study conception and design, data preparation and analysis were performed by AB, RM, KB and EM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AB and RM and all authors reviewed previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assaf Berger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the NYU Langone Health Institutional Review Board.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berger, A., Mullen, R., Bernstein, K. et al. Volumetric growth rate of incidentally found meningiomas on immunotherapy. J Neurooncol 166, 303–307 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04558-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04558-2

Keywords

Navigation