Abstract
In the history of contemporary narrative theory, Mikhail Bakhtin exists like a unique “specter” due to his narrative theories, which are classified as the early theories of structuralism and also closely related to the new narratology. Although Bakhtin’s dialogue, monologue, and double-voiced discourse were interpreted by Tzvetan Todorov as a form of formalism, Bakhtin’s theory of the polyphonic novel was questioned by Todorov. Wayne Booth had completed constructing the rhetoric of fiction in the 1960s, but when he got in touch with Bakhtin in the 1980s, he was shocked to find that Bakhtin had “awakened” him. The narrative theories of Booth and Bakhtin strongly resonate in the relationship construction regarding the author and the protagonist, the narrator and the reader, and the resonation is also revealed from a novel’s rhetoric to its ethics. Booth’s student James Phelan further realized the importance of Bakhtin in promoting the study of narrative ethics. In Wallace Martin’s Recent theories of narrative, the references and discussions about Bakhtin were truly “everywhere.” The purpose of this article is to analyze the cause of “the tension within the narrative theory” raised by McHale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth, W. (1982). Freedom of interpretation: Bakhtin and the challenge of feminist criticism. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 45–76.
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Booth, W. C. (1984). Introduction. In M. Bakhtin Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. and Transl) (pp. xiii–xxvii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Booth, W. C. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Booth, W. (2006). How Bakhtin woke me up. In The essential Wayne Booth (Ed.,W. Jost) (pp. 140–153). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ducrot, O., & Todorov, T. (1979). Encyclopedic dictionary of the sciences of language. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Martin, W. (1986). Recent theories of narrative. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
McHale, B. (2007). Ghosts and monsters: On the (im)possibility of narrating the history of narrative theory. In J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A companion to narrative theory (pp. 60–72). Malden: Blackwell.
Phelan, J. (1989). Reading people, reading plots: Character, progression, and the interpretation of narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Phelan, J. (1996). Narrative as rhetoric, technique, audiences, ethics, ideology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Todorov, T. (1968). Poétique, Qu’est-ce que le structuralisme?. Paris: Seuil.
Todorov, T. (1981). Introduction to poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Todorov, T., & Brut, E. (1979). On literary genesis. Yale French Studies, 58, 213–235.
Wu, X. (2005). Afterword. In W. Martin, Dang dai xu shi xuer [Recent theories of narrative] (Trans., Wu, X.) (pp. 273–276). Beijing: Peking University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, J. The tension within the “specter” of Bakhtin and narrative theory. Neohelicon 45, 491–503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-018-0460-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-018-0460-y