Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of the body and power between Han Feizi and Michel Foucault

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The body has increasingly become a research hotspot, with a focus being the relationship between the body and power. Michel Foucault’s Discipline and punish explores the topic of corporeality in relation to the pervasive disciplinary power of modern society. The Chinese counterpart of Foucault is Han Feizi (280 BCE- 233 BCE) and his discussion of the control of the body by the power of the monarch. A comparative study of the two shows their different views on the relation between the body and power and also, more importantly, brings us back to the very issue of what extent or limits there should be to disciplinary power. Based on the analysis of their differences in terms of the subject, object, characteristics, and purpose of bodily discipline, this paper argues that Han Feizi focuses on the unity, wholeness, continuity, and inheritance of power in disciplining the body. It is a singular power that promotes only the interests of the monarchy. In contrast, power in Foucault’s discussion is plural and focuses on the individuality, margins, and differences, but only in more invisible and subtle ways in disciplining and punishing people in modern society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chambon, A. S. (1999). Reading Foucault for social work. Columbia University Press

  • Chen, G. Y. (1992). 老庄新论 [A new interpretation of Laozi and Zhuangzi]. Shanghai Classics Publishing House.

  • Deacon, R. (1998). Strategies of governance Michel Foucault on power. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 92, 113–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Trans., A. Sheridan). Vintage Books.

  • Garland, D. (1986). Foucault’s “Discipline and punish”—an exposition and critique. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 11(4), 847–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, F. Z. (1974). 韩非子选 [Selected works by Han Fei]. Shanghai People's Publishing House.

  • Li, Y. F. (2021). 舒斯特曼如何阐释福柯的身体美学: 兼论实用主义身体美学的理论与实践倾向 [How Schusterman interprets Foucault’s Body Aesthetics: on the theoretical and practical tendency of pragmatic Body Aesthetics]. Journal of Southwest University Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 1, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. Rouledge.

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power (Trans., W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale). Vintage Books.

  • Qi, L. H. (2013). 中国古代文化中的身体观念及其发展 [The body concept and its development in ancient Chinese culture]. Doctoral dissertation. Hunan Normal University.

  • Song, H. B. (2015). 论先秦儒家与法家的成德路径— 以孔孟荀韩为中心 [On the path to be virtuous of Confucianism and Legalist school in the pre-qin period]. Philosophical Research, 5, 36–47.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as metaphor. Farrar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1989). The new historicism: political commitment and the postmodern critic. In H. Aram Veeser (Ed.), The new historicism (pp. 277–293). Routledge.

  • Sun, Z. X. (2012). 福柯的身体图景 [Foucault’s body picture]. Master Dissertation. Guangxi Normal University.

  • Taylor, C. (1984). Foucault on freedom and truth. Political Theory, 12(2), 152–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkel, G. (1990). Michel Foucault: Law, power, and knowledge. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), 170–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, G. C. (2012). 福柯的身体政治评析 [An analysis of Foucault’s body politics]. Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute, 6, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xunzi. (1983). 荀子简释 [Annotations on Xunzi’s works] (Ed., Liang, Q.). Zhonghua Book Company.

  • Zhang, W. C. (2010). 福柯的身体理论 [Foucault’s theory of the Body]. Master Dissertation. Lanzhou University.

  • Zhang, H. Y. (2021). 道德观与人性论: 韩非子政治思想研究 [Morality and human nature: a study of Han Feizi's thoughts on politics]. Master Dissertation. Northwest University.

  • Zhou, C. S. (1990). 白话老子 [Vernacular interpretations of Laozi]. SANQIN Publishing House.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peina Zhuang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuang, P., Weng, S. A comparative study of the body and power between Han Feizi and Michel Foucault. Neohelicon 50, 761–773 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-023-00705-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-023-00705-w

Keywords

Navigation