Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of expanded endoscopic approaches on oncologic and functional outcomes for clival malignancies:a case series

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Clival malignancies pose particular surgical challenges due to complex skull base anatomy and the involvement of vital neurovascular structures. While endoscopic endonasal approached are widely used, the outcomes for clival malignancies remain poorly understood. In this study we assessed the impact of endoscopic and open surgical approaches on PFS, time to initiation of radiotherapy, KPS, and GTR rates for clival malignancies.

Methods

A retrospective case series for clival malignancies operated between 1993 and 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 and a follow-up of at least a 6 months. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 15 statistical software package StataCorp.

Results

For the whole cohort (113 patients), and for upper and middle lesions, open surgical approaches increased odds of disease progression, compared to EEA (HR 2.10 to HR 2.43), p < 0.05. EEA had a shorter time interval from surgery to initiation of radiotherapy. No difference in 6 and 12 month KPS was found between surgical groups. Patients undergoing open surgery were less likely to achieve GTR for upper clival lesions.

Conclusions

EEA was found to be associated with increased PFS, for upper and middle clival malignancies. The time to initiation of radiotherapy was shorter for patients undergoing EEA compared to open surgery for patients with middle clival involvement. GTR rates were found to be significantly better with EEA for patients with upper clival malignancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EEA,:

Expanded endoscopic approaches

GTR,:

Gross total resection

KPS,:

Karnofsky Performance Score

PFS,:

Progression free survival

OR,:

Odds ratio

PET,:

Positron emission tomography

CT,:

Computed tomography

CCJ,:

Craniocervical junction

References

  1. Mohyeldin A, Prevedello DM, Jamshidi AO, Ditzel Filho LF, Carrau RL (2014) Nuances in the treatment of malignant tumors of the clival and petroclival region. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18(Suppl 2):S157–S172. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395267 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Snyderman CH, Wang EW, Zenonos GA, Gardner PA (2020) Reconstruction after endoscopic surgery for skull base malignancies. J Neurooncol 150(3):463–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03465-0 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L et al (2017) Clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with skull base chordoma: a retrospective analysis of 238 patients. J Neurosurg 127(6):1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16559 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tzortzidis F, Elahi F, Wright D, Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN (2006) "Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chordomas. Neurosurgery 59(2):230–237. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000223441.51012.9D (discussion 230-7 in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tzortzidis F, Elahi F, Wright DC, Temkin N, Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN (2006) "Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 58(6):1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000215892.65663.54 (discussion 1090-8, in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Passer JZ, Alvarez-Breckenridge C, Rhines L, DeMonte F, Tatsui C, Raza SM (2021) "Surgical management of skull base and spine chordomas. Curr Treat Options Oncol 22(5):40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-021-00838-z (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raza SM, Gidley PW, Kupferman ME, Hanna EY, Su SY, DeMonte F (2018) Site-specific considerations in the surgical management of skull base chondrosarcomas. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 14(6):611–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx171 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raza SM, Bell D, Freeman JL, Grosshans DR, Fuller GN, DeMonte F (2018) "Multimodality management of recurrent skull base chordomas: factors impacting tumor control and disease-specific survival. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 15(2):131–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx2019 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raza SM, Gidley PW, Meis JM, Grosshans DR, Bell D, DeMonte F (2017) "Multimodality treatment of skull base chondrosarcomas: the role of histology specific treatment protocols. Neurosurgery 81(3):520–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx042 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta GU, DeMonte F, Su SY, Kupferman ME, Hanna EY, Raza SM (2018) "Endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid transnasopharyngeal management of petroclival chondrosarcomas without medial extension. J Neurosurg 131(1):184–191. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.3.JNS172722 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Mefty O, Kadri PA, Hasan DM, Isolan GR, Pravdenkova S (2008) "Anterior clivectomy: surgical technique and clinical applications. J Neurosurg 109(5):783–793. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/11/0783 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feiz-Erfan I et al (2008) "Proposed classification for the transbasal approach and its modifications. Skull Base 18(1):29–47. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994292 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. DeMonte F, Diaz E, Callender D, Suk I (2001) Transmandibular, circumglossal, retropharyngeal approach for chordomas of the clivus and upper cervical spine technical note. Neurosurg Focus 10(3):10. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2001.10.3.11 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harsh GR, Sekhar LN (1992) "The subtemporal, transcavernous, anterior transpetrosal approach to the upper brain stem and clivus. J Neurosurg 77(5):709–717. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.77.5.0709 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sen C (1996) "The transcondylar approach to the lower clivus, foramen magnum and C1–C2. Clin Neurosurg 43:113–126 (in Eng)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R (2005) "Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 19(1):E6 (in Eng)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaz-Guimaraes F et al (2017) "Endoscopic endonasal surgery for cranial base chondrosarcomas. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 13(4):421–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx020 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bai J et al (2021) "Endoscopic endonasal surgical strategy for skull base chordomas based on tumor growth directions: surgical outcomes of 167 patients during 3 years. Front Oncol 11:724972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.724972 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Valappil B (2021) "Experience with the endoscopic contralateral transmaxillary approach to the petroclival skull base. Laryngoscope 131(2):294–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28740 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carrabba G, Dehdashti AR, Gentili F (2008) "Surgery for clival lesions: open resection versus the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus 25(6):E7. https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC.2008.25.12.E7 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hardesty DA et al (2021) "Complications after 1002 endoscopic endonasal approach procedures at a single center: lessons learned, 2010-2018. J Neurosurg 136:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.11.JNS202494 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel CR, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH (2018) "Contralateral transmaxillary corridor: an augmented endoscopic approach to the petrous apex. J Neurosurg 129(1):211–219. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.4.JNS162483 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2011) "The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas. World Neurosurg 76(3–4):318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.026 (discussion 259-62 in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cannizzaro D et al (2021) "Microsurgical versus endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approaches for clivus chordoma: a pooled and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 44(3):1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01318-y (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang EW et al (2019) "ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(S3):S145–S365. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22326 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Funaki T, Matsushima T, Peris-Celda M, Valentine RJ, Joo W, Rhoton AL (2013) "Focal transnasal approach to the upper, middle, and lower clivus. Neurosurgery 73(2 Suppl Operative):155–159. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000431469.82215.93 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morera VA et al (2010) " “Far-medial” expanded endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus: the transcondylar and transjugular tubercle approaches. Neurosurgery 66(6):211–219. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000369926.01891.5D (discussion 219-20 in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, London NR, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL (2020) "Endonasal endoscopic transpterygoid approach to the upper parapharyngeal space. Head Neck 42(9):2734–2740. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26127 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Labib MA et al (2020) "The endoscopic endonasal eustachian tube anterolateral mobilization strategy: minimizing the cost of the extreme-medial approach. J Neurosurg 134(3):831–842. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.JNS192285 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Landriel Ibañez FA et al (2011) "A new classification of complications in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 75(5–6):709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.11.010 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Di Maio S, Rostomily R, Sekhar LN (2012) "Current surgical outcomes for cranial base chordomas: cohort study of 95 patients. Neurosurgery 70(6):1355–1360. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182446783 (discussion 1360, in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jahangiri A et al (2015) "Factors predicting recurrence after resection of clival chordoma using variable surgical approaches and radiation modalities. Neurosurgery 76(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000611 (discussion 185-6 in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cavallo LM et al (2020) "The management of clival chordomas: an Italian multicentric study. J Neurosurg 135:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.5.JNS20925 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim YH et al (2018) "Clinical outcomes of an endoscopic transclival and transpetrosal approach for primary skull base malignancies involving the clivus. J Neurosurg 128(5):1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.12.JNS161920 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. George B, Archilli M, Cornelius JF (2006) "Bone tumors at the cranio-cervical junction. Surgical management and results from a series of 41 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(7):741–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0789-2 (in Eng)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi D, Melcher R, Harms J, Crockard A (2010) "Outcome of 132 operations in 97 patients with chordomas of the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine. Neurosurgery 66(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000362000.35742.3D (discussion 65 in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Colli BO, Al-Mefty O (2001) "Chordomas of the skull base: follow-up review and prognostic factors. Neurosurg Focus 10(3):E1. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2001.10.3.2 (in Eng)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yasuda M et al (2012) "Chordomas of the skull base and cervical spine: clinical outcomes associated with a multimodal surgical resection combined with proton-beam radiation in 40 patients. Neurosurg Rev 35(2):171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-011-0334-5 (discussion 182-3 in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fava A et al (2021) "Endoscope-assisted far-lateral transcondylar approach for craniocervical junction chordomas: a retrospective case series and cadaveric dissection. J Neurosurg 04(02):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.9.JNS202611 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwartz DL et al (2002) "The effect of delayed postoperative irradiation on local control of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity and torso. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52(5):1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02807-3 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sahgal A et al (2015) "Image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) for skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma: preliminary outcomes. Neuro Oncol 17(6):889–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou347 (in Eng)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Freeman JL et al (2018) "Impact of early access to multidisciplinary care on treatment outcomes in patients with skull base chordoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160(4):731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3409-4 (in Eng)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Diaz RJ, Maggacis N, Zhang S, Cusimano MD (2014) "Determinants of quality of life in patients with skull base chordoma. J Neurosurg 120(2):528–537. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.JNS13671 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Grosshans DR et al (2014) "Spot scanning proton therapy for malignancies of the base of skull: treatment planning, acute toxicities, and preliminary clinical outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90(3):540–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.005 (in Eng)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

“The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

“All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Solon Schur, Joel Z. Passer, and Shaan Raza. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Solon Schur and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaan M. Raza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schur, S., Passer, J.Z., Hanna, E.Y. et al. The impact of expanded endoscopic approaches on oncologic and functional outcomes for clival malignancies:a case series. J Neurooncol 159, 627–635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04103-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04103-7

Keywords

Navigation