Abstract
In response to the contemporary American philosopher Michael J. Sandel’s tremendous popularity and ongoing engagements with Chinese philosophy, which are often offered as evidence of a deep resonance between his work and contemporary Chinese interests in justice, I argue that his conception of justice as a product of the storyteller’s narrative quest encounters two potential problems when considered from a Chinese perspective. The first is whether “Chinese” justice—which can be viewed substantially as a collective if not individual attempt to overcome subalternity as the Oriental subject—can be achieved through the foreign forms of moral reasoning that are perhaps guilty of consigning Chinese to their status as Orientals in the first place. The second questions whether the Western culture of storytelling, of the heroic subject who conquers the other (so often the Oriental in modern times), is not already a product and producer of injustice, and in its contemporary forms, a fantasy and fetish of capitalist society that is not only incapable of individual justice, but also complicit in injustices towards others. These points are raised in tandem with discussions of ongoing generational shifts in China largely attributable to the rapid expansion of a market economy and the growing normalization of Western-style heroic, justice seeking storyteller, which might in turn legitimize Sandel’s approach to justice. However, from a Marxist perspective, I argue that such developments might be Trojan horses for new forms of subjugation, alienation, and inauthentic being—in short, contra Western Orientalist universalism, the very injustices that China’s modernity project has aimed to overcome and with which it risks assimilation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, P. (1993). Schopenhauer and Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 43(2), 255–278.
Adorno, T.W. (2001). Kant’s Critique of pure reason (R. Livingstone, Trans). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Allen, I. J. (2013). Translator’s notes. In F. Nietzsche, The Dionysian vision of the world (pp. 29–58). Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (B. Brewster, Trans). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127–186). New York: MR Press.
Ames, R. T. (2016). Theorizing ‘person’ in Confucian ethics: A good place to start. Presentation at the International conference on Michael Sandel and Chinese philosophy, Shanghai, March 7–10.
Aristotle. (1984). Metaphysics (W. D. Ross Trans.). In The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2, ed. J. Barnes, pp. 1552–1728). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Arthur, C. (2004). Subject and counter-subject. Historical Materialism, 12(3), 93–102.
Bear, L. (2004). Fighting for peace (and art films), Zhang Yimou on ‘hero’. IndieWire. http://www.indiewire.com/2004/08/fighting-for-peace-and-art-films-zhang-yimou-on-hero-78697/. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Brindley, E. F. (2010). Individualism in early China: Human agency and the self in thought and politics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Campbell, J. (1968). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dasgupta, S. (1955). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol. V). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dasgupta, S. (1961). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol. IV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, G. (2007). Worrying about China: The language of Chinese critical inquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Davies, G. (2013). Lu Xun’s revolution: Writing in a time of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deresiewicz, W. (2014). Excellent sheep: The miseducation of the American elite and the way to a meaningful life. New York: Basic Books.
Dubois, W. E. B. (1987). The souls of black folk in Writings. New York: Library of America.
Edwards, L. (2010). Military celebrity in China: The evolution of ‘heroic and model servicemen’. In Elaine Jeffreys & Louise Edwards (Eds.), Celebrity in China (pp. 21–44). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Etzioni, A. (2010) Review: Michael J. Sandel, Justice: What’s the right thing to do? In The Hedgehog Review (pp. 85–89). Spring.
Foucault, M. (2001). The hermeneutics of the subject. (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Picador.
Froese, K. (2006). Nietzsche, Heidegger, and daoist thought: Crossing paths in-between. Albany: SUNY Press.
Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Graham, A. C. (1989). Disputers of the tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. Chicago: Open Court.
Gramsci, A. (1992). Prison notebooks (J.A. Buttigieg and A. Callari, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Gu, M. D. (2013). Sinologism: An alternative to orientalism and postcolonialism. London: Routledge.
Guo, Y. (2010). Recycled heroes, invented tradition and transformed identity. In Gary D. Rawnsley & Ming-Yeh T. Rawnsley (Eds.), Global Chinese cinema: The culture and politics of hero (pp. 27–42). London: Routledge.
Guyer, P., & Wood, A. W. (1998). Introduction. In Immanuel Kant, Critique of pure reason (pp. 1–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (1995). Anticipating China: Thinking through the narratives of Chinese and Western culture. Albany: SUNY Press.
Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (2003). Daodejing: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine.
Harman, C. (2010). Zombie capitalism: Global crisis and the relevance of Marx. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press.
Horkheimer, M. (2012). Critique of instrumental reason (M.J. O’Connell Trans.). London: Verso.
Horkheimer, M. (2013). Eclipse of reason. London: Bloomsbury.
Husserl, E. (1965). Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy (Q. Lauer, Trans.) New York: Harper and Row.
Huxley, A. (1946). Brave new world. New York: Harper.
Imamichi, T. (2004). In search of wisdom: One philosopher’s journey (M.E. Foster, Trans.). Tokyo: International House of Japan.
Ip, H. (2005). Intellectuals in revolutionary China, 1921-1949: Leaders, heroes and sophisticates. London: Routledge.
Janaway, C. (2003). Self and world in Schopenhauer’s philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1992). Lectures on logic (J. M. Young, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1996). Critique of pure reason. (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Lau, D. C., & Ames, R. T. (1998). Yuan dao: Tracing dao to its source. New York: Ballantine.
Lin, W. (2013). Zhongerbing shi zhong shenme bing? China Youth Daily http://zqb.cyol.com/html/201311/05/nw.D110000zgqnb_20131105_2-11.htm. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Lukács, G. (1980). The destruction of reason. London: Merlin Press.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington and B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional man. London: Routledge.
May, R. (1996). Heidegger’s hidden sources: East-Asian influences on his work (G. Parks, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. New York: Doubleday.
Mungello, D. E. (1988). Curious land: Jesuit accommodation and the origins of sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Mungello, D. E. (2009). The great encounter of China and the west, 1500–1800. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global trends 2030: Alternative worlds. Washington: Directorate of National Intelligence.
Ng, M. (1988). The Russian hero in modern Chinese fiction. Albany: State University Press.
Nietzsche, F. (2005). The Anti-Christ. In Ecce homo, Twilight of the idols, and other writings (ed. A. Ridley & J. Norman) (pp. 1–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J., & Schrader, F. E. (1977). Marx’s précis of Hegel’s doctrine on being in the minor logic. IRSH, 22(3), 423–431.
Okakura, K. (1906). The book of tea. London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Perkins, F. (2004). Leibniz and China: A commerce of light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Qian L. (2015) Daxue de liji zhuyizhe. http://xw.qq.com/cul/20150517011881/CUL2015051701188100. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Rosemount, H., Jr. (1991). Rights-bearing individuals and role-bearing persons”. In M. Bockover (Ed.), Rules, rituals, and responsibility: Essays dedicated to Herbert Fingarette (pp. 71–101). Chicago: Open Court.
Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
Sandel, M. J. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, M. J. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Schrader, F. E. (2014). Paradoxes of political economy: Towards a sociology of consciousness and knowledge. Seminar on Marx, East China Normal University, June 6.
Schuessler, A. (2007). ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Schwartz, B. I. (1964). In search of wealth and power: Yen Fu and the West. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Shang, G. L. (2006). Liberation as affirmation: The religiosity of Zhuangzi and Nietzsche. Albany: SUNY Press.
Sima Qian. (2002). Shiji, part II (Zhou Wen, Trans.). Beijing: Tuanjie Press.
Smith, A. D. (2003). Husserl and the Cartesian meditations. London: Routledge.
Smith, C.S. (2004). ‘Hero’ soars, and its director thanks ‘Crouching tiger,’ New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/02/movies/hero-soars-and-its-director-thanks-crouching-tiger.html?_r=0. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Gary Nelson (Ed.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Staal, F. (1988). Universals: Studies in Indian logic and linguistics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tian, C. (2005). Chinese dialectics: From Yijing to Marxism. Lanham: Lexington.
Tomšič, S. (2015). The capitalist unconscious: Marx and Lacan. London: Verso.
Vukovich, D. (2012). China and orientalism: Western knowledge production and the PRC. London: Routledge.
Wan W. (2015). Jingzhi de liji zhuyi zhe he changqingteng de mianyang. http://www.infzm.com/content/110929. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Wang, M. (2014). The West as the other: A genealogy of Chinese occidentalism. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Wang, Q. (2014). Memory, subjectivity and independent Chinese cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wardy, R. (2000). Aristotle in China: Language, categories and translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wei, W. (2015). Ku du zhongguo shehui. Guangxi: Guangxi Shifan Daxue Chubanshe.
Wu, G. (2014). The great dragon fantasy: A Lacanian analysis of contemporary Chinese thought. Singapore: World Scientific Press.
Wu, Y. (2014). The Cultural Revolution at the margins: Chinese socialism in crisis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ziporyn, B. (2012). Ironies of oneness and difference: Coherence in early Chinese thought. Albany: SUNY Press.
Žižek, S. (1998). The Cartesian subject versus the Cartesian theater. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Cogito and the unconscious (pp. 247–274). Durham: Duke University Press.
Žižek, S. (2007). Cogito, madness and religion: Derrida, Foucault and then Lacan. http://www.lacan.com/zizforest.html. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahoney, J.G. Can the oriental know justice? Can the subaltern tell stories?. Neohelicon 44, 445–468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-017-0407-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-017-0407-8