Abstract
This essay advances a new approach to readers’ emotional engagements with narrative, proposing to examine them in the wider context of readers’ storyworld (re)construction and comprehension. For demonstration, it applies this newly proposed framework to an analysis of surprise, suspense, and curiosity in narrative experience, the three emotional effects viewed by Meir Sternberg as narrative’s defining interests. By appealing to cognitive frames and reader’s framing acts, it identifies frame-shifting, frame-completion, and frame-matching as their respective underlying mechanisms. Effectiveness of this approach in practice may prompt us to rethink emotion’s proper role in narrative communication, as well as question the necessity of relying on a story-discourse dichotomy while addressing related issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth, W. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Booth, W. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Los Angles: University of California Press.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Hogan, P. (2011). Affective narratology: The emotional structure of stories. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Woman, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Lehnert, W. G. (1979). The role of scripts in understanding. In D. Metzing (Ed.), Frame conceptions and text understanding (pp. 79–95). New York: de Gruyter.
Minsky, M. (1979). A framework for representing knowledge. In D. Metzing (Ed.), Frame conceptions and text understanding (pp. 1–25). New York: de Gruyter.
Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (1987). Culture and cognition. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 3–40). London: Cambridge University Press.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, M. (1990). Telling in time (I): Chronology and narrative theory. Poetics Today, 11(4), 901–948.
Sternberg, M. (1992). Telling in time (II): Chronology, teleology, narrativity. Poetics Today, 13(3), 463–541.
Sternberg, M. (2001). How narrativity makes a difference. Narrative, 9(2), 115–122.
Sternberg, M. (2003a). Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (I). Poetics Today, 24(2), 297–395.
Sternberg, M. (2003b). Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (II). Poetics Today, 24(3), 517–638.
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, Y. Framing surprise, suspense, and curiosity: a cognitive approach to the emotional effects of narrative. Neohelicon 45, 517–531 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-018-0462-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-018-0462-9