Abstract
Patients with brain tumours face a number of medical and social challenges. Previous studies have shown that these patients and their relatives need a high level of patient-oriented information and counselling. However, these needs are often underestimated. In this single-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated, for the first time, the information needs of patients with brain tumours and their relatives depending on diagnosis, age and level of education. The participants were interviewed using pre-specified questionnaires. Answers were evaluated descriptively using standard statistical methods. A total of 888 questionnaires were sent out. The return rate was 50.7%. The majority of patients (nP = 103; 59.9%) and a higher proportion of relatives (nR = 103; 72.5%; p = 0.019) wished to receive a maximum of information. The majority (79.7% of patients; 83.1% of relatives) also stated that they preferred a personal, face-to-face meeting as primary source of information. The need for information increased with education (p = 0.015), and decreased with tumour grade (p = 0.025) and age (p = 0.118). Our data indicate that patients with brain tumours and their relatives have high information needs throughout their disease and continuously require information and counselling. Optimal provision of information is based on personal preferences, which needs to be evaluated appropriately. Patient-oriented information and counselling are parts of a successful communication strategy that can improve cancer care significantly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
RKI Cancer in Germany 2011/2112 (2015) In: Robert-Koch-Institute (ed). http://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/EN/Content/Publications/Cancer_in_Germany/cancer_chapters_2011_2012/cancer_germany_2011_2012.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
Manfredi C, Czaja R, Buis M, Derk D (1993) Patient use of treatment-related information received from the Cancer information service. Cancer 71:1326–1337
Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S (1995) No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psychooncology 4:197–202
Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis CR, Fallowfield L (1996) Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients’ views. BMJ 313:724–726
Dierks M-L, Schwartz F-W, Walter U (2000) Patienten als Kunden. Informationsbedarf und Qualität von Patienteninformationen aus Sicht der Public Health-Forschung. In: Jazbinsek D (ed) Gesundheitskommunikation. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 150–163
Harms F, Gänshirt D, Ahlert B (2009) Informationsbedürfnis von krebspatienten. Monit Versorg Forsch 04:32–36
Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW (2017) Prime time for shared decision making. JAMA 317:1309–1310
Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW (2016) The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA 315:2063–2064
Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 368:6–8
Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
Hoffmann TC, Montori VM, Del Mar C (2014) The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. JAMA 312:1295–1296
Brown R, Butow P, Wilson-Genderson M, Bernhard J, Ribi K, Juraskova I (2012) Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes. J Clin Oncol 30:857–862
Stacey D, Samant R, Bennett C (2008) Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J Clin 58:293–304
Vogel B, Helmes A, Bengel J (2006) Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation in der Tumorbehandlung: Erwartungen und Erfahrungen aus Patientensicht. Z Med Psychol 15:149–161
Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S, Brundage MD (2007) A purpose-based evaluation of information for patients: an approach to measuring effectiveness. Patient Educ Couns 65:311–319
Wiesing U, Tumorzentrum S (2008) Die Aufklärung von Tumorpatienten: Informationen und Empfehlungen für das betreuende Team. Südwestdt. Tumorzentrum
German F (2013) Ministry of Health Patientenrechte im Klartext. https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/P/Praevention/Infoblatt_Patientenrechte.pdf
Heimer A, Henkel M (2012) Bedarf an Krebsinformationen in der Bevölkerung. Analyse des Informationsverhaltens von Ratsuchenden Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft AKA, Heidelberg
Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns 57:250–261
Schumacher A, Volkenandt M, Koch OM (1998) Zur ärztlichen aufklärung von patienten mit bösartigen erkrankungen. Dtsch med Wochenschr 123:573–576
Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J (2001) Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 84:48–51
Vogel BA, Bengel J, Helmes AW (2008) Information and decision making: patients’ needs and experiences in the course of breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns 71:79–85
Schmidt A, Kowalski C, Wesselmann S, Pfaff H, Ernstmann N (2015) Informationsbedürfnisse und Informationsprozesse aus Sicht von Brustkrebspatientinnen im Krankheitsverlauf. Gesundheitswesen 77:A347
Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann of Intern Med 92:832–836
Eakin EG, Strycker LA (2001) Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. Psycho-oncology 10:103–113
Heimer A, Henkel M (2012) Bedarf an Krebsinformation in der Bevölkerung. Analyse des Informationsverhaltens von Ratsuchenden. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft AKA GmbH, Heidelberg
German F (2012) Ministry of Health: National cancer plan - action fields, goals and recommandations for implementation. https://www.tumorzentren.de/Nationaler Krebsplan.html
Gänshirt D, Harms F (2008) Direct patient information. Satus Quo 2008. Monitor Versorg Forsch 03:35–39
Zillmann B (2016) Kommunikation in der Krebstherapie. Deutschlandfunk Kultur Beitrag, http://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/kommunikation-in-der-krebstherapie-chemo-ohne-zuwendung.976.de.html?dram:article_id=348366
Cavers D, Hacking B, Erridge SC, Morris PG, Kendall M, Murray SA (2013) Adjustment and support needs of glioma patients and their relatives: serial interviews. Psycho-oncology 22:1299–1305
Schönberger C, Kardoff E (2002) Angehörige Krebskranker in der Rehabilitation. In: Rehabilitationswissenschaften, If (eds). Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger, Berlin
Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, Chie WC, Bergenmar M, Costantini A, Young T, Vlasic KK, Velikova G (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738
Bredart A, Beaudeau A, Young T, Moura De Alberquerque Melo H, Arraras JI, Friend L, Schmidt H, Tomaszewski KA, Bergenmar M, Anota A, Costantini A, Marchal F, Tomaszewska IM, Vassiliou V, Chie WC, Hureaux J, Conroy T, Ramage J, Bonnetain F, Kulis D, Aaronson NK (2017) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer - satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire: revision and extended application development. Psycho-oncology 26:400–404
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to all patients and their relatives who participated in the survey. The study was funded in part by Grant of the Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung, Munich, Germany 2009.800.1 und 2009.800.2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Research involving human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11060_2018_2811_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Online Resource 1: CONSORT diagram. Of the patients treated who were questioned (n = 444) and their relatives (n = 444), replies were received from 450 persons (50.7%). 35.4% (n = 314) agreed to participate in the study. (DOCX 200 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Online Resource 2: Use of information channels Both patients and relatives usually received their information from the treating doctors. The internet also served as an important source of information (DOCX 96 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Online Resource 3: Information topics. The focus in the search for information by both patients and relatives was on the medical treatments, especially surgery and radiotherapy and the medical tests necessary for diagnosis. (DOCX 96 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM4_ESM.docx
Online Resource 4a: Information approach in patients depending on age. The general need for information and the wish to participate in treatment decisions in patients decline with age. Older patients tend to rely on the doctors’ decisions. There are no significant differences between the age-groups. (DOCX 97 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM5_ESM.docx
Online Resource 4b: Information approach in patients depending on diagnosis. The general desire for information decreases significantly (p = 0.025) with increasing malignancy of the diagnosis. On the other hand, the preference for relying on the doctor’s decisions increases significantly (p = 0.016). (DOCX 97 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM6_ESM.docx
Online Resource 4c: Information approach in patients depending education. The general desire to participate in treatment decisions increases with the level of education (p = 0.312). (DOCX 97 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM7_ESM.docx
Online Resource 5a: Information requirements in patients depending on age. There are no significant differences. However, legal issues such as disability and reintegration at work are of interest chiefly to the under-fifties. (DOCX 124 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM8_ESM.docx
Online Resource 5b: Information requirements in patients depending on diagnosis. With increasing malignancy of the diagnosis, patient´s information requirements with respect to medical treatment are high. (DOCX 123 KB)
11060_2018_2811_MOESM9_ESM.docx
Online Resource 5c: Information requirements in patients depending on education. Patients with a high level of education obtain information on all topic areas on their own initiative. Despite this high level of information, they have the highest information requirements, especially on issues like vocational reintegration, disability, and advance directives. (DOCX 136 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reinert, C., Rathberger, K., Klinkhammer-Schalke, M. et al. Information needs and requirements in patients with brain tumours and their relatives. J Neurooncol 138, 407–415 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2811-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2811-y