Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Longitudinal assessment of childhood optic gliomas: relationship between flicker visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging findings

  • clinical-patient studies
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate longitudinally functional and neuro-radiologic findings in childhood optic gliomas (OG), by comparing flicker visual evoked potentials (F-VEPs) with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes. Fourteen children (age range: 1–13 years) with OGs underwent serial F-VEP, MRI and neuro-ophthalmic examinations over a 38 month (median, range: 6–76) follow-up. F-VEPs were elicited by 8 Hz sine-wave flicker stimuli presented in a mini-Ganzfeld. Contrast-enhanced MRI examinations were performed. Results of both tests were blindly assessed by independent evaluators. F-VEPs were judged to be improved, stable or worsened if changes in the amplitude and/or phase angle of the response exceeded the limits of test–retest variability (±90th percentile) established for the same patients. MRI results were judged to show regression, stabilization or progression of OG based on its changes in size (±20%) or extension. Two to seven pairs of F-VEP/MRI examinations per patient (median: 4) were collected. Based on a total of 38 pairs of F-VEP/MRI examinations, both tests agreeed in showing worsening (progression), stabilization and improvement (regression) in 5, 15 and 10 cases, respectively. In 3 cases, F-VEPs showed a worsening and MRI a stabilization, while in 5 cases F-VEPs showed an improvement and MRI a stabilization. Agreement between F-VEP and MRI changes was 78.9% (95% CI: ± 37%, K statistics = 0.67, P < 0.001). The results indicate that longitudinal F-VEP changes can predict changes in MRI-assessed OG size and extension, providing a non-invasive functional assay, complementary to neuro-imaging, for OG follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. North K, Cochineas C, Tang E, Fagan E (1994) Optic gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1: role of visual evoked potentials. Pediatr Neurol 10(2):117–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Listernick R, Louis DN, Packer RJ, Gutmann DH (1997) Optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis 1: consensus statement from the NF1 Optic Pathway Gioma Task Force. Ann Neurol 41(2):143–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Listernick R, Charrow J, Greenwald MJ, Mets M (1994) Natural history of optic pathway tumours in children with neurofibromatosis type I: a longitudinal study. J Paediatr 125:6366

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wright JE, McNabb AA, Mcdonald WI (1989) Optic nerve glioma and the management of optic nerve tumours in the young. Br J Ophthalmol 73:967–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis RA, Gerson LP, Axelson KA, Riccardi VM, Whitford RP (1984) von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis II. Incidence of optic gliomata. Ophthalmology 91(8):929–935

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Groswasser Z, Kriss A, Halliday AM, McDonald WI (1985) Pattern- and flash-evoked potentials in the assessment and management of optic nerve gliomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48(11):1125–1134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jabbari B, Maitland CG, Morris LM, Morales J, Gunderson CH (1985) The value of visual evoked potential as a screening test in neurofibromatosis. Arch-Neurol 42(11):1072–1074

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Imes RK, Hoyt WF (1986) Childhood chiasmal gliomas: update on the fate of patients in the 1969 San Francisco Study. Br J Ophthalmol 70(3):179–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Listernick R, Charrow J, Greenwald MJ, Esterly NB (1989) Optic gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr 114(5):788–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Listernick R, Charrow J (1990) Neurofibromatosis type 1 in childhood. J Pediatr 116(6):845–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng Y, North KN (2001) Visual-evoked potentials in the assessment of optic gliomas. Ped Neurol 24:44–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Neurofibromatosis (1988) Neurofibromatosis. Conference Statement. Arch Neurol 45:575–578

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kupersmith MJ, Siegel IM, Carr RE, Ransohoff J, Flamm E, Shakin E (1981) Visual evoked potentials in chiasmal gliomas in four adults. Arch Neurol 38(6):362–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trisciuzzi MTS, Riccardi R, Piccardi M, Iarossi G, Buzzonetti L, Dickmann A, Colosimo C, Ruggiero A, Di Rocco C, Falsini B (2004) A fast visual evoked potential method for functional assessment and follow-up of childhood optic gliomas. Clin Neurophysiol 115:217–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balcer LJ, Liu GT, Heller G, Bilaniuk L, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL, Molloy PT, Phillips PC, Janss AJ, Vaughn S, Maguire MG (2001) Visual loss in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway gliomas: relation to tumour location by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 131(4):442–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn SS, Mantello MT, Jones KM, Mulkern RV, Melki PS, Higuchi N, Barnes PD (1992) Rapid MR imaging of the pediatric brain using the fast spin-echo technique. Am J Neuroradiol 13(4):1169–1177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Packer RJ, Lange B, Ater J, Nicholson HS, Allen J, Walker R, Prados M, Jakacki R, Reaman G, Needles MN (1993) Carboplatin and vincristine for recurrent and newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas of childhood. J Clin Oncol 11(5):850–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marmor MF, Arden GB, Nilson SEG, Zrenner E (1989) Standard for clinical electroretinography. Arch Ophthalmol 107: 816–819

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zar JH (1974) Circular distributions. In: Zar JH (ed) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 310–328

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tarbell NJ (1990) Radiation therapy in the management of patients with optic chiasm glioma. In: Karf B (ed) Optic gliomas in neurofibromatosis. National neurofibromatosis Foundation, New York, pp 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parsa CF, Hoyt CS, Lesser RL, Weinstein JM, Strother CM, Muci-Mendoza R, Ramella M, Manor RS, Fletcher WA, Repka MX, Garrity JA, Ebner RN, Monteiro NL, McFadzean RM, Rubtsova IV, Hoyt WF (2001) Spontaneous regression of optic gliomas: thirteen cases documented by serial neuroimaging. Arch Ophthalmol 119(4):516–529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedetto Falsini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falsini, B., Ziccardi, L., Lazzareschi, I. et al. Longitudinal assessment of childhood optic gliomas: relationship between flicker visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Neurooncol 88, 87–96 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9537-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9537-1

Keywords

Navigation