Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The safety of magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for cerebral radiation necrosis

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a known complication of radiation therapy. Treatment options are limited and include steroids, bevacizumab, and surgery. This study seeks to determine the safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for CRN and identify the pattern of post-ablation volume change over time. Patients undergoing LITT for tumor treatment at Henry Ford Hospital between November 2013 and January 2016 with biopsy-confirmed CRN were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed with attention to ablation volume, survival, demographic data, steroid dose, and complications. Imaging occurred at set intervals beginning pre-ablation. Ten patients with 11 ablations were evaluated. Four patients had a primary diagnosis of high-grade glioma, while six had metastatic lesions. An average of 86% of CRN volume was ablated. Ablation volume increased to 430% of initial CRN volume at 1–2 weeks before decreasing to 69% after 6 months. No patient had a decline in baseline neurological examination while in the hospital. Four patients developed delayed neurological deficits likely due to post-operative edema, of which three improved back to baseline. The 6-month survival was 77.8% and the 1-year survival was 64.8% based on Kaplan–Meier curve estimates. In this study, LITT was a relatively safe treatment for CRN, providing both a diagnostic and therapeutic solution for refractory patients. Significant increase in ablation volume was noted at 1–2 months, gradually decreasing in size to less than the original volume by 6 months. Further studies are needed to better define the role of LITT in the treatment of CRN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chao ST, Ahluwalia MS, Barnett GH et al (2013) Challenges with the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral radiation necrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siu A, Wind JJ, Iorgulescu JB et al (2012) Radiation necrosis following treatment of high grade glioma—a review of the literature and current understanding. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1228-6; discussion 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahmathulla G, Recinos PF, Valerio JE et al (2012) Laser interstitial thermal therapy for focal cerebral radiation necrosis: a case report and literature review. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 90:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1159/000338251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Furuse M, Nonoguchi N, Kawabata S et al (2015) Delayed brain radiation necrosis: pathological review and new molecular targets for treatment. Med Mol Morphol 48:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-015-0123-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao MS, Hargreaves EL, Khan AJ et al (2014) Magnetic resonance-guided laser ablation improves local control for postradiosurgery recurrence and/or radiation necrosis. Neurosurgery 74:658–667. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000332; discussion 667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpentier A, McNichols RJ, Stafford RJ et al (2008) Real-time magnetic resonance-guided laser thermal therapy for focal metastatic brain tumors. Neurosurgery 63:ONS21–ONS2128. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000335007.07381.df; discussion ONS28-29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel P, Patel NV, Danish SF (2016) Intracranial MR-guided laser-induced thermal therapy: single-center experience with the Visualase thermal therapy system. J Neurosurg 125:853–860. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.JNS15244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpentier A, Chauvet D, Reina V et al (2012) MR-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) for recurrent glioblastomas. Lasers Surg Med 44:361–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sloan AE, Ahluwalia MS, Valerio-Pascua J et al (2013) Results of the NeuroBlate system first-in-humans Phase I clinical trial for recurrent glioblastoma: clinical article. J Neurosurg 118:1202–1219. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.1.JNS1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawasli AH, Bagade S, Shimony JS et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused laser interstitial thermal therapy for intracranial lesions: single-institution series. Neurosurgery 73:1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Burrows AM, Marsh WR, Worrell G et al (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for previously treated hypothalamic hamartomas. Neurosurg Focus 41:E8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.FOCUS16218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tovar-Spinoza Z, Choi H (2016) MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for the treatment of low-grade gliomas in children: a case-series review, description of the current technologies and perspectives. Childs Nerv Syst 32:1947–1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3193-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang JY, Wu C, Tracy J et al (2016) Laser interstitial thermal therapy for medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 57:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y-Q, Chen P, Haimovitz-Friedman A et al (2003) Endothelial apoptosis initiates acute blood-brain barrier disruption after ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 63:5950–5956

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murovic JA, Chang SD (2015) The pathophysiology of cerebral radiation necrosis and the role of laser interstitial thermal therapy. World Neurosurg 83:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A et al (2008) MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26:2192–2197. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai G, Mahadevan A, Hackney D et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of PET, SPECT, and arterial spin-labeling in differentiating tumor recurrence from necrosis in cerebral metastasis after stereotactic radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2250–2255. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith CJ, Myers CS, Chapple KM, Smith KA (2016) Long-term follow-up of 25 cases of biopsy-proven radiation necrosis or post-radiation treatment effect treated With magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy. Neurosurgery 79(Suppl 1):S59–S72. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beechar VB, Prabhu SS, Bastos D, Weinberg JS, Stafford RJ, Fuentes D, Hess KR, Rao G (2017) Volumetric response of progressing post-SRS lesions treated with laser interstitial thermal therapy. J Neurooncol 137:57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Harris Neurosciences Grant, #H1094.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ian Lee has consulting agreements with Monteris and Visualase.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rammo, R., Asmaro, K., Schultz, L. et al. The safety of magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 138, 609–617 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2828-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2828-2

Keywords

Navigation