Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma lack worldwide consensus

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Glioblastoma predominantly occurs in the 6th and 7th decades of life. The optimal treatment paradigm for elderly patients is not well established. We sampled current worldwide management strategies for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Methods

A web-based survey was developed and distributed to 168 radiation oncologists, neuro-oncologists and neurosurgeons identified through the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties and the CNS committees for North American, European and Asian Organizations. Questions addressed treatment recommendations in order to determine whether management consensus exists in this patient subset.

Results

There were 68 (40%) respondents. Across respondents, the most important factors directing treatment were KPS (94%) and MGMT methylation status (71%). Only 37% of respondents strictly factor in age when making treatment recommendations with 59% defining elderly as greater than 70 years-old. The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-methylated elderly patients with KPS > 70 were as follows: standard chemoRT (49%), short course chemoRT (39%), and temozolomide alone (30%). The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-unmethylated patients with KPS > 70 were as follows: short course RT alone (51%), standard chemoRT (38%), and short course chemoRT (28%). Treatment recommendations for patients with KPS < 50 were short course RT alone (40%), best supportive care (57%), or TMZ alone (17%). Individuals practicing in North America were significantly more likely to recommend standard chemoradiation for patients compared to their European counterparts.

Conclusion

Worldwide treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM vary widely. Further randomized studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment strategy for this subset of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Xu J et al (2016) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2009–2013. Neuro Oncol 18(suppl_5):v1–v75. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now207

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwamoto FM, Reiner AS, Panageas KS, Elkin EB, Abrey LE (2008) Patterns of care in elderly glioblastoma patients. Ann Neurol 64(6):628–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C et al (2012) Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(7):707–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malmström A, Grønberg BH, Marosi C et al (2012) Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(9):916–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70265-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry JR, Laperriere N, O’Callaghan CJ et al (2017) Short-course radiation plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 376(11):1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guedes de Castro D, Matiello J, Roa W et al (2017) Survival outcomes with short-course radiation therapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma: data from a randomized phase 3 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98(4):931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sulman EP, Ismaila N, Armstrong TS et al (2016) Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement of the American society for radiation oncology guideline. J Clin Oncol 35(3):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lorimer CF, Saran F, Chalmers AJ, Brock J (2016) Glioblastoma in the elderly—how do we choose who to treat? J Geriatr Oncol 7(6):453–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sijben AE, McIntyre JB, Roldán GB et al (2008) Toxicity from chemoradiotherapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 89(1):97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9593-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilke C, Grosshans D, Duman J, Brown P, Li J (2017) Radiation-induced cognitive toxicity: pathophysiology and interventions to reduce toxicity in adults. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox195

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez-Tapia C, Paillaud E, Liuu E et al (2017) Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 83:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Franceschi E, Depenni R, Paccapelo A et al (2016) Which elderly newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients can benefit from radiotherapy and temozolomide? A PERNO prospective study. J Neurooncol 128(1):157–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2093-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Central Nervous System Cancers (Version I. 2017). August 2017. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cns.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua D. Palmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by our institutional IRB.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer, J.D., Bhamidipati, D., Mehta, M. et al. Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma lack worldwide consensus. J Neurooncol 140, 421–426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2969-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2969-3

Keywords

Navigation