Advertisement

Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 83–97 | Cite as

Pediatric neuro-oncology survival disparities in California

  • Tabitha Cooney
  • Paul G. Fisher
  • Li Tao
  • Christina A. Clarke
  • Sonia Partap
Clinical Study

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate racial/ethnic differences in survival for pediatric high-grade glioma (HGG) and medulloblastoma in the state of California. We obtained data from the California Cancer Registry on 552 high-grade glioma patients (110 brainstem, 442 non-brainstem) and 648 medulloblastoma patients ages 0–19 years from 1988 to 2012. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, we examined the impact of individual and neighborhood characteristics on survival. Socioeconomic quintile and insurance status differed significantly by race for both diagnoses. Hispanic children with non-brainstem HGG had worse survival than non-Hispanic white children: hazard ratio (HR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–2.11, but the difference was mitigated some by accounting for socioeconomic status (HR 1.48, CI 1.10–1.99). Racial/ethnic differences in survival exist for children with high-grade glioma, particularly Hispanic children with non-brainstem high-grade glioma, and are likely related to sociologic factors.

Keywords

Pediatric Survival Disparity High-grade glioma Medulloblastoma 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. Cooney’s work was supported by the Children’s Health Research Institute. Dr. Tao and Dr. Clarke’s work was supported by the Stanford Cancer Institute and the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program under Contract HHSN261201000140C.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Cooney declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Fisher declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Tao declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Clarke reports employment by GRAIL, Inc, outside the submitted work. Dr. Partap declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Booth CM, Li G, Zhang-Salomons J et al (2010) The impact of socioeconomic status on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survival: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Cancer 116(17):4160–4167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gage E (2010) Examining the most relevant conceptualization of the socioeconomic status construct for cancer research. Cancer Nurs 33(3):E1–E9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linabery AM, Ross JA (2008) Childhood and adolescent cancer survival in the US by race and ethnicity for the diagnostic period 1975–1999. Cancer 113(9):2575–2596CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linabery AM, Ross JA (2008) Trends in childhood cancer incidence in the U.S. (1992–2004). Cancer 112:416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Severson RK, Stanton B et al (2005) Pediatric brain tumors in Non-Hispanics, Hispanics, African Americans and Asians: differences in survival after diagnosis. Cancer Causes Control 16(5):587–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samaan MC, Akhtar-Danesh N (2015) The impact of age and race on longevity in pediatric astrocytic tumors: a population-based study. Pediatric Blood Cancer 62(9):1567–1571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lam S, Lin Y, Melkonian S (2012) Analysis of risk factors and survival in pediatric high-grade spinal cord astrocytoma: a population-based study. Pediatr Neurosurg 48(5):299–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam S, Lin Y, Auffinger B et al (2015) Analysis of survival in pediatric high-grade brainstem gliomas: a population-based study. J Pediatr Neurosci 10(3):199–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schupp CW, Press DJ, Gomez SL (2014) Immigration factors and prostate cancer survival among Hispanic men in California: does neighborhood matter? Cancer 120(9):1401–1408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel MI, Schupp CW, Gomez SL et al (2013) How do social factors explain outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer among Hispanics in California? Explaining the Hispanic paradox. J Clin Oncol 1 31(28):3572–3578CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gomez N, Guendelman S, Harley KG et al (2015) Nativity and neighborhood characteristics and cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival outcomes among Hispanic women in California. Am J Public Health 105(3):538–545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Epstein D, Reibel M, Unger JB et al (2014) The effect of neighborhood and individual characteristics on pediatric critical illness. J Community Health 39(4):753–759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R et al (2001) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control 12:703–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang ET, Yang J, Alfaro-Velcamp T et al (2010) Disparities in liver cancer incidence by nativity, acculturation, and socioeconomic status in California Hispanics and Asians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:3106–3118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keegan TH, John EM, Fish KM et al (2010) Breast cancer incidence patterns among California Hispanic women: differences by nativity and residence in an enclave. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1208–1218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gomez SL, Clarke CA, Shema SJ et al (2010) Disparities in breast cancer survival among Asian women by ethnicity and immigrant status: a population-based study. Am J Public Health 100:861–869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gomez SL, Glaser SL, McClure LA et al (2011) The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations. Cancer Causes Control 22:631–647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patel MI, Schupp CW, Gomez SL et al (2013) How do social factors explain outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer among Hispanics in California? Explaining the Hispanic paradox. JCO 21:3572–3578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith EC, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H (2012) Association between insurance and socioeconomic status and risk of advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma in adolescents and young adults. Cancer 118(24):6179–6187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tao L, Foran JM, Clarke CA et al (2014) Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the modern treatment era. Blood 123(23):3553–3562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McLendon RE, Robinson JS, Chambers DB et al (1985) The glioblastoma multiforme in Georgia, 1977–1981. Cancer 56(4):894–897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simpson JR, Scott CB, Rotman M et al (1996) Race and prognosis of brain tumor patients entering multicenter clinical trials. A report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 19(2):114–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barnholtz-Sloan JB, Maldonado JL, Williams VL et al (2007) Racial/ethnic differences in survival among elderly patients with a primary glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 85(2):171–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF et al (2003) Area socioeconomic variations in US cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975–1999. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, No. 4. NIH Publication No. pp 03–5417Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chu KC, Miller BA, Springfield SA (2007) Measures of racial/ethnic health disparities in cancer mortality rates and the influence of socioeconomic status. J Natl Med Assoc 99(10):1092–1100PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang M, Burau KD, Fang S et al (2008) Ethnic Variations in Diagnosis, Treatment, socioeconomic status, and survival in a large population-based cohort of elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 113:3231–3241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Truong B, Green AL, Friedrich P et al (2015) Ethnic, racial and socioeconomic disparities in retinoblastoma. JAMA Pediatr 169(12):1096–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Viana SS, de Lima LM, do Nascimento JB et al (2015) Secular trends and predictors of mortality in acute lymphoblastic leukemia for children of low socioeconomic level in Northeast Brazil. Leuk Res 39(10):1060–1065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abrahão R, Lichtensztajn DY, Ribeiro RC et al (2015) Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in survival among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in California, 1988–2011: a population-based observational study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62(10):1819–1825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Keegan TH, Grogan RH, Parsons HM et al (2015) Sociodemographic disparities in differentiated thyroid cancer survival among adolescents and young adults in California. Thyroid 25(6):635–648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simony SB, Lund LW, Erdmann F et al (2016) Effect of socioeconomic position on survival after childhood cancer in Denmark. Acta Oncol 55(6):742–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reyes-Ortiz CA, Eschbach K, Zhang DD et al (2008) Neighborhood composition and cancer among Hispanics: tumor stage and size at time of diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(11):2931–2936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A et al (2007) Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1384–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arnautovic A, Billups C, Broniscer A et al (2015) Delayed diagnosis of childhood low-grade glioma: causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Child’s Nervous System 31(7):1067–1077CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kukal K, Dobrovoljac M, Boltshauser E et al (2009) Does diagnostic delay result in decreased survival in paediatric brain tumours?. Eur J Pediatr 168(3):303–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bleyer WA et al (1997) National cancer clinical trials: children have equal access, adolescents do not. J Adolesc Health 21(6):366–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bleyer WA, Tejeda HA, Murphy SB et al (1997) Equal participation of minority patients in U.S. national pediatric cancer clinical trials. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 19:423–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lund MJ, Eliason MT, Haight AE et al (2009) Racial/ethnic diversity in children’s oncology clinical trials: ten years later. Cancer 115(16):3808–3816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aristizabal P, Singer J, Cooper R et al (2015) Participation in pediatric oncology research protocols: racial/ethnic, language and age-based disparities. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62(8):1337–1344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nooka AK, Behera M et al (2016) Access to Children’s Oncology Group and Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium phase 1 clinical trials: racial/ethnic dissimilarities in participation. Cancer 122(20):3207–3214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jones C, Karajannis MA, Jones DTW et al (2017) Pediatric high-grade glioma: biologically and clinically in need of new thinking. Neuro-oncology 19(2):153–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mackay A, Carvalho D, Izquierdo E et al (2017) Integrated molecular meta-analysis of 1000 pediatric high-grade and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Cancer Cell 9(4):520–537 32(CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taylor MD, Northcott PA, Korshunov A et al (2012) Molecular subgroups of medulloblstoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 123(4):465–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ramaswamy V, Remke M, Bouffet E et al (2016) Risk stratification of childhood medulloblastoma in the molecular era: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 131(6):821–831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schwalbe EC, Lindsey JC, Nakjang S et al (2017) Novel molecular subgroups for clinical classification and outcome prediction in childhood medulloblastoma: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 18(7):958–971CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Child Neurology, Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at StanfordPalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Cancer Prevention Institute of CaliforniaFremontUSA
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations