Skip to main content
Log in

Rechallenge with bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma progressing off therapy

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rechallenge with temozolomide has been shown to be a valid option in selected patients with progressive glioblastoma. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of rechallenge with bevacizumab in glioblastoma patients progressing off therapy. We retrospectively identified and analyzed the characteristics of patients with glioblastoma rechallenged with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen after having received bevacizumab as first-line treatment in association with temozolomide radiochemotherapy or at recurrence in association with temozolomide, CCNU or irinotecan. Twenty-five patients were identified. In all included patients, the first bevacizumab treatment resulted in an objective response and was discontinued for reasons other than disease progression (adverse event n = 9, physician or patient decision n = 16). Median duration of first bevacizumab treatment was 6 months (range: 2–58 months). None of the patients presented a rebound effect after bevacizumab discontinuation. The median interval between discontinuation of first bevacizumab treatment and bevacizumab rechallenge was 8.9 months (range: 2–58 months). At this time, bevacizumab was given in association with lomustine (n = 17), temozolomide (n = 6), irinotecan (n = 1), or alone (n = 1). Bevacizumab rechallenge resulted in an objective response in 15 patients (60%). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 9.6 months after bevacizumab rechallenge. Timing of first bevacizumab treatment (as first-line treatment or at recurrence) was not associated with the duration of response after treatment rechallenge. In the present series, patients who responded to bevacizumab and in whom this treatment was discontinued in the absence of tumor progression seemed to benefit from rechallenge with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weller M, van den Bent M, Tonn JC et al (2017) European association for neuro-oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. Lancet Oncol 18(6):e315–e329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kästner B et al (2015) MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res 21(9):2057–2064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyronet D, Esteban-Mader M, Bonnet C et al (2017) Characteristics of H3 K27M-mutant gliomas in adults. Neuro Oncol 9(8):1127–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Chang SM (2009) End point assessment in gliomas: novel treatments limit usefulness of classical Macdonald’s Criteria. J Clin Oncol 20(18):2905–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W et al (2014) Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(8):709–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS et al (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(8):699–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M et al (2017) Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 377(20):1954–1963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chinot OL, Nishikawa R, Mason W et al (2016) Upfront bevacizumab may extend survival for glioblastoma patients who do not receive second-line therapy: an exploratory analysis of AVAglio. Neuro Oncol 18(9):1313–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tabouret E, Boudouresque F, Farina P et al (2015) MMP2 and MMP9 as candidate biomarkers to monitor bevacizumab therapy in high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol 17(8):1174–1176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandmann T, Bourgon R, Garcia J et al (2015) Patients with proneural glioblastoma may derive overall survival benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line radiotherapy and temozolomide: retrospective analysis of the AVAglio Trial. J Clin Oncol 1(25):2735–2744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erdem-Eraslan L, Van den Bent MJ, Hoogstrate Y (2016) Identification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who may benefit from combined bevacizumab and CCNU therapy: a report from the BELOB Trial. Cancer Res 76(3):525–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dehais C, Souvannavong V, Nguyen BK (2011) An evaluation of fatigue in patients with glioblastoma relapse treated with the combination of irinotecan-bevacizumab. Rev Neurol (Paris) 167(11):841–846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuniga RM, Torcuator R, Jain R et al (2010) Rebound tumour progression after the cessation of bevacizumab therapy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neurooncol 99(2):237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hertenstein A, Hielscher T, Menn O et al (2016) Impact of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 129(3):533–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cha Y, Kim YJ, Lee SH et al (2017) Post-bevacizumab clinical outcomes and the impact of early discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Cancer Res Treat 49(1):129–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson MD, Hamza MA, Hess KR, Puduvalli VK (2014) Implications of bevacizumab discontinuation in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 16(6):823–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Reardon DA, Galanis E, DeGroot JF (2011) Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape. Neuro Oncol 13(3):353–361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schreuer M, Jansen Y, Planken S et al (2017) Combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF and MEK inhibitor pretreated patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open-label, single arm, dual-centre, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 18(4):464–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cappuzzo F, Morabito A, Normanno N et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of rechallenge treatment with gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 99:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oudard S, Geoffrois L, Guillot A et al (2016) Clinical activity of sunitinib rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma-Results of the REchallenge with SUnitinib in MEtastatic RCC (RESUME) Study. Eur J Cancer 62:28–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuczynski E, Sargent D, Grothey A, Kerbel R (2013) Drug rechallenge and treatment beyond progression-implications for drug resistance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10(10):571–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Perry JR, Bélanger K, Mason WP et al (2010) Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol 28(12):2051–2057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reardon DA, Herndon JE, Peters KB et al (2012) Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients. Br J Cancer 107(9):1481–1487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(5):740–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rahman R, Hempfling K, Norden AD et al (2014) Retrospective study of carmustine or lomustine with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients who have failed prior bevacizumab. Neuro Oncol 16(11):1523–1529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Ducray.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bronnimann, C., Izquierdo, C., Cartalat, S. et al. Rechallenge with bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma progressing off therapy. J Neurooncol 138, 141–145 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2780-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2780-1

Keywords

Navigation