Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 689–709 | Cite as

The cosmic sublime in the aesthetics of Longinus and Zhuangzi

  • Mingjun LuEmail author
Article

Abstract

This essay features a comparative study of the aesthetics represented by the Greco-Roman critic Longinus and the Chinese Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi through what I would call the cosmic sublime. Both Longinus and Zhuangzi, I propose, articulate an aesthetic ideal of the cosmic sublime, by which I mean the grandeur captured by a cosmic perspective or obtained from contemplating phenomena of a planetary scale, as well as the emotions associated with experience of the sublime. And both seek to theorize the sublime by positing the great-small and subject-object distinction. While concurring to the importance of great natures in producing and appreciating sublime images, the two thinkers diverge with regard to the relation of the subject and object of aesthetic judgment. Where Longinus presages Kant in emphasizing the preeminence of the judging mind in comprehending cosmic phenomena, Zhuangzi asserts the merging of the aesthetic subject with the primal simplicity, a claim that anticipates Hölderlin and Nietzsche’s call to identify with the Dionysian One. As an aesthetic category, the cosmic sublime provides a vantage point from which to view how the human mind confronts and conceptualizes grandeur of an infinite dimension. As a comparative lens, the cosmic sublime helps reveal not only a new aesthetic ideal but also a distinctive Chinese aesthetics analogous to the Western sublime tradition.

Keywords

The cosmic sublime The subject-object distinction The great-small distinction Primal simplicity or Oneness 

References

  1. Allinson, R. (1989). Chuang–Tzu for spiritual transformation: An analysis of the inner chapters. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle (Revised ed. by J. Barnes) (2 Vols). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1987). The poetics of Aristotle (S. Halliwell, Trans). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, F. (2001). The new advancement of learning (G. W. Kitchin, Ed.). Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books. (Original work published 1605).Google Scholar
  5. De Jonge, C. (2012). Dionysius and Longinus on the sublime: Rhetoric and religious language. American Journal of Philosophy, 133(2), 271–300.Google Scholar
  6. De Jonge, C. (2013). Longinus 36.3: The faulty colossus and Plato’s Phaedrus. Trends in Classics, 5(2), 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser, C. (2011). Emotion and agency in Zhuangzi. Asian Philosophy, 21(1), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gu, M. (2003). Aesthetic suggestiveness in Chinese thought: A symphony of metaphysics and aesthetics. Philosophy East and West, 53(4), 490–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu, M. (2009). From yuanqi (primal energy) to wenqi (literary pneuma): A philosophical study of a Chinese aesthetic. Philosophy East and West, 59(1), 221–246.Google Scholar
  10. Guerlac, S. (1985). Longinus and the subject of the sublime. New Literary History, 16(2), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo, X. & Cheng, X. (2010). Exegesis and annotation of the Zhuangzi. In C. Cao. & L. Huang (Eds.). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  12. Hölderlin, F. (1965). Hyperion, or the Hermit in Greece (W. R. Trask, Trans.). New York: Friedrich Ungar.Google Scholar
  13. Innes, D. (2002). Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the sublime. Mnemosyne, 55, 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, J. (2015). Beyond Burke’s precedent and back again: Longinus and the romantic sublime. Neophilologus, 99, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kant, I. (2007). Critique of judgment (J. Meredith, Trans.). N. Walker (Rev.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Laozi. (2013). (S. Rao, Ed.). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  17. Li, Z. (2010). The Chinese aesthetic tradition (M. B. Samei, Trans.). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lian, X. (2009). Zhuangzi the poet: Rereading the Peng bird image. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 8, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Longinus. (1995). On the sublime (pp.160–305) (W. H. Fyfe, Trans.). D. Russell (Rev.). Cambridge, Mss.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Machek, D. (2015). ‘Emotions that do not move’: Zhuangzi and Stoics on self-emerging feelings. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 14, 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mair, V. (1983). Experimental essays on Chuang-tzu. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  22. Möller, H. (2004). Daoism explained: From the dream of the butterfly to the fishnet allegory. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  23. Nietzsche, F. (2003). The birth of tragedy out of the spirit of music (S. Whiteside, Trans.). M. Tanner (Ed.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Olberding, A. (2007). Sorrow and the sage: Grief in the Zhuangzi. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 6(4), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pas, J. (1981). Chuang Tzu’s essays on ‘Free Flight Into Transcendence’ and ‘Responsive Rulership’. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 8, 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porter, J. (2007). Lucretius and the sublime. In S. Gillespie & P. Hardie (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Lucretius (pp. 167–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porter, J. (2008). The disgrace of matter in ancient aesthetics. In I. Sluiter & R. Rosen (Eds.), Kakos: Badness and anti-value in classical antiquity (pp. 283–317). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rayman, J. (2012). Kant on sublimity and morality. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, D. (1964). Longinus: On the sublime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Saussy, H. (1993). The problem of Chinese aesthetics. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Trigg, D. (2004). Schopenhauer and the sublime pleasure of tragedy. Philosophy and Literature, 28(1), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Verene, D. (2006). Philosophical aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 40(4), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wong, D. (2006). The meaning of detachment in Daoism, Buddhism, and Stoicism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 5(2), 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhouyi. (2015). (H. Guo, Ed.). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  35. Zhu, R. (2002). Wu-Wei: Lao-zi, Zhuang-zi, and the aesthetic judgment. Asian Philosophy, 12(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu, G. (2006). Zhu Guangqian on aesthetic beauty. Beijing: Jincheng Chuban She.Google Scholar
  37. Zhuangzi. (2015). (Y. Fang, Ed.). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations