Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase II trial of thalidomide and procarbazine in adult patients with recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas

  • Clinical Study – Patient Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thalidomide and procarbazine have demonstrated single agent activity against malignant gliomas (MG). We evaluated the combination of thalidomide and procarbazine with a single arm phase II trial in adults with recurrent or progressive MG. Procarbazine was given at a dose of 250 mg/m2/d × 5day q 28 days. Thalidomide was administered at a dose of 200 mg/day continuously. Intrapatient dose escalation of thalidomide was attempted (increase by 100 mg/day weekly as tolerated) to a maximum of 800 mg/day. The primary outcome was tumor response, assessed by MRI and CT. Secondary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. In addition, quality of life questionnaires were performed at baseline and prior to each odd cycle in all treated patients. Eighteen patients (median age of 50) were accrued and received a total of 36 cycles (median 2) of therapy. The median maximum thalidomide dose achieved was 400 mg (range 0–800). No complete or partial responses were seen. One patient (6%) experienced stable disease, fourteen (78%) progressed as best response and three (17%) were not evaluable for response. Median time to progression was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.5–2.5). Seventeen patients have died (one patient lost to follow-up after progression); median survival from enrollment was 7.6 months (95% CI, 3.5–9.4). Grade 3/4 drug related toxicity was minimal. Quality of life diminished over time. The combination of thalidomide and procarbazine demonstrated no efficacy in this trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wen PY, Kesari S (2008) Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med 359:492–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Central brain tumor registry of the United States (2004–2006) Statistical report: primary brain tumors in the United States

  3. Wu W, Lamborn KR, Buckner JC et al (2010) Joint NCCTG and NABTC prognostic factors analysis for high-grade recurrent glioma. Neuro Oncol 12:164–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fine HA, Dear KBG, Loeffler JS et al (1993) Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 71:2585–2597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart LA (2002) Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials. Lancet 359(9311):1011–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiothearpy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozololmide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:740–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4733–4740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perry JR, Bélanger K, Mason WP et al (2010) Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol 28(12):2051–2057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Singhal S, Mehta J, Eddlemon P et al (1998) Marked anti-tumor effect from anti-angiogenesis therapy with Thalidomide in high risk refractory multiple myeloma (Abst). Blood 92(Suppl 1: (part 1 of 2)):318a

    Google Scholar 

  12. Figg WD, Bergan R, Brawley O et al (1997) Randomized phase II study of thalidomide in androgen independent prostate cancer (Abst). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16:333a

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fine HA, Figg WD, Jaeckle K et al (2000) Phase II trial of antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 18:708–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Politi P, Reboredo G, Losso M et al (1998) Phase I trial of thalidomide in AIDS-related Kaposi Sarcoma (Abst). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:41a

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glass J, Gruber ML, Nirenberg A (1999) Phase I/II study of carboplatin and thalidomide in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (Abst). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:144a

    Google Scholar 

  16. Durie BGM, Stepan DE (1999) Efficacy of low dose thalidomide in multiple myeloma. VII international multiple myeloma workshop, Stockholm

  17. Fine HA, Maher EA, Wen PY et al (2003) Phase II trial of thalidomide and carmustine for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 21(12):2305–2311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chabner BA, Sponzi R, Hubbard S et al (1973) High-dose intermittent intravenous infusion of procarbazine. Cancer Chemother Rep 57:361–363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Coyle T, Bushunow P, Winfield J et al (1992) Hypersensitivity reactions to procarbazine with mechlorethamine, vincristine, and procarbazine chemotherapy in the treatment of glioma. Cancer 69:2523–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann DF, Hurteau TE, Newman N et al (1997) Anticonvulsant usage is associated with an increased risk of procarbazine hypersensitivity reactions in patients with brain tumors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 62:225–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Newton HB, Bromberg J, Junck L et al (1986) Comparison between BCNU and procarbazine chemotherapy for treatment of gliomas. J Neurooncol 15:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodriguez LA, Prados M, Silver P et al (1989) Reevaluation of procarbazine for the treatment of recurrent malignant central nervous system tumors. Cancer 64:2420–2423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Newton HB, Junck L, Bronberg J et al (1990) Procarbazine chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent malignant astrocytomas after radiation and nitrosourea failure. Neurology 40:1743–1746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brandes AA, Ermani M, Turazzi S et al (1999) Procarbazine and high-dose tamoxifen as a second-line regimen in recurrent high-grade gliomas: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 17:645–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gundersen S, Lote K, Watne K (1998) A retrospective study of the value of chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy to surgery and radiotherapy in grade 3 and 4 gliomas. Eur J Cancer 34:1565–1569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yung A, Albright R, Olson J et al (2000) A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer 83(5):588–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grossman S, Carson KA, Batchelor TT et al (2006) The effect of enzyme inducing anti-seizure drugs on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of procarbazine hydrochloride. Clin Cancer Res 12:5174–5181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Macdonald D, Cascino T, Schold SJ et al (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marx GM, Pavlakis N, McCowatt S et al (2001) Phase II study of thalidomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 54(1):31–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaw EG, Wang M, Coons S et al (2008) Final report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 9802: radiation therapy (RT) versus RT + procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for adult low-grade glioma (LGG). J Clin Oncol 26 (May 20 suppl; abstr 2006)

  32. Baumann F, Kollias SS et al (2004) Combined thalidomide and temozolomide treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 67(1–2):191–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Groves MD, Puduvalli VK, Chang SM et al (2007) A North American brain tumor consortium (NABTC 99-04) phase II trial of temozolomide plus thalidomide for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 81(3):271–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Puduvalli VK, Giglio P, Groves MD et al (2008) Phase II trial of irinotecan and thalidomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 10(2):216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fadul CE, Kingman LS, Meyer LP et al (2008) A phase II study of thalidomide and irinotecan for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 90(2):229–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang SM, Lamborn KR, Malec M et al (2004) Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide with radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(2):353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fine HA, Kim L, Albert PS et al (2007) A phase I trial of lenalidomide in patients with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. Clin Cancer Res 13(23):7101–7106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grant 3 U10 CA81851-08-12.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest for all authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn J. Lesser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz, J., Case, D., Enevold, G. et al. A phase II trial of thalidomide and procarbazine in adult patients with recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 106, 611–617 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0698-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0698-y

Keywords

Navigation