Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of the Mishel’s uncertainty in illness scale-brain tumor form (MUIS-BT)

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Mishel uncertainty in illness scale (MUIS) has been used extensively with other solid tumors throughout the continuum of illness. Interventions to manage uncertainty have been shown to improve mood and symptoms. Patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) face uncertainty related to diagnosis, prognosis, symptoms and response. Modifying the MUIS to depict uncertainty in PBT patients will help define this issue and allow for interventions to improve quality of life. Initially, 15 experts reviewed the content validity of the MUIS-brain tumor form (MUIS-BT). Patients diagnosed with PBT then participated in the study to test validity and reliability. Data was collected at one point in time. Six out of 33 items in the original MUIS were modified to better describe PBT patients’ uncertainty. 32 of the 186 patients in the second-stage of the study were newly diagnosed with PBT, 85 were on treatment, and 69 were followed-up without active treatment. The validity of the MUIS-BT was demonstrated by its correlations with mood states (P < 0.01) and symptom severity (P < 0.01) and interference (P < 0.01). The MUIS-BT measures four constructs: ambiguity/inconsistency, unpredictability of disease prognosis, unpredictability of symptoms and other triggers, and complexity. Cronbach’s alphas of the four subscales were 0.90, 0.77, 0.75 and 0.65, respectively. The 33-item MUIS-BT demonstrated adequate select measures of validity and reliability in PBT patients. Based on this initial validation and significant correlations with symptom distress and mood states, further understanding of uncertainty and evaluation of measures to help manage patients’ uncertainty can be evaluated which in turn may improve coping and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Preusser M, de Ribaupierre S, Wöhrer A, Erridge SC, Hegi M, Weller M, Stupp R (2011) Current concepts and management of glioblastoma. Ann Neurol 70:9–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gilbert MR, Chakravarti A (2007) Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25:4127–4136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mishel MH (1988) Uncertainty in illness. Image J Nurs Sch 20:225–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJB, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross G, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJB, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomized phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Calbucci F, Franceschi E (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol 10:361–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9:453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordova MJ, Andrykowsky MA, Kenady DE, McGrath PC, Sloan DA, Redd WH (1995) Frequency and correlations of posttraumatic-stress-disorder-like-symptoms after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:981–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Osoba D, Aaronson N, Zee B, Sprangers M, te Velde A (1997) Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 6:103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian BS, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J (1993) The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Gelke CK, Byrne KS, Cella DF, Levin VA (1995) The functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) scale: development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer 75:1151–1161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mishel MH (1981) The measurement of uncertainty in illness. Nurs Res 30:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mishel MH (1990) Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Image J Nurs Sch 22:256–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mishel MH (1999) Uncertainty in chronic illness. Annu Rev Nurs Res 17:269–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Polit DF, Beck C (2006) Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal and utilization, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mishel MH (1984) Perceived uncertainty and stress in illness. Res Nurs Health 7:163–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mishel MH, Braden CJ (1987) Uncertainty: a mediator between support and adjustment. West J Nurs Res 9:43–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Armstrong TS, Mendoza T, Gning I, Coco C, Cohen MZ, Eriksen L, Hsu M, Gilbert MR, Cleeland C (2006) Validation of the M.D. Anderson symptom inventory brain tumor module (MDASI-BT). J Neurooncol 80:27–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1971) EITS manual for the profile of mood states. Educational & Industrial Testing Service, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shacham S (1983) A shortened version of the profile of mood states. J Pers Assess 47:305–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, Polland A, Dudley WN (2002) A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology 11:273–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soeken KL (2010) Validity of measures. In: Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER (eds) Measurement in nursing and health research, 4th edn. Springer, New York, pp 163–201

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lin L, Acquaye AA, Vera-Bolanos E, Cahill J, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS (2011) QL-13: reliability and validity of the MUIS-brain tumor form (MUIS-BT). Neuro Oncol 13(suppl 3):124

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mishel MH (1983) Parents’ perception of uncertainty concerning their hospitalized child. Nurs Res 32:324–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Armstrong TS, Vera-Bolanos E, Gning I, Acquaye A, Gilbert MR, Cleeland C, Mendoza T (2011) The impact of symptom interference using the MD Anderson symptom inventory brain tumor module (MDASI-BT) on prediction of recurrence in primary brain tumor patients. Cancer 117:3222–3228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Acquaye AA, Lin L, Aspenson AC, Cahill J, Vera-Bolanos E, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS (2011) QL-11: mood disturbance in patients with brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 13(suppl 3):123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the Elizabeth W. Quinn Oncology Research Award from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Nursing. The authors would like to thank the research subjects for their participation. The authors would also like to thank the clinical experts and Dr. Mishel for evaluating the content validity of MUIS-BT.

Funding

This study is supported by the Elizabeth W. Quinn Oncology Research Award from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Nursing.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, L., Acquaye, A.A., Vera-Bolanos, E. et al. Validation of the Mishel’s uncertainty in illness scale-brain tumor form (MUIS-BT). J Neurooncol 110, 293–300 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0971-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0971-8

Keywords

Navigation