Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long term outcomes following surgery for pineal region tumors

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pineal region tumors are surgically demanding tumors to resect. Long term neuro-oncologic outcomes following surgical excision of tumors from this region have been underreported. We sought to define the long term outcomes of patients undergoing resection of pineal region tumors.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed on patients who underwent intended surgical excision of pineal region tumors. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoints of this study. Factors associated with OS, PFS and the degree of resection were analyzed, along with 30-day complication rates and dependence on CSF diversion.

Results

Sixty-eight patients with a mean age of 30.9 ± 15.3 years were analyzed. The median clinical and radiographic follow-up was 95.7 and 48.2 months, respectively. The supracerebellar infratentorial and the occipital transtentorial corridors were utilized in the majority of cases (80.9%). The gross total resection (GTR) rate was 52.9% (n=36). The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 70.2% and 58.5%, respectively. Achieving GTR was associated with improved OS (HR 0.39, p = 0.03) and PFS (HR 0.4, p = 0.006). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.9%. The need for CSF diversion was high with 77.9% of patients requiring a shunt or ETV by last follow-up.

Conclusions

This is the first modern surgical series providing long term follow-up for patients undergoing surgical resection of pineal region tumors. Obtaining a GTR of these challenging tumors is beneficial with regards to PFS/OS. Higher grade tumors have diminished PFS/OS and are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors confirm the appropriateness of all datasets and software used for supporting the conclusion.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Abecassis IJ, Hanak B, Barber J, Mortazavi M, Ellenbogen RG (2017) A single-institution experience with pineal region tumors: 50 tumors over 1 decade. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 13(5):566–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia W, Ma Z, Liu IY, Zhang Y, Jia G, Wan W (2011) Transcallosal interforniceal approach to pineal region tumors in 150 children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7(1):98–103. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.10.PEDS0976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI (2003) Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol 59(4):250–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00080-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Franceschi E, Frappaz D, Ruda R et al (2020) Rare primary central nervous system tumors in adults: an overview. Front Oncol 10:996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00996

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao X, Belykh E, Przybylowski CJ et al (2019) Surgical treatment of falcotentorial meningiomas: a retrospective review of a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.JNS19208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mottolese C, Szathmari A, Ricci-Franchi AC, Beuriat PA, Grassiot B (2015) The sub-occipital transtentorial approach revisited base on our own experience. Neurochirurgie 61(2–3):168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mottolese C, Szathmari A, Ricci-Franchi AC, Gallo P, Beuriat PA, Capone G (2015) Supracerebellar infratentorial approach for pineal region tumors: our surgical and technical considerations. Neurochirurgie 61(2–3):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.02.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliveira J, Cerejo A, Silva PS, Polonia P, Pereira J, Vaz R (2013) The infratentorial supracerebellar approach in surgery of lesions of the pineal region. Surg Neurol Int 4:154. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.122504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sonabend AM, Bowden S, Bruce JN (2016) Microsurgical resection of pineal region tumors. J Neurooncol 130(2):351–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2138-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruce JN, Stein BM (1995) Surgical management of pineal region tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 134(3–4):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Albayrak BS et al (2008) Microsurgical management of pineal region lesions: personal experience with 119 patients. Surg Neurol 70(6):576–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Little KM, Friedman AH, Fukushima T (2001) Surgical approaches to pineal region tumors. J Neurooncol 54(3):287–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012766902431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi S, Fan J, Zhang XA, Zhang H, Qiu B, Fang L (2014) Radical resection of nongerminomatous pineal region tumors via the occipital transtentorial approach based on arachnoidal consideration: experience on a series of 143 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(12):2253–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2224-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edson MA, Fuller GN, Allen PK et al (2015) Outcomes after surgery and radiotherapy for papillary tumor of the pineal region. World Neurosurg 84(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dagnew E, Langford LA, Lang FF, DeMonte F (2007) Papillary tumors of the pineal region: case report. Neurosurgery 60(5):E953–E955. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000255443.44365.77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaki VN, Solla DJF, Ribeiro RR, da Silva SA, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG (2019) Papillary tumor of the pineal region: systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Neurosurgery 85(3):E420–E429. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nam JY, Gilbert A, Cachia D et al (2020) Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: a single-institution experience. Neurooncol Pract 7(6):613–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tate M, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ et al (2012) The long-term postsurgical prognosis of patients with pineoblastoma. Cancer 118(1):173–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pendi G (1984) The surgery of pineal lesions-historical perspective. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oppenheim HKF (1913) Operative Erfolge bei Geschwülsten der Sehhügel und Vierhügelgegend. Berlin Klin Wschr 50:2316–2322

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Syed HR, Jean WC (2018) A novel method to measure the tentorial angle and the implications on surgeries of the pineal region. World Neurosurg 111:e213–e220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wildeman ME, Shepard MJ, Oldfield EH, Lopes MBS (2018) Central nervous system germinomas express programmed death ligand 1. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 77(4):312–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nly008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka S, Meyer FB, Buckner JC, Uhm JH, Yan ES, Parney IF (2013) Presentation, management, and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in elderly patients. J Neurosurg 118(4):786–798. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.JNS112268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by MJS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MJS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick F. Lang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Informed consent

This study was performed after Institutional Review Board approval; the requirement for consent was waived for this retrospective analysis of an existing database.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX 54 KB)

Supplementary Material 2 (TIF 118 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shepard, M.J., Haider, A.S., Prabhu, S.S. et al. Long term outcomes following surgery for pineal region tumors. J Neurooncol 156, 491–498 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03919-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03919-z

Keywords

Navigation