Skip to main content
Log in

Recycling of SLC38A1 to the plasma membrane by DSCR3 promotes acquired temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary brain tumor with devastating prognosis. Although the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) leads to inherent temozolomide (TMZ) resistance, approximately half of GBMs were sufficient to confer acquired TMZ resistance, which express low levels of MGMT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanisms of the acquired TMZ resistance in MGMT-deficient GBM.

Methods

The function of Down syndrome critical region protein 3 (DSCR3) on MGMT-deficient GBM was investigated in vitro and in an orthotopic brain tumor model in mice. Purification of plasma membrane proteins by membrane-cytoplasmic separation and subsequent label free-based quantitative proteomics were used to identified potential protein partners for DSCR3. Immunofluorescence was performed to show the reverse transport of solute carrier family 38 member 1 (SLC38A1) mediated by DSCR3.

Results

DSCR3 is upregulated in MGMT-deficient GBM cells during TMZ treatment. Both DSCR3 and SLC38A1 were highly expressed in recurrent GBM patients. Silencing DSCR3 or SLC38A1 expression can increase TMZ sensitivity in MGMT-deficient GBM cells. Combination of proteomics and in vitro experiments show that DSCR3 directly binds internalized SLC38A1 to mediate its sorting into recycling pathway, which maintains the abundance on plasma membrane and enhances uptake of glutamine in MGMT-deficient GBM cells.

Conclusions

DSCR3 is a crucial regulator of acquired TMZ resistance in MGMT-deficient GBM. The DSCR3-dependent recycling of SLC38A1 maintains its abundance on plasma membrane, leading to tumor progression and acquired TMZ resistance in MGMT-deficient GBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Alexander BM, Cloughesy TF (2017) Adult glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 35(21):2402–2409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tan AC et al (2020) Management of glioblastoma: state of the art and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin 70(4):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Omuro A et al (2018) Multicenter phase IB trial of carboxyamidotriazole orotate and temozolomide for recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma and other anaplastic gliomas. J Clin Oncol 36(17):1702–1709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomar MS et al (2021) Elucidating the mechanisms of temozolomide resistance in gliomas and the strategies to overcome the resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1876(2):188616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wick W et al (2014) MGMT testing—the challenges for biomarker-based glioma treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 10(7):372–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy SF et al (2016) Connexin 43 inhibition sensitizes chemoresistant glioblastoma cells to temozolomide. Cancer Res 76(1):139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen K et al (2019) Stimuli-responsive polymer-doxorubicin conjugate: antitumor mechanism and potential as nano-prodrug. Acta Biomater 84:339–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raote I, Malhotra V (2019) Protein transport by vesicles and tunnels. J Cell Biol 218(3):737–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Foot N, Henshall T, Kumar S (2017) Ubiquitination and the regulation of membrane proteins. Physiol Rev 97(1):253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo J et al (2020) Quantitative proteomics analysis reveals nuclear perturbation in human glioma U87 cells treated with temozolomide. Cell Biochem Funct 38(2):185–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McNally KE et al (2017) Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat Cell Biol 19(10):1214–1225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen KE, Healy MD, Collins BM (2019) Towards a molecular understanding of endosomal trafficking by retromer and retriever. Traffic 20(7):465–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yi GZ et al (2019) Acquired temozolomide resistance in MGMT-deficient glioblastoma cells is associated with regulation of DNA repair by DHC2. Brain 142(8):2352–2366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Broer A, Rahimi F, Broer S (2016) Deletion of amino acid transporter ASCT2 (SLC1A5) reveals an essential role for transporters SNAT1 (SLC38A1) and SNAT2 (SLC38A2) to sustain glutaminolysis in cancer cells. J Biol Chem 291(25):13194–13205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zavorka Thomas ME et al (2021) Gilteritinib inhibits glutamine uptake and utilization in FLT3-ITD-positive AML. Mol Cancer Ther 20(11):2207–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan R et al (2009) Targeting tumorigenesis: development and use of mTOR inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol 2:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murugan AK (2019) mTOR: role in cancer, metastasis and drug resistance. Semin Cancer Biol 59:92–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gremke N et al (2020) mTOR-mediated cancer drug resistance suppresses autophagy and generates a druggable metabolic vulnerability. Nat Commun 11(1):4684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicklin P et al (2009) Bidirectional transport of amino acids regulates mTOR and autophagy. Cell 136(3):521–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jewell JL et al (2015) Metabolism. Differential regulation of mTORC1 by leucine and glutamine. Science 347(6218):194–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weller M et al (2010) MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine? Nat Rev Neurol 6(1):39–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu W et al (2019) O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT): challenges and new opportunities in glioma chemotherapy. Front Oncol 9:1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Doherty GJ, McMahon HT (2009) Mechanisms of endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem 78:857–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ju Y et al (2020) Application of advances in endocytosis and membrane trafficking to drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 157:118–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saftig P, Klumperman J (2009) Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: trafficking meets function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(9):623–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Claus LAN, Savatin DV, Russinova E (2018) The crossroads of receptor-mediated signaling and endocytosis in plants. J Integr Plant Biol 60(9):827–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith SM, Renden R, von Gersdorff H (2008) Synaptic vesicle endocytosis: fast and slow modes of membrane retrieval. Trends Neurosci 31(11):559–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhutia YD, Ganapathy V (2016) Glutamine transporters in mammalian cells and their functions in physiology and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863(10):2531–2539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cha YJ, Kim ES, Koo JS (2018) Amino acid transporters and glutamine metabolism in breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci 19(3):907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kandasamy P et al (2018) Amino acid transporters revisited: new views in health and disease. Trends Biochem Sci 43(10):752–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Qureshi T et al (2019) The glutamine transporter Slc38a1 regulates GABAergic neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. Cereb Cortex 29(12):5166–5179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cruzat V et al (2018) Glutamine: metabolism and immune function, supplementation and clinical translation. Nutrients 10(11):1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang L, Venneti S, Nagrath D (2017) Glutaminolysis: a hallmark of cancer metabolism. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:163–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuhn KS et al (2010) Glutamine as indispensable nutrient in oncology: experimental and clinical evidence. Eur J Nutr 49(4):197–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Biswas SK (2015) Metabolic reprogramming of immune cells in cancer progression. Immunity 43(3):435–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Teixeira E, Silva C, Martel F (2021) The role of the glutamine transporter ASCT2 in antineoplastic therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 87(4):447–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fu S et al (2019) Glutamine synthetase promotes radiation resistance via facilitating nucleotide metabolism and subsequent DNA damage repair. Cell Rep 28(5):1136-1143e4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Covarrubias AJ, Aksoylar HI, Horng T (2015) Control of macrophage metabolism and activation by mTOR and Akt signaling. Semin Immunol 27(4):286–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang SH et al (2017) Increased serotonin signaling contributes to the Warburg effect in pancreatic tumor cells under metabolic stress and promotes growth of pancreatic tumors in mice. Gastroenterology 153(1):277-291e19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Martinez-Outschoorn UE et al (2017) Cancer metabolism: a therapeutic perspective. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14(1):11–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81803100), Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2018B090906001), Outstanding Youth Development Scheme of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (2019J002) and Young innovative talents in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province (2021KQNCX022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RL was the major contributor in experiments performing and manuscript writing. YX was the major contributor in experiments performing. YL and S-TQ were the contributors of the design of the study. SX, YZ, BN, G-ZY and GH were the major contributors in data acquisition and specimen collection. SX, YZ, HW, BN, HS, ZW were contributors in experiments performing and analysis presentation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Song-Tao Qi or Yawei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Ethics of animal and human research subjects has been reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University. Animal care complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. For patient material, written consent will be sought from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their anonymized data and photographs.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16.3 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 826.0 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, R., Xu, Y., Xie, S. et al. Recycling of SLC38A1 to the plasma membrane by DSCR3 promotes acquired temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 157, 15–26 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-03964-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-03964-2

Keywords

Navigation