Skip to main content

Impact of treatment on survival of patients with secondary glioblastoma

Abstract

Data concerning treatment of secondary glioblastoma evolving from previously treated WHO II or III grade tumors are very scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical resection and adjuvant treatment on survival in patients with secondary glioblastoma. Thirty-nine patients with secondary glioblastoma evolving from previously treated lower grade gliomas between 2004 and 2015 were included. We evaluated the extent of resection, pathological parameters, adjuvant treatment, as well as survival after malignant transformation. The primary tumor grade was WHO II in 16 (41.0%) and WHO III in 23 (59.0%) patients. Median age was 43 years (range 23–67). Median KPS was 80 (range 60–100) before surgery, and 70 (range 50–100) after surgery. Gross total resection (GTR) of contrast-enhancing disease was achieved in 19 (48.7%) patients. Adjuvant treatment was radio-chemotherapy in 23 (59.0%), radiotherapy in three (7.7%), chemotherapy in five (12.8%) and none in eight (20.5%) patients. Median survival was 11 months (range 1–35) in the entire group. Time since initial diagnosis and previous treatment did not correlate with survival after glioblastoma. Failed GTR, poor KPS after surgery, and no adjuvant treatment were prognostic factors for shorter survival in univariate analysis (p < 0.0001, p = 0.028 and p = 0.003). In selected patients, complete resection and adjuvant treatment may prolong survival in spite of multiple previous therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2013) The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 19:764–772. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nobusawa S, Watanabe T, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2009) IDH1 mutations as molecular signature and predictive factor of secondary glioblastomas. Clin Cancer Res 15:6002–6007. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0715

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Juratli TA, Kirsch M, Geiger K et al (2012) The prognostic value of IDH mutations and MGMT promoter status in secondary high-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 110:325–333. doi:10.1007/s11060-012-0977-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack BM, Miller DC, Budzilovich GN et al (1992) Treatment and survival of low-grade astrocytoma in adults–1977–1988. Neurosurgery 31:636–642 (discussion 642)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramakrishna R, Hebb A, Barber J et al (2015) Outcomes in Reoperated Low-Grade Gliomas. Neurosurgery 77:175–184. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2005) Population-based studies on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations in astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64:479–489

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delgado-López PD, Corrales-García EM (2016) Survival in glioblastoma: a review on the impact of treatment modalities. Clin Transl Oncol 18:1062–1071. doi:10.1007/s12094-016-1497-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson BE, Mazor T, Hong C et al (2014) Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science 343:189–193. doi:10.1126/science.1239947

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jakola AS, Gulati S, Weber C et al (2011) Postoperative deterioration in health related quality of life as predictor for survival in patients with glioblastoma: A prospective study. PLoS ONE 6:e28592. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028592

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Quick J, Gessler F, Dützmann S et al (2014) Benefit of tumor resection for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 117:365–372. doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1397-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Nothing to declare.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan J. Grau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamisch, C., Ruge, M., Kellermann, S. et al. Impact of treatment on survival of patients with secondary glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 133, 309–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2415-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2415-y

Keywords

  • Secondary glioblastoma
  • Low grade glioma
  • Resection
  • Recurrence