Skip to main content

Clinical and dosimetric study of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Abstract

Background and purpose

We aimed to compare three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study of 220 patients with glioblastoma, treated with 3D-CRT or IMRT, with or without surgery. Dosimetric parameters as well as clinical and survival data for the two techniques were analyzed and compared.

Results

The median conformity index was 1.53 (range 0–2.69) for 3D-CRT and 1.25 (range 0.97–2.01) for IMRT, p < 10−4. The median homogeneity index was 0.10 (range 0.03–0.32) for 3D-CRT and 0.07 (range 0.03–0.18) for IMRT, p < 10−4. There were significantly fewer acute grade 1 and 2 neurological toxicities in the IMRT group especially for edema (1.3 versus 12.4%, p = 0.017), concentration disorders (6.6 versus 19.9%, p = 0.003) and consciousness disorders (2.6 versus 13.2%, p = 0.002) although IMRT patients had a significantly worse pre-treatment neurological status than 3D-CRT patients. Median survival was 16.0 months (range 11.9–17.8) for IMRT and 13.4 months (range 11.7–15.7) for 3D-CRT patients (p = 0.542).

Conclusion

IMRT improved target conformity and reduced neurological toxicities for patients with glioblastomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJB et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Truc G, Bernier V, Mirjolet C, Dalban C, Mazoyer F, Bonnetain F et al (2016) A phase I dose escalation study using simultaneous integrated-boost IMRT with temozolomide in patients with unifocal glioblastoma. Cancer Radiother 20(3):193–198

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y-D, Feng J, Fang T, Yang M, Qiu X-G, Jiang T (2013) Effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy on clinical outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Chin Med J (Engl) 126(12):2320–2324

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amelio D, Lorentini S, Schwarz M, Amichetti M (2010) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review on clinical and technical issues. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 97(3):361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan MF, Schupak K, Burman C, Chui C-S, Ling CC (2003) Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy planning for glioblastoma multiforme. Med Dosim Off J Am Assoc Med Dosim 28(4):261–265

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cao Y, Tseng C-L, Balter JM, Teng F, Parmar H, Sahgal A et al (2017) MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system. Neuro Oncol 19(2):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanas V, Zacharaki E, Thomas G, Zinn PColen R et al (2017) Learning MRI-based classification models for MGMT methylation status prediction in glioblastoma. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 140(2):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghose A, Lim G, Husain S (2010) Treatment for glioblastoma multiforme: current guidelines and Canadian practice. Curr Oncol Tor Ont 17(6):52–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feuvret L, Noël G, Mazeron J-J, Bey P (2006) Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(2):333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermanto U, Frija EK, Lii MJ, Chang EL, Mahajan A, Woo SY (2007) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas: does IMRT increase the integral dose to normal brain? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(4):1135–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piroth MD, Pinkawa M, Holy R, Stoffels G, Demirel C, Attieh C et al (2009) Integrated-boost IMRT or 3-D-CRT using FET-PET based auto-contoured target volume delineation for glioblastoma multiforme–a dosimetric comparison. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl 4:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buglione M, Spiazzi L, Saiani F, Costa L, Shehi B, Lazzari B et al (2014) Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, static intensity-modulated and helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in glioblastoma. Dosimetric comparison in patients with overlap between target volumes and organs at risk. Tumori 100(3):272–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Briere TM, McAleer MF, Levy LB, Yang JN et al (2017) Sparing of normal tissues with volumetric arc radiation therapy for glioblastoma: single institution clinical experience. Radiat Oncol 12(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mac Donald SM, Ahmad S, Kachris S, Vlachali MT et al (2007) Intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for the treatment of high grade glioma: a dosimetric comparison. J Appl Clin Med Phys 8(2):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuller CD, Choi M, Forthuber B, Wang SJ, Rajagiriyil N, Salter BJ et al (2007) Standard fractionation intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of primary and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Radiat Oncol 2(1):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Narayana A, Yamada J, Berry S, Shah P, Hunt M, Gutin PH et al (2006) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in high-grade gliomas: clinical and dosimetric results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(3):892–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morganti AG, Balducci M, Salvati M, Esposito V, Romanelli P, Ferro M et al (2010) A phase I dose-escalation study (ISIDE-BT-1) of accelerated IMRT with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):92–97

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iuchi T, Hatano K, Narita Y, Kodama T, Yamaki T, Osato K (2006) Hypofractionated high-dose irradiation for the treatment of malignant astrocytomas using simultaneous integrated boost technique by IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(5):1317–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Philip Bastable for his review and corrections of the wording in this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilles Truc.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thibouw, D., Truc, G., Bertaut, A. et al. Clinical and dosimetric study of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy. J Neurooncol 137, 429–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2735-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2735-y

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma
  • Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
  • 3D conformational radiation therapy
  • Dosimetric outcomes
  • Clinical outcomes