Skip to main content

Weak MGMT gene promoter methylation confers a clinically significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study

Journal of Neuro-Oncology volume 146, pages 55–62 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) is a frequently used technique to assess MGMT gene promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients. The optimal technical cut-off value to distinguish methylated from unmethylated samples is nevertheless still undetermined. In literature, a “grey zone” of diagnostic uncertainty has been described.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated according to the Stupp protocol. Epidemiological data were gathered from the individual patient files. MGMT gene promoter methylation status was determined on stored tumour samples using qMSP. A strong, weak or absent promoter methylation was determined based on Cq values (quantification value) of the MGMT and ACTB primers as well as a positive control sample.

Results

In total, 181 patient files were reviewed and included for statistical analysis. MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 38.7% of glioblastoma patients. The median overall survival of unmethylated and strongly methylated patients was 10.1 months and 19.7 months respectively. Furthermore, 11% of the total patient cohort had a weak MGMT gene promoter methylation. The median OS in this subgroup was 15.4 months, significantly better compared to the unmethylated cohort (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed weak MGMT promoter methylation as an independent prognostic parameter for overall survival.

Conclusion

Glioblastoma patients with weak promoter methylation show a statistically significant longer overall survival when compared to clearly unmethylated patients. Patients with grey zone qMSP test results should receive additional molecular analysis in future to further direct individual therapy strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Rouse C, Chen Y, Dowling J, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan J (2014) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro Oncol 16(Suppl 4):iv1–iv63. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA, Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Mirimanoff RO, European Organisation for R, Treatment of Cancer Brain T, Radiation Oncology G, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials G (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO, European Organisation for R, Treatment of Cancer Brain T, Radiotherapy G, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials G (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Newlands ES, Stevens MF, Wedge SR, Wheelhouse RT, Brock C (1997) Temozolomide: a review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev 23:35–61

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043331

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris LC, Potter PM, Tano K, Shiota S, Mitra S, Brent TP (1991) Characterization of the promoter region of the human O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene. Nucleic Acids Res 19:6163–6167. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/19.22.6163

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris LC, Remack JS, Brent TP (1994) Identification of a 59 bp enhancer located at the first exon/intron boundary of the human O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4614–4619. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4614

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakagawachi T, Soejima H, Urano T, Zhao W, Higashimoto K, Satoh Y, Matsukura S, Kudo S, Kitajima Y, Harada H, Furukawa K, Matsuzaki H, Emi M, Nakabeppu Y, Miyazaki K, Sekiguchi M, Mukai T (2003) Silencing effect of CpG island hypermethylation and histone modifications on O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene expression in human cancer. Oncogene 22:8835–8844. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207183

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malley DS, Hamoudi RA, Kocialkowski S, Pearson DM, Collins VP, Ichimura K (2011) A distinct region of the MGMT CpG island critical for transcriptional regulation is preferentially methylated in glioblastoma cells and xenografts. Acta Neuropathol 121:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0803-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quillien V, Lavenu A, Karayan-Tapon L, Carpentier C, Labussiere M, Lesimple T, Chinot O, Wager M, Honnorat J, Saikali S, Fina F, Sanson M, Figarella-Branger D (2012) Comparative assessment of 5 methods (methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, MethyLight, pyrosequencing, methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting, and immunohistochemistry) to analyze O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltranferase in a series of 100 glioblastoma patients. Cancer 118:4201–4211. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27392

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mansouri A, Hachem LD, Mansouri S, Nassiri F, Laperriere NJ, Xia D, Lindeman NI, Wen PY, Chakravarti A, Mehta MP, Hegi ME, Stupp R, Aldape KD, Zadeh G (2018) MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy132

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hegi ME, Genbrugge E, Gorlia T, Stupp R, Gilbert MR, Chinot OL, Nabors LB, Jones G, Van Criekinge W, Straub J, Weller M (2019) MGMT promoter methylation cutoff with safety margin for selecting glioblastoma patients into trials omitting temozolomide: a pooled analysis of four clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res 25:1809–1816. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vlassenbroeck I, Califice S, Diserens AC, Migliavacca E, Straub J, Di Stefano I, Moreau F, Hamou MF, Renard I, Delorenzi M, Flamion B, DiGuiseppi J, Bierau K, Hegi ME (2008) Validation of real-time methylation-specific PCR to determine O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene promoter methylation in glioma. J Mol Diagn 10:332–337. https://doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070169

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Decock A, Ongenaert M, Hoebeeck J, De Preter K, Van Peer G, Van Criekinge W, Ladenstein R, Schulte JH, Noguera R, Stallings RL, Van Damme A, Laureys G, Vermeulen J, Van Maerken T, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2012) Genome-wide promoter methylation analysis in neuroblastoma identifies prognostic methylation biomarkers. Genome Biol 13:R95. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r95

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Esteller M, Hamilton SR, Burger PC, Baylin SB, Herman JG (1999) Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res 59:793–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malmstrom A, Gronberg BH, Marosi C, Stupp R, Frappaz D, Schultz H, Abacioglu U, Tavelin B, Lhermitte B, Hegi ME, Rosell J, Henriksson R, Nordic Clinical Brain Tumour Study G (2012) Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:916–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70265-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gorlia T, Erridge SC, Perry J, Hong YK, Aldape KD, Lhermitte B, Pietsch T, Grujicic D, Steinbach JP, Wick W, Tarnawski R, Nam DH, Hau P, Weyerbrock A, Taphoorn MJ, Shen CC, Rao N, Thurzo L, Herrlinger U, Gupta T, Kortmann RD, Adamska K, McBain C, Brandes AA, Tonn JC, Schnell O, Wiegel T, Kim CY, Nabors LB, Reardon DA, van den Bent MJ, Hicking C, Markivskyy A, Picard M, Weller M, European Organisation for R, Treatment of C, Canadian Brain Tumor C, Team Cs (2014) Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071–22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1100–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70379-1

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, Read W, Steinberg D, Lhermitte B, Toms S, Idbaih A, Ahluwalia MS, Fink K, Di Meco F, Lieberman F, Zhu JJ, Stragliotto G, Tran D, Brem S, Hottinger A, Kirson ED, Lavy-Shahaf G, Weinberg U, Kim CY, Paek SH, Nicholas G, Bruna J, Hirte H, Weller M, Palti Y, Hegi ME, Ram Z (2017) Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:2306–2316. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18718

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Herrlinger U, Schafer N, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Maciaczyk J, Grau S, Schnell O, Hanel M, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Gerlach R, Kortmann RD, Mehdorn M, Tuttenberg J, Mayer-Steinacker R, Fietkau R, Brehmer S, Mack F, Stuplich M, Kebir S, Kohnen R, Dunkl E, Leutgeb B, Proescholdt M, Pietsch T, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M (2016) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan versus temozolomide in newly diagnosed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase nonmethylated glioblastoma: the randomized GLARIUS trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia D, Reardon DA, Bruce JL, Lindeman NI (2016) the clinical implications of inconsistently methylated results from glioblastoma MGMT testing by replicate methylation-specific PCR. J Mol Diagn 18:864–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.06.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu CY, Ho HL, Lin SC, Chang-Chien YC, Chen MH, Hsu SP, Yen YS, Guo WY, Ho DM (2015) Prognosis of glioblastoma with faint MGMT methylation-specific PCR product. J Neurooncol 122:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1701-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Nifterik KA, van den Berg J, van der Meide WF, Ameziane N, Wedekind LE, Steenbergen RD, Leenstra S, Lafleur MV, Slotman BJ, Stalpers LJ, Sminia P (2010) Absence of the MGMT protein as well as methylation of the MGMT promoter predict the sensitivity for temozolomide. Br J Cancer 103:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605712

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sciuscio D, Diserens AC, van Dommelen K, Martinet D, Jones G, Janzer RC, Pollo C, Hamou MF, Kaina B, Stupp R, Levivier M, Hegi ME (2011) Extent and patterns of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma- and respective glioblastoma-derived spheres. Clin Cancer Res 17:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1931

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hegi ME, Stupp R (2015) Withholding temozolomide in glioblastoma patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter–still a dilemma? Neuro Oncol 17:1425–1427. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Ghent University Hospital, Centre for Oncology, from the “Stichting Luka Hemelaere” and “Fonds Arne Lannoy AKA Zorro.”

Author information

Author notes

  1. H. Pinson and G. Hallaert have contributed equally to this article.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    H. Pinson, G. Hallaert, D. Van Roost & J. P. Kalala

  2. Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

    J. Van der Meulen

  3. Department of Pathology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium

    F. Dedeurwaerdere

  4. Department of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium

    D. Vanhauwaert

  5. Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

    C. Van den Broecke & J. Van Dorpe

  6. Department of Pathology, AZ St. Lucas Gent, Ghent, Belgium

    C. Van den Broecke

  7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

    T. Boterberg

Authors
  1. H. Pinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Hallaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Van der Meulen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Dedeurwaerdere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Vanhauwaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Van den Broecke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Van Dorpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. D. Van Roost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. P. Kalala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. T. Boterberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Pinson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to be reported.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinson, H., Hallaert, G., Van der Meulen, J. et al. Weak MGMT gene promoter methylation confers a clinically significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Neurooncol 146, 55–62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03334-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03334-5

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma
  • MGMT gene methylation
  • qMSP
  • Prognosis