Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of race and socioeconomic status on therapeutic clinical trial screening and enrollment

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Under-enrollment in clinical trials significantly limits valid analyses of clinical interventions and generalizability of findings. Often it results in premature study termination, with estimates of 22% to 50% of clinical trials terminated due to poor accrual. Currently, there are limited reports addressing the influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on clinical trial enrollment in adult glioma patients. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that race and socioeconomic status negatively impact therapeutic clinical trial enrollment.

Methods

988 adult patients were identified from the UCSF Tumor Board Registry and analyzed to determine the rate of therapeutic clinical trial screening and study enrollment.

Results

At initial diagnosis, 43.6% and 17.5% of glioma patients were screened and enrolled in a therapeutic clinical trial, respectively. At recurrence, 49.8% and 26.3% of patients were screened and enrolled in a clinical trial, respectively. Thirty-three percent of the study population belonged to a NIH-designated underrepresented minority group; Asian/Pacific-Islander comprised 19.6% of the overall cohort. On univariate analysis, only in-state location, distance to the hospital, and WHO grade were associated with enrollment at initial diagnosis and recurrence. Minority status, insurance type, median household income, and percent below poverty were not associated with clinical trial enrollment.

Conclusion

Minority and socioeconomic status did not impact adult glioma clinical trial enrollment. Proximity to the tertiary care cancer center may be an important consideration for minority patients. Patient screening should be carefully considered in order to avoid bias based on minority and socioeconomic status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamel LM, Penner LA, Albrecht TL et al (2016) Barriers to clinical trial enrollment in racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. Cancer Control 23:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327481602300404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C et al (2016) Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials 17:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1105-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. NIH (2001) Guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. National Institue of Health, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freedman LS, Simon R, Foulkes MA et al (1995) Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993–the perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Control Clin Trials 16(277–279):293–309

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P et al (2017) CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010–2014. Neuro Oncol 19:v1–v88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang SM, Barker FG 2nd, Schmidt MH et al (2002) Clinical trial participation among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcomes Project. Cancer 94:2681–2687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Field KM, Drummond KJ, Yilmaz M et al (2013) Clinical trial participation and outcome for patients with glioblastoma: Multivariate analysis from a comprehensive dataset. J Clin Neurosci 20:783–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.09.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwiatkowski K, Coe K, Bailar JC, Swanson GM (2013) Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: Have we improved? Cancer 119:2956–2963. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng SK, Dietrich MS, Dilts DM (2010) A sense of urgency: evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI-CTEP) sponsored studies. Clin Cancer Res 16:5557–5563. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Korn EL, Freidlin B, Mooney M, Abrams JS (2010) Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007. J Clin Oncol 28:5197–5201. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Massett HA, Mishkin G, Rubinstein L et al (2016) Challenges facing early phase trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: an analysis of corrective action plans to improve accrual. Clin Cancer Res 22:5408–5416. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0338

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang C, Sherman SI, Price M et al (2017) Clinical trial characteristics and barriers to participant accrual: the MD Anderson cancer center experience over 30 years, a historical foundation for trial improvement. Clin Cancer Res 23:1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ammanuel SG, Edwards CS, Alhadi R, Hervey-Jumper SL (2019) Readability of online neuro-oncology-related patient education materials from tertiary-care academic centers. World Neurosurg S1878–8750(19):32949–32953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandra A, Rick JW, Dalle Ore C et al (2018) Disparities in health care determine prognosis in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neurosurg Focus 44:E16. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.3.FOCUS1852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Howerton MW, Gibbons MC, Baffi CR et al (2007) Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Cancer 109:465–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon MS, Du W, Flaherty L et al (2004) Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol 22:2046–2052. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabin JA, Rivara FP, Greenwald AG (2008) Physician implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race and quality of medical care. Med Care 46:678–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181653d58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shavers VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF (2002) Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Ann Epidemiol 12:248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00265-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP et al (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21:1383–1389. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. J Am Med Assoc 291:2720–2726. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tejeda HA, Green SB, Trimble EL et al (1996) Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:812–816. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhargava A, Du XL (2009) Racial and socioeconomic disparities in adjuvant chemotherapy for older women with lymph node-positive, operable breast cancer. Cancer 115:2999–3009. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24363

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz K, Powell IJ, Underwood W et al (2009) Interplay of race, socioeconomic status, and treatment on survival of patients with prostate cancer. Urology 74:1296–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jimenez R, Zhang B, Joffe S et al (2013) Clinical trial participation among ethnic/racial minority and majority patients with advanced cancer: what factors most influence enrollment? J Palliat Med 16:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1968 to 2018 Annual Social and Economic Supplements. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2018/demo/p60-263/figure1.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This study was funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant No. 74259).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest/disclosure.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morshed, R.A., Reihl, S.J., Molinaro, A.M. et al. The influence of race and socioeconomic status on therapeutic clinical trial screening and enrollment. J Neurooncol 148, 131–139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03503-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03503-x

Keywords

Navigation